• NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Meanwhile, the government: “That’s fucking stupid. We don’t poison you with the air, that would be inefficient. We have to breathe that, too. We just poison the water and the soil, and if you’re a target we will just pick you up off of the street like a stray cat, we’ve always been very up front about that.”

  • seeigel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Conspiracy theories are an outlet. People need a reason for why society is not as good as they feel it could be.

    Most people blame the other political party. But that doesn’t work for everybody. The mind keeps looking until it finds a reason, and then it fades out all arguments that oppose it.

    We laugh about conspiracy theorists, but most have the same mindset, just with socially acceptable topics.

    • Omega@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Nice thinking, you’re correct and after trying to avoid that pattern you become extremely aware of your own flawed opinions and how others don’t care as long as it means they aren’t pinned as the fault or reason

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    I had my conspiracy theory ex brother in law explain that chem trails were things Biden added to jets to fight global warming… My response was “shit, I wish that was true!”

    Somehow that wasn’t the answer he was expecting.

  • GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    This reminds me of the time when I was a kid and me and several of my family members went racing out into the front yard to watch the plane that was doing all kinds of aerial acrobatics over our neighbors’s field dropping whatever chemical or fertilizer was in their tanks that day so we were all basically coated in it by the time they were done and we went back inside. Except I wasn’t a kid when it happened, I was a fully informed adult who should have known better and then a few days later we found out it was some kind of potentially dangerous fungicide. But on the plus side I now have 3 penises.

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I got back in touch with a friend of mine who who graduated in the same class as me with a B.S. in Physics. When they learned that I’m an atmospheric scientist, their first question was “What’s the deal with Chem trails?”

    Point being, conspiracy theories also infect the educated sometimes.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Dude on my Facebook posted a Pic of some repurposed 747 with a bunch of tubes in the cabin with a caption about the chemtrail stuff taking up space. Like, motherfucker, if it takes that much space, how is every passenger jet doing it??

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Those diagrams and pictures are a disinformation campaign. They show a system that obviously can’t function, so you dismiss the theory out of hand.

        But the reality is that they mix the mind control chemicals directly into regular jet fuel. The pilots don’t even know they are involved.

        /s

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Understanding is cemented in one’s original source of information about the world. Shaping a pre-existing understand requires not just accuracy but volume, because you’re not competing against faulty logic. You’re competing against accumulated memories.

      If someone is deep into the conspiracy theory rabbit hole, what is shaping their opinion is the consistent repetition of orthodoxy over time. Similarly, if someone is highly educated in a particular scientific field, their opinion is shaped by the persistent need to reaffirm fundamental truths in order to succeed and progress. We are not computers. We are not creatures of pure logic. We are the accumulation of our prior experiences and exposures.

      You should not be surprised if an individual - when confronted with a narrow band of contrary information - does not immediately jettison all their prior information. Because ask yourself - would you? I mean, if a single guy showed up with a stack of papers insisting he’s proved without a shadow of a doubt that chemtrails are real and the entire professional weather reporting community is lying to you, is there anything they could show you that you wouldn’t greet with skepticism proportional to your exposure to professional weather science?

      Because, if the answer is “No”, then why would you expect someone immersed in hundreds of hours of conspiracy theory podcasts and think pieces and social media conversations to behave any differently?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Because even if chemtrails were a thing they’re logistically impractical. There are multiple unlikely leaps of logic

        There are multiple steps of logic here

        • can aircraft spray chemicals? Sure, we have ag planes and fire fighting planes. In Vietnamese War we sprayed defoliant
        • is there a mind control chemical that can be sprayed?
        • if there was, could someone benefit from widespread dispersion?
        • can you spread it through jet engine exhaust within it destroying it?
        • is it possible to include with regularly scheduled air service without passengers or crew noticing?
        • how many people would have to be in on the conspiracy and what are the chances of keeping it secret so long?

        So the current examples of spraying from plane do so all at once through special equipment. You’d notice plus can’t really be widespread. It’s extremely unlikely a chemical could be mixed into jet fuel, survive the combustion process, and be spread with enough concentration to be useful. There’s no way such a large program would go unnoticed, could possibly be kept secret. Most importantly, for what purpose? If someone were trying to mind control the whole country what does it benefit to dose a random person in a field with no special skill or access and where there’s no one around to control them?

    • Michael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray

      From the page:

      Between 1949 and 1969, open-air tests of biological agents were conducted 239 times.

      239 open-air tests of biological agents in a 20 year period. Remind me again why people have no reason to be paranoid? This wasn’t that long ago.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

      These aren’t conspiracy theories.

      Is there something real behind these people’s paranoia and suspicion? Do our government, military, and our corporations inspire trust?

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Of course, a true conspiracy unfolds because the masses are unaware. The masses are gaslit if they start catching on.

          But in the absence of compelling evidence, it’s pointless to wildly speculate about from my perspective.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Is there something real behind these people’s paranoia and suspicion? Do our government, military, and our corporations inspire trust?

        No, the US government, as with every government, does not deserve trust. They are not your friend. They will lie to you, directly or by omission.

        However, all governments are bad at coverups. Chem trails would need to have entire leagues and fields paid off and prohibited from investigating it. Not just in America, but world wide. If America was doing Chem trails, there’s nothing really prohibiting China or Russia from calling it out. They have zero reasons to agree to deals to limit their scientists, as it would be a major shake up in geopolitics. America in that instance could not be trusted with any claims of its scientific achievements.

        I don’t really buy into a moon landing hoax or a JFK cover up. By now, everything and everyone involved would have had to been paid off, including families, scientists, historians, and more.

        You don’t need to be mad at a vague shadow government, you can be mad at the actual government for what they are actually doing. Be mad at Tuskegee and Gulf of Tonkin, not 9/11 with wire bombs and plane holograms.

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          I’m not making an argument for chemtrails. It’s pointless to speculate about, there is no evidence or smoking gun.

          I’m just suggesting that we be kind and empathetic towards individuals that do believe these sorts of things. Is it out of character for the US government? Nah, not really.

          Many of these people probably were living in or around 1969. In their lived reality, the US government was doing shit like this. Have things really gotten better?

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            EDIT: Sorry for the essay LOL.

            I really appreciate your take and efforts to be compassionate about the loads of people who simply were let down by a lack of, or sometimes learned cultural opposition to, education. We’re paying for it so hard right now.

            I mean, yeah, MK-Ultra was a very real program, for instance. The Cold War Era was loaded with shadowy nonsense conducted by spooks, all over the place! Real conspiracies totally happened!

            But people on the whole crave sensation and don’t have the logic or education to discern between whistleblowers and grifters.

            I think the part that is so painful is that there’s just so much noise.

            It feels like conspiracy theories generally used to be…More harmless? More often the stuff of kooky neighbors and not always dangerously deluded basement militants and chart-topping podcasts.

            Now it’s a carefully engineered, algorithmically driven pipeline from the former to the latter.

            Now, thanks to social media, they’re politically weaponized psy-ops: Get the masses all riled up about aliens, mind-control vaccines, and satanic child-farming underground pizza delivery chain networks…

            …And they won’t bother to focus their energy any real and “boring” conspiracies, like monopoly-forming, price fixing, shrinkflation, planned obsolescence, cop unions, the insurance industry, manufacturing consent, stock market manipulation, wage theft, billionaire bunkers, car-required civic planning, surveillance normalization, gerrymandering, Cambridge Analytica, McKinsey, class warfare, too-much-to-list about Boeing…

            Because those are very real problems perpetuated by very bad powerful people, and they take a ton of very risky work to fix.

            And those conspiracies are so very boring and predictable, because it’s a massive shell game with a million little nodes that all lead to countless instances of “Someone is doing these bad things to amass more money or influence.”

            Last note: It’s also really odd and telling how the ones who are SO adamant about government conspiracies don’t tend to care much about corporations.

            Government mind control chips in water (to make us more… subservient or something?) Totes!

            But ad companies listening to your devices to figure out when you’re at your weakest to push ads for foolish purchases?

            Naaaaah!

            • Michael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Thanks for the response, I enjoyed reading it and our sentiment largely aligns.

  • hansolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “It’s chemicals!”

    “It’s spider webs of chemicals!”

    “It’s microchips!”

    “It’s sun blocking special metallic smoke!”

    “It’s cancer seeds!”

    • My Mom, an expert on chemtrails
      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, and “it causes cancer” is as well. But not like… It’s raining down cancer on you. More like jet fuel contains known carcinogens.

        It’s more the direct effects. According to my mom, the chemtrails should have…I don’t know, but done whatever it was supposed to be doing by now. A 30+ year timeline for something causing cancer? So less bad than smoking? That’s the metric?

        • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          At least some nutters have the decency to say that it’s mind controlling chemicals, not the “you’ll be dead soon” kind.

          Kind of like the covid vaccine. I should have been dead in 3 6 8 months a year 2 years 3 years 4 years I’ll be dead in 5 years!

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Do they say what purpisebtheyee being mind controlled? How about the impracticality of mind controlling millions of random people with no special access or skills, and you’re not even there to tell them what to do?

            Can’t we at least inject some logic into the chemtrails conspiracy, like it’s a mild sedative to keep you from worry what they’re doing and to keep you from standing up for your rights?

            All those second amendment types talk about how they would repel an unjust government, but they never actually do. It must be the chrmtrsils making them docile

        • Doolbs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I know people who believe all the BS about the chemtrails, and I have started telling them that yes, those are chemtrails.

          And, like a good person I tell that it is Dihydrogen Monoxide.

          Then we go from there.

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      The fourth one of those is unfortunately an almost plausible theory. Plenty of people are seriously advocating for studies into Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) in order to mitigate climate change so that the almighty free market would have more time to fix the problem without any need for systemic change.

      But that wouldn’t be visible to the naked eye :D

      Funnily enough, contrails like all other clouds composed of ice crystals actually warm the planet up by letting shortwave radiation from the sun through while reflecting longwave (infrared), effectively trapping heat. Thcker and lower clouds are more effective at reflecting shortwave radiation.

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, but the conspiracy theory version is that it’s a scam to further the scam that is climate change. It doesn’t make any sense.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          doesn’t make any sense.

          My theory?

          The real conspiracy: It always goes back to the desires of capital.

          Why is it always that climate change is a huge con job and it’s all a secret control plan that we…need to stop burning and breathing known carcinogens?

          Oh, because the evil shadow government orgs like the EPA and OSHA want to take all our good ol’ jobs (tey derk er jurbz!) with their “regulations” and “standards” and “penalties for pollution” right?

          And they’re trying to make America “less great” by no longer being a mass-polluting post-war economic powerhouse! Think of the lost profits! Think of the widespread misery and poverty wrought by a secret New World Order of…(Paper flip) corporate regulation! What’s next? Unions?!

          Yes, chem trails are ultimately a path to such horrors as a less wealthy C-suite and not putting clean air on the commodities exchange market. (gasp)

          …And all these conspiracies are seeded and peddled by the very sources that told people to take veterinary dewormers or inject sanitizer to cure a virus, have brought us the highest unemployment rates seen in a century, dismantled and fired safety regulation and watchdog agencies (deh DERK-A-DURRBS!), are trying to bring back child labor and company towns, and conveniently rail against taxation which they dodge anyway.

          • hansolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Sure, but I think the cultural component of Agent Orange had a lot to do with it as well. That’s why it’s always sprayed by planes.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Uhhhhhmmmm akshually there are increased cancer rates near airports because, it turns out, setting jet fuel on fire and shoving it out of an engine to go fast leads to some of those chemicals settling into the land around concentrated flight paths.

      This is the unfortunate kernel of truth that sets the dummies tilting at conspiracy theories instead advocating for environmental regulation.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        That, and they put the mind control chemicals directly into the jet fuel. The pilots don’t even know they are complicit, just the government and the oil companies.

        /s

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    On the other hand, we have seen exhaust being very efficient in distributing chemicals with adverse health effects across the planet. Leaded gasoline was a huge oopsie that still has adverse health effects today.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Does it still cause harm? Or are people “just” still harmed by the exposure back then?

      • Thorry84@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it has gotten a lot better in the past 10 years, but there are still a lot of places where there is too much lead in the environment. It doesn’t degrade at all, so unless it’s dealt with it just stays there. Given we’ve only gotten rid of leaded gasoline less then 3 decades ago, the effects are still very much there.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        General aviation still uses leaded gas almost exclusively. It’s really hard to qualify replacements though the FAA, and airports don’t want to carry multiple fuel types.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve read that most of the lead from leaded gasoline is still in the environment, where it does cause harm. It it’s in the soil, and that can get into people through a variety of means.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t know if it’s universal but here every kid is tested for lead. When we did that, our pediatrician warned not to grow vegetables within 10’ of the house.

          For any house in the us built before mid 1970s you most likely had lead exterior paint Which would contaminate the soil. However they weren’t concerned about it still being concentrated enough to harm people directly, only if you ate contaminated vegetables

          The lead will never go away, but it does disperse, mix in, get covered over time

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              Northeast us. A big distinction is we were built out before most of the country. The land has been settled longer and you’re much more likely to find houses that have been around longer. Even when you find modern houses, they are likely on a lot previously having an older house. So, yeah, lead contamination is more likely than areas with more recent growth

              I have absolutely no idea how common lead testing is, but I also know most of the region trends blue, more likely to be aware of potential public health issues and do something about it

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I literally put it together in highschool when someone mentioned it to me after learning about how clouds form from nuclei.