Soup, soup. A tasty soup, soup. A spicy carrot and coriander.

Microsoft’s technology specialist are top notch regarding their own product. The other 90% are sales(wo)men and their managers.

Windows is about 10% of Microsoft revenue

They are sold at a loss, so you are technically stealing from Zuckerberg directly.

Totally agree. At the moment the Meta involvement is tolerable, but all it takes is a couple of forced ads or intrusive personal information demands.

Meta Quest was the last innovative games console.

You’re damn right I’m using up all 140 characters in this text.

Yep. I could send messages with my hand in my pocket.

I couldn’t read them though.

I have a slight cold and mispronounced this as muddy pigeon. Now I’m caked in it.

Depends. Are you storing and consuming your data or someone else’s?

Your data -> Native apps

Their data -> Web apps

Again. The DNC are campaigning for transparency. Not less money.

Captain, the goalpost is running away!

I’m consistently defending the statement that the Democrats (and the Republicans) DO NOT want to remove money from politics.

They may be arguing for more transparency, but they definitely are not asking for less lovely money.

Democrats will also fight to strengthen public financing with small-dollar matching for all federal candidates

In addition to private contributions, they want tax money too. Additional lovey money.

ban all private financing from federal elections.

Hang on. What about the dollar matching. You can’t have both. Also, private financing is free to supply lovely money at all other times.

and crack down on foreign nationals who try to influence elections.

“Crack down” is not defined. Foreign donations to foundations like the Clinton’s are unlikely to be affected.

We will keep super PACs wholly independent of campaigns and parties

But they will still exist to funnel all that lovely money.

Democrats will end “dark money” by requiring full disclosure of contributors and ban 501©(4) organizations from spending on elections.

“Light” lovely money will still be accepted.

Democrats will prohibit corporate PACs and lobbyists from donating to anyone they lobby.

But corporate PACs will still be able to give the DNC lovey money.

The DNC is not trying to reduce the money they are receiving.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71209929/4chan-community-support-llc-v-uk-office-of-communications/

No no. Politicans still want all that lovely money.

The dems put forward the proposal on page 48 to say that they want transparency, because that fucks over the Republicans more than them.

Oh yes. Not all stablecoins are good. But the original point was that crypto was dumb because it was volatile.

USDC is backed by banks and is regularly audited. They are not shady or anonymous.

The downside is that it is that stablecoin are not federally insured, although USDC accounts were bailed out when SVB went bust.

What makes you think they want to remove money from politics? The Dems made $1.5bn last election.

What makes them stable?

They are backed by treasury bonds

And how has that stability been more stable than tech stocks?

They are comparable to other company bonds. Much more stable than shares.

Individual share also fall 10% regularly.

If you weight you portfolio by asset value then 0.2% should be in crypto.