• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The secrets will not be exposed… Unless you are willing to join the black parade…

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    There was also a software to burn pictures in the disc via the burn patterns. There’s a open source project now but it didn’t work for me.

    Edit: i don’t mean the label side but the data side. But has similiar problems with supported players.

    • Aganim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The first laptop I bought had a DVD burner which came with support for LightScribe, which required discs with a special coating. You designed a cover, put the disc in your drive upside down and it would burn the image into the disc. You could only do grayscale as far as I know, but I still thought it was pretty neat at the time.

    • PKscope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I had one of those “LightScribe” burners. I think I only used it a couple of times because the media was much more expensive than standard CD-R and I didn’t care enough to get good at it. It was just a slow extra step when I’m trying to burn a quick cd before I head to the bus stop in the morning.

      Funnily, burning the lightscribe cd was faster than the first mp3 player I had. My first mp3 player was a Creative something or other with 32mb of storage. Adding the ~15 songs you could fit on it took fucking donkey’s years.

  • Shamber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Burning CD’S aside, does she think we did this to get a text? 🤣🤣 this shit was before mobile phone were a thing, and when you had one as a teen you still couldn’t afford to text for hours on end

    • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      and when you had one as a teen you still couldn’t afford to text for hours on end

      And neither could my parents as it turned out

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I had this application that would print a CD shaped stickers. I could upload and design any background, and add text with any font. It was when computers peaked.

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    We Gen Z get called “the first digital kids” but I clearly remember the last days of physical and optical media. My sister and I would burn CDs with songs we would download from LimeWire.

    • ragas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Pysical is not the opposite of digital.

      Analog is the opposite of digital.

      A CD is a digital medium, just like an SSD is.

      If you want a rotating disk medium which is analog, you would need to get a vinyl.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Haha yeah, I think SpiceDealer’s comment inadvertently supports the notion it’s meant to dispel.

        But to be fair, the media world has been using the word “digital” to mean “electronic delivery” for a long time.

  • RotSteinFinke@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    1 day ago

    Of course it was a ritual. It was a form of necromancy, to start you had to invoke the name of an ancient Roman emperor

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 day ago

        On the mac, there was Toast (it burns), and Nero had an ad that said that they “Eat Toast for Breakfast.”

        What a great era for software branding.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The naming is one thing I legitimately like about the whole Linux/GNU/FOSS world.

          Things are still named by nerds/enthusiasts who have some spark of joy and fun left in their hearts. Could you imagine a sanitized corporate software product released today with a name that directly refers to the established product it is meant to displace?

          For example, things like GNU’s Not Unix or my favorite remotely accessible text/terminal based email client I used around the turn of the century, PINE Is Not Elm.

          Then you get fun second-order software names like GIMP, too.

          It’s all so preferable to the commercial software branding world where even though the visual presentation is extremely samey (everybody switching to the same popular boring fonts and removing logos/artwork), the actual brands are often made up silly words that are easy to get the domain name and the social handles for.

          Be sure to follow BONTO! on all your favorite trillion dollar propaganda and surveillance platforms!

          • ch00f@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Corporate word processing software: Word

            Apple’s photo management software: Photos

        • ragas@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Also DDG have their own crawler, so they can deliver more results than Bing.

          • wischi@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            If it does was you need it to do you should definitely use it, privacy vise it’s obviously way better than google. Haven’t tried in in about 2 years, maybe the search results got better but the last time I tried it often presented me weird sites that technically contained the words I searched for but were completely irrelevant - entered the same question onto Google and immediately got me a stack overflow question that was practically the same question I had but phrased a bit differently. But as I said, maybe it’s no longer so bad as when I tried it.

            • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              For a long time I used DuckDuckGo for everything except specific error messages, because Google was better at those, but Google got more shitty and so did stack overflow, so I don’t bother much with Google anymore.

          • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’ve tried everything and I really really really can’t use Google. It just never gets me what I want. DDG works ok, and is usually my default because it’s fast and simple.

            Recently (1 or 2 years) I’ve found Brave search to be fantastic though. You may want to disable the AI search summary (it’s better than Google’s or DDG’s ai stuff, but still ultimately ai). Now, I find myself reaching for brave search when I’m doing more serious searching. I have both DDG and Brave saved as search short cuts in librewolf. Highly recommend.