IT just means they learned how to sidestep that particular bureaucratic hurdle when the idea was repeated in 2001.

Wait till you hear how people measure the height of horses.

In economics, many indices start at 100.

This is a Halloween cocktail

If the effect were meaningful it should be possible to establish it

Effects have been established in mice. Do we want to risk lives by establishing it in humans, or just recommend that people not live close to high voltage lines.

EMFs are very dangerous. Particularly at the gamma end of the spectrum.

Obviously not bullshit

Well I’m glad we’ve gone from no possibility whack jobs to scientific investigation for safety sake.

You have obviously grossly misunderstood my comments.

I suggest you make yourself a nice herbal tea, sit down and reread our interactions.

If you mutate rats then they start training turtles ninja skills.

There is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of 50 Hz magnetic fields in relation to childhood leukaemia (from epidemiological studies). This is why IARC classified them in group 2B, as possibly carcinogenic to humans

There is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of 50 Hz magnetic fields in relation to childhood leukaemia (from epidemiological studies). This is why IARC classified them in group 2B, as possibly carcinogenic to humans. This is from the website that funded the study against the “whack jobs”.

Wow. So much anger. Why?

Yes a gopro has a screen but you only have to poke the lens through a hole in a bag or piece of clothing to have something superior and better camouflaged than chunky glasses.

Again I’m not arguing against your dislike of smart glasses, but you are missing the forest for the trees.

Only small parts of specific algorithms get a boost from quantum computing. I could imagine the NAG library offering quantum as a service for some of their routines

Electromagnetic radiation from power lines linked to increased leukemia risk in mice

But they have shit lenses and crap sensors

Gopros are 4k and can be much less visible than chunky glasses.

keep advocating for the perverts

Strange logic. You are hyperfocused on a particular product. I’m highlighting the more serious concerns. Neither of us are “advocating for the perverts”.

Type shirt button camera into Google. Those are even less obvious than chunky glasses.

The problem is the blackmail perverts not the tech. (Athough metas glasses are a privacy nightmare by design).

This is not about smart glasses.

holding a glass slab in front of someone’s face is a lot more likely to be clocked.

So pervert blackmailers switch to button cameras. They are cheaper and even less obvious than thick black ray bans.

Not sure. I’m worried about a imperial/ metric mixup.

In theory all this will be banned:-

• Encouraging revenge
• Celebrating cruelty or injustice
• Promoting hatred toward others
• Lying, gossip, slander
• Manipulative or deceptive talk
• Speech intended to harm reputations
• Excessive focus on wealth or luxury
• Encouraging exploitation for profit
• Envy or covetousness
• Addictive behaviors (including Instagram, candy crush etc.)
• Promoting disobedience to parents
• Promoting disobedience against governing authorities
• Encouraging disorder or lawlessness

“Can I get a refill?”

“Supersize me”