Well, he wanted “sub 10 micron accuracy” on all parts and given the reason especially for visible pieces and that obviously includes the panels. Those panels are famously not lining up properly and due to physics, extend and retake based on temperature, which… causes bending and even more misalignement. As Elon clearly didn’t want that and expected 400 times better results, and he knows more about manufacturing than any other person, no one knew that it will not be possible to be sub 10 micron accurate. Right? But why is there a forum conversation from 2012 about the gap issues with the delorean? And why are they telling the person asking that it is normal and unavoidable with stainless steel? Was that a commonly known issue? Yes it was.

While I am not a fan of ai and don’t trust them… google forced them down my throat and I think you should see it too. https://imgur.com/a/AnQE0xm

How did Elon not know, If he knows more about manufacturing than any human alive, when random people on the internet were aware of the issues with stainless steel panels and gaps? Mystery.

Well she legally changed her full name because she didn’t want to have any relationship with her father and calls him a pathetic man-child.

Elon musk doesn’t seem supportive and so consequently, he will probably not put her in his will, at least it is a real risk for Vivian (if she wanted his money). As she publicly said that she wants nothing from Elon, I would be surprised that she would accept the inheritance.

So Vivian probably rejected her father, cutting all ties, knowing that she loses a predictably ridiculously huge inheritance. Like 1% of elon’s wealth would mean that 7.5 billion…

So i think it is bit unfair to imply that she is only belonging to a minority. I also don’t want to talk to her because I just don’t care for her, like I don’t really care about my friend’s neighbour’s cousin’s mother-in-law. But saying that she is in a hole for being a child of elon as if it was a choice? Shitty take. But if if she would be in that hole, cutting off her father and consequently rejecting a huge inheritance, would dig someone out of that hole for me.

First thing, I have ever read/heard of this man and honestly respect.

With emulation, even more.

Have you ever typed in Chinese characters on a keyboard? I guess not, because otherwise you would know what that comparison is rather obvious and flawed.

Good point

Because ai is so good that they have to invent utility and need, and artificially create usage.

Until you miss a payment and they hit you with the fine for missing a payment.

THEY HAVE TO MAKE MONEY!

No. Their business model is literally currently failing.

People can’t afford to pay back. That is why they couldn’t afford saving for it. So the service provider will sit on bad debt until no one wants to leant them money anymore and they are bankrupt.

https://youtu.be/nu6C2KL_S9o

The classic “it is not big enough” while actively preventing the user base to grow.

I stopped gaming because of this shit.

They just don’t need to build their shit on something that requires wine. While there are solutions, just make it run natively.

Because you know the actual enemy, you defend a meme that demonises “propagandised individuals” instead of the enemy. Interesting choice.

No i didn’t.

I understand what capitalists are and he does too. We agree with the definition.

He just feels forced to conflate both to justify a toxic meme.

Of course, it works. The tech was never the issue. The issue is that they think that linux is easier to modify to break the kernel anti cheat. It is a PR issue, when there is enough money, magically the pr issue is gone.

As if the rhetoric of today has no influence on the rhetoric of tomorrow.

But even in this very short sighted context, the conflation of “propagandised individuals” and “capitalist” is obviously toxic to the aim of archiving communism.

I will take a wild guess that you have many friends who are raised in capitalistic environments and who have been exposed to anti communism propaganda. Some of that propaganda probably worked on them and consequently they are propagandised individuals. But I doubt you would call them capitalist and enemy. Ofc, you wouldn’t as you would special plead for them, while happily supporting conflating propagandised individuals with capitalists and the enemy.

Thanks for proving my point. Your “us vs them” thinking caused you to confuse “propagandised individuals” with “capitalist” and ignore the big difference between both.

“Capitalist” is a class that in communism doesn’t exist. So consequently, after the implementation of communism there is no enemy of the class “capitalist” anymore. So again, communism would serve all people.

“Propagandised individuals” wouldn’t disappear after the implementation of communism. They can be discriminate against.

I am excited for the steam machine because of the anti cheat issue. If we push for linux gaming, they are forced to either find a spyware kernel anti cheat solution for linux or drop the spyware kernel anti cheat.

I don’t think promoting these sentiments does anything but propagandise an “us vs them” mentality that is fundamentally toxic to the idea of communism.

“Four legs good, two legs bad” is all, I am gonna say.

Can we keep Monica out of trump x bubba jokes?