https://youtu.be/nu6C2KL_S9o

The classic “it is not big enough” while actively preventing the user base to grow.

I stopped gaming because of this shit.

They just don’t need to build their shit on something that requires wine. While there are solutions, just make it run natively.

Because you know the actual enemy, you defend a meme that demonises “propagandised individuals” instead of the enemy. Interesting choice.

No i didn’t.

I understand what capitalists are and he does too. We agree with the definition.

He just feels forced to conflate both to justify a toxic meme.

Of course, it works. The tech was never the issue. The issue is that they think that linux is easier to modify to break the kernel anti cheat. It is a PR issue, when there is enough money, magically the pr issue is gone.

As if the rhetoric of today has no influence on the rhetoric of tomorrow.

But even in this very short sighted context, the conflation of “propagandised individuals” and “capitalist” is obviously toxic to the aim of archiving communism.

I will take a wild guess that you have many friends who are raised in capitalistic environments and who have been exposed to anti communism propaganda. Some of that propaganda probably worked on them and consequently they are propagandised individuals. But I doubt you would call them capitalist and enemy. Ofc, you wouldn’t as you would special plead for them, while happily supporting conflating propagandised individuals with capitalists and the enemy.

Thanks for proving my point. Your “us vs them” thinking caused you to confuse “propagandised individuals” with “capitalist” and ignore the big difference between both.

“Capitalist” is a class that in communism doesn’t exist. So consequently, after the implementation of communism there is no enemy of the class “capitalist” anymore. So again, communism would serve all people.

“Propagandised individuals” wouldn’t disappear after the implementation of communism. They can be discriminate against.

I am excited for the steam machine because of the anti cheat issue. If we push for linux gaming, they are forced to either find a spyware kernel anti cheat solution for linux or drop the spyware kernel anti cheat.

I don’t think promoting these sentiments does anything but propagandise an “us vs them” mentality that is fundamentally toxic to the idea of communism.

“Four legs good, two legs bad” is all, I am gonna say.

Can we keep Monica out of trump x bubba jokes?

So he has a story about his mother making her own decision over her own life and body and he is happy about her decision, I wonder if there is a lesson in that.

I just want to point out that saying something has the same energy doesn’t imply that it is the same thing in intensity. In fact, often we are hyperbolic to highlight the kind of energy that we are talking about.

The reason why you are getting down voted is also not because of your opinion that these things are different, in intensity or whatever, but because it feels like you really want to make that difference. Why do you care so much about that difference? Why are you defending bad behaviour from being compared to other bad behaviour? Why do you care? Most of people that you called autistic (in a prejorative manner), understand that as you trying to justify that behavior, and the answer to the question of “why would they” is that they understand you as such a person. A person who is acting in a way and is trying to excuse it.

Of course, I don’t claim such a thing but I thought, I would help you to understand this social event in your life, as these can be difficult to understand for some people, e.g. autistic people. I am proud of all the autistic people in this community who understood this interaction, good job! I know it might wasn’t easy for you.

Well take their wealth. They got their labours worth of resources and spent them.

I don’t think there are many meme places where this meme would be appreciated for what it is.

I think it is rather questionable to express that any of the real world practices of the porn industry is “outside the scope” when judging the real world practices of hooters. I think it is shameful that hooters doesn’t have very clear guidelines. I think it is shameful to make “jokes” that could make someone uncomfortable in such a dynamic. And okay, the man is probably lying to his wife and speaks in vague terms. He probably wants to look at the servers, but does he do more? That is your assumption. Understandable one but an assumption. So let’s grant that he makes weird jokes to the servers. Is he really less of a creep when he would watching Mia Khalifa porn? Of course, as Mia probably wouldn’t know that he specifically is watching, he would cause less harm in a sense, but the question is not harm reduction but being a creep.

I don’t see how you conclude that e.g. the man in the post plans to bend the rules at all.

The rest of your comment is disappointing. You know that I didn’t mean that a customer can’t sexually assault a server or former server. I meant that if the server quits, they are not longer being sexualized as part of their job and unless people are fucking creeps, their former employment should continue to sexualize them.

Also well it is a regrettable career. That doesn’t mean you have to regret it. But it is certainly regrettable like any other career. And women like Mia Khalifa have expressed regret in the past and yet while she was expressing regret, porn videos of her were widely available and consumed. That is what I was talking about. Not that the career is always ending in regret.

Thanks, I enjoyed explore the topic with you. Ch00f is doing a good job that expressing their thoughts. I am not convinced but I respect their effort and skill.

Yes there is a difference.

A customer of porn could share that porn long after that actress quit the industry and has publicly expressed regret.

A customer of hooters can’t force the server to continue to be sexualized at hooters.

But let’s focus on your example,

A customer could break rules at hooters, therefore consume porn and don’t go to hooters?

I guess my question would be creepy in perception or creepy in behavior?

Perception? sure, fine. Behavior? I think sexually dehumanising behavior would be what we would call creepy.

But I think a call to action (what the original comment was) to not be perceived as a creep… idk.