The advantage of datacenters in space is that the peasants can’t break in and sabotage your equipment.

If that’s your criteria, put servers in containers and sink them in the ocean. Bonus, no cooling problems.

I was about to post an erm ackshually but I checked my facts.

An urban myth holds the name “World Series” came from a putative sponsorship by the New York World newspaper. The earliest such claim found by Snopes was made in 1991

Or maybe something interesting happens in the last 10mims

https://www.creativebloq.com/3d/video-game-design/unreal-engines-ai-push-sparks-backlash-as-developers-fear-the-end-of-blueprints

Why do people think that gta6 content will be stored locally?

And where do I get cornstarch in prison eh? Eh?

…

Oh yeah. I’m not in prison.

I am offended that nobody is offended.

No I’m not

Yes I am

Etc.

I imagine moses uses the same technique for oral.

French women are notoriously unshaven.

Blame the Brazilians. It’s named after them.

How about pirate comics?

Money and power is the explanation.

The critical thinking required is to admit that someone under the age of consent cannot consent. The attractive rock star is just as evil as the hideous Epstein client.

exaggeration is acceptable as long as the general idea is true,

Totally disagree. If the goal is to influence someone’s opinion, in any forum, then it will remain their opinion longer if it solidly fact based, without exaggeration.

even hyperbolic exaggeration.

Obvious hyperbolic statements can be very useful. They increase enjoyment for the billions of lemmy readers and make them more receptive.

Conversations don’t stop and wait for you to look up something that ultimately is at best a minor correction

However, in this format that luxury exists.

because it’s not needed and frankly its silly.

It is needed because otherwise it damages the argument.

Constantly moving goal posts in order to discredit a true fact because the way it was presented is not precise.

If you notice, my contributions have not touched any goalposts. Encouraging accuracy is not changing the argument.

Which is what?

Note, I’m not disagreeing with the guy. I’m helping them make better arguments.

If you want to argue scientifically, you have to be precise.

My point stands

But your stats are from your ass.

Camera is needed for this

An inward facing eye camera is not an issue.

Elon knows it’s too expensive to incorporate lidar data into his product line.

My spelling was way odd. I mean Etymology.

Clarkson got in trouble for noticing a slant on a bridge. I didn’t even realise he was being offensive.