So that’s a yes…

Technically no, not when using the same argument.

Although Australia is also surrounded by ocean so Antarctica, Australia, and everything else

The panama canal is not an ocean…and man made. No amount of squinting could make it a reasonable argument to count it.

North/South America is also not separated by ocean…

You can always get them to eat, I’ve never had a horse not eating when handfed…

Having them eat something containing a radioactive isotope comes to mind…

So in the event of a failed update, what would be the preferable way to handle it then? I think automatically rolling back to a functional state before the update is pretty optimal.

…ok…

Yeah no you’re just using the wrong words to describe your issue.

Yeees, your obvious typo is totally invalidating my previous statement…

I mean, that’s the preferable way should OS should handle a borked update, it sure beats just bricking the computer.

Yes it is, because the HW is completely unnecessary, you can emulate it perfectly on a potato. It only serves a nostalgic purpose, which is also fine, but in all other aspects it is completely obsolete.

No it doesn’t

Yes you did

Except for a fairly tiny niche community of users still using them for nostalgia reasons, the NES is absolutely also ancient and obsolete in every way and has been for several decades.

That’s not them bricking it though. Yes it’s shitty build quality, but that is an entirely different issue than them bricking equipment that still is very much functional from a HW perspective.

According to your link, toxic dose is >10g/day and not 1g

Toxic doses, over 10 grams per day for an adult, greatly exceed the typical dose of under 500 milligrams per day.

Also, >500mg/day will not send you to the hospital…sincerely me, drinking 3-4 double espresso (that’s ~150mg/cup) before lunch at work. Healthy? No doubt it isn’t…but also very far from lethal.

There are plenty of artisinal coffee roasters that source beans ethically.

Oh my fucking god people…I didn’t say you could claim you made something when using AI generated images. I claimed it still makes sense for some things because they hold pretty much no artistic value when made by humans already (like icons, stock images and logos)

No, they’re not, never claimed they did. I said that what comes from it still holds value and is still subject to human approval in the end.

On the sideline…recording