• 2 Posts
  • 2.03K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 23rd, 2024

help-circle













  • Everything is contextual and interconnected, but it was Lysenkoism, only possible under authorianism, that broke the core structural principle of a central command economy.

    Lysenkoism isn’t a reference to the actions of Lysenko, it refers to the entire system of failures that created it.

    Lysenko’s politically derived pseudoscience that started with ideology instead of evidence combined with Stalinist/Maoist paranoia and conflation of scientific dissent with rebellion and threats to the state created the famines from what would have been shortages during the restructuring.

    That is all (and more) described by the term.


  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.socialtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHrmmmmm
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    If you don’t want to understand why a system that forced workers and scientists to lie about production numbers or get shot caused famines during industrial centralization and was the absolute worst thing to have happening concurrently with a direct causal link in two separate countries I can’t make you.


  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.socialtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHrmmmmm
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yes, eventually the industrialization of Soviet farming paid off despite his nonsense.

    Doesn’t stop it from being the major cause (beyond deliberate genocidal policies) of the interwar famines. As you can provably see when it spread to Mao’s newly formed Chinese state and, surprise, caused famines again when they didn’t have the sheer output of an industrialized agrarianian sector to make up for it.

    The Four Pests Campaign obviously didn’t help in that regard but Lysenkoism was part and parcel of it, with Mao officially adopting it as state policy and Lysenkoism trained advisors setting specific policy goals.