Victim of Communism

  • 23 Posts
  • 4.62K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • there is. it’s just not translated as doxxing for some reason i can never understand:

    An early human flesh search dated back to March 2006, when netizens on Tianya Club collaborated to identify an Internet celebrity named “Poison” (simplified Chinese: 毒药; traditional Chinese: 毒藥; pinyin: dúyào). The man was found out to be a high-level government official.

    That doesn’t sound like a campaign of independent agents backed by the CCP to harass dissidents of the government. Just the opposite.

    In December 2008, the People’s Court in Beijing called it an alarming phenomenon because of its implications in “cyberviolence” and violations of privacy law. Human flesh searches are banned under the law.

    This is a radical departure from the American mainstream social media organizing that has often been encouraged, facilitated, and collaborated with by state and national government agencies.

    these already exist…

    Again, I’m sure there are folks on the internet with bad takes. I’ve yet to see an Alex Jones equivalent on the scale of “Mainstream, high profile internet show dedicated to denying the existence of school shooters as a pretext for imposing gun regulations”. When that kind of personality pops up on the Chinese internet, authorities tend to move quickly to censure and de-list their content.

    And a Chinese Tucker Carlson? What would that even look like? A Reagan-Era Maoist with family ties to the PLA who maintains an enormous following of Millennial / GenA viewers built on the back of qigong enthusiasts criticizing Xi Jinping from the Left? Seriously, name some names. I’d love to learn more about this individual.

    I’ve dipped my toe in the waters of Chinese media and you just don’t find these kinds of firebrand figures anywhere in the mainstream. If anything, my experience has been with very baby-brained paternalistic bullshit. Hour long shows that have people cosplaying as historical figures and a crowd of academics and talking heads all just nod along agreeing with one another. Entertainment idols and rising political stars jerking each other off to some banal socio-economic milestone or hagiographical rendition of past glories.

    If American media is All Red Meat All The Time, Chinese media is unseasoned tofu. It’s a totally different atmosphere.




  • Chinese Big Tech isn’t really known for innovation

    Innovation under Pressure: China’s Semiconductor Industry at a Crossroads

    For the first time among those watching these issues closely, the technological “choke point” strategy adopted by U.S. authorities across the late 2010s and early 2020s has now been shown to have failed, as Chinese government and R&D officials, as well as key state-backed and private sector firms, have been able to respond to the challenge forcefully and effectively. Leading the response are key policymakers: Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang, and the semiconductor team at the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), overseen by Vice Minister Xiangli Bin. A new AI-focused group at the NDRC overseen by Vice Minister Huang Ru is also increasingly important, as semiconductor and AI-related industry policies increasingly dovetail.

    Leading domestic foundry SMIC, for example, has faced pressure to manufacture Huawei’s most advanced chip designs by stretching existing foreign equipment to its limits. This includes deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography systems supplied by the Dutch firm ASML, which are being pushed beyond their intended capabilities, often resulting in low and inconsistent yields. The urgency stems from Huawei’s need for system-on-chip (SoC) processors for its consumer devices—especially smartphones, as well as for advanced AI chips in its Ascend 9XX series.

    Remind me, again. Who else was experimenting with deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography at scale prior to 2024? Who else was a front-runner in developing and deploying system-on-a-chip or AI embedding?

    That’s before you get into the EV sector, SMRs for bulk shipping, or the Chinese airplane and aerospace development.

    India, Korea, and Japan have all been in a scramble to keep up with the Chinese industrial programs. Meanwhile the US/EU don’t even seem to bother trying.















  • If the Chinese killed them, it’s relevant

    If the US killed them, it’s not relevant

    You cannot engage about the rightness/ wrongness of Chinese domestic policy without stopping to bash the United States

    :-/

    As of May 2026, the U.S. has deployed NMESIS (Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System) anti-ship missiles to the Philippines, specifically on islands near Taiwan.

    Why would a country worried about its sovereignty and domestic security be worried about a neighboring territory bulking up its military in their backyard? You can analyze the US policy towards Cuba by considering the Cuban Missile Crisis and its consequences. Why would Chinese politicians not have similar concerns with Taiwan and respond in kind? Why would Chinese policymakers be obligated to ignore the history of Cuba when making their own Taiwanese policies?