• 36 Posts
  • 3.22K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldMy husband is dead!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s funny how blonde hair and skin-tight pants can cause every Chud in a five mile radius to pop off.

    But holy hell, why do conservatives feel this aching desire to engage in endless plastic surgery? You’re 36 years old, girl. You were Miss Arizona when you had a normal looking face. Now you’ve gone through more noses than a clown at an MMA tournament.

    You don’t have to keep doing this to yourself. You’ve got tons of money. You’re under a six foot thick glass ceiling. There’s no upside to continuing this charade. You can just retreat to the country club, marry a Log Cabin Republican, fuck the pool boy, and enjoy your retirement.











  • I would initially tap the breaks on this, if for no other reason than “AI doing Q&A” reads more like corporate buzzwords than material policy. Big software developers should already have much of their Q&A automated, at least at the base layer. Further automating Q&A is generally a better business practice, as it helps catch more bugs in the Dev/Test cycle sooner.

    Then consider that Q&A work by end users is historically a miserable and soul-sucking job. Converting those roles to debuggers and active devs does a lot for both the business and the workforce. When compared to “AI is doing the art” this is night-and-day, the very definition of the “Getting rid of the jobs people hate so they can do the work they love” that AI was supposed to deliver.

    Finally, I’m forced to drag out the old “95% of AI implementations fail” statistic. Far more worried that they’re going to implement a model that costs a fortune and delivers mediocre results than that they’ll implement an AI driven round of end-user testing.

    Turning Q&A over to the Roomba AI to find corners of the setting that snag the user would be Gud Aktuly.


  • This catering to the rich and wealthy is exactly what caused the pilgrims to come to America

    Well, that and the 30 Years War, sure.

    The cycle or Religious bullshit must continue-

    The problem of lying is as ancient as the advent of human speech. Even if all formalized dogmatism vanished tomorrow, you’d still have people mistaking correlation for causation and developing superstitions and taboos as a result. Jordan B. Peterson is a great example of this in practice. In another time, he’d be a Joseph Smith or L. Ron Hubbard figure.

    But, at some level, any individual’s cache of information is going to be incomplete. We all rely on the grand game of telephone that is oral and written history. “The cycle of Religion” is just a facet of this cycle of generational retelling of accrued lore. How do you keep the logs accurate and the lorekeepers faithful to accumulated wisdom? Damned if I know. Double-entry book keeping seems to help, but its hardly foolproof.





  • The structure of the economy has changed fundamentally. And so the goals of these privately bankrolled institutions have changed with it.

    Churches, as institutions, no longer aspire to maximize the number of middle class bodies in pews, because the middle class is no longer flush with surplus cash. Instead, they need to attract extraordinarily wealthy individual patrons to survive. To that end, church officials making a spectacle of casting out a single kid from a non-wealthy family for being “Woke” operates as a kind-of fundraising event for the patrician class.

    Modern religious institutions don’t exist to tame and homogenize a frontier population’s moral code. They now serve to legitimize and promote high ranking officials as More Holy Than Thou. And as churches gain more roles of state government, its the public that has to ask special dispensation to join the church, not the other way around.





  • she was commenting more generally about tedious chore-type activities versus fun, creative activities.

    No, I get that. I just find that much of the tedious work has already been automated about as far as is practical. Everything afterwards requires the kind of manual dexterity and human cognition to accomplish that machines have never done well.

    I’ll spot you that we’re talking about multiple trillions of dollars in national investments. And that could be going to high speed rail lines and supersonic jets. It could be going to massive solar/wind farms and upgraded drainage/wastewater recycling. It could be going to nuclear power for ecological preservation and nationalized health care.

    That’s not “automation” in the household sense. But all of these investments would take industrial infrastructure to leverage economies of scale and meaningfully improve the quality of life of hundreds of millions of people by saving them time and personal expenses. If you care about saving people’s time from tedium, there’s improvements we could make. But they aren’t consumer household improvements so much as civil engineering projects.