I mean, I’m as much of a gooner as the next guy but if you don’t think the one on the right is hot that’s a you problem.
We do. It just doesnt feel any less empty inside.
It’s not even a horny thing, but the one on the left is just too distracting. I’d be staring at it the whole time just trying to figure out why Supergirl made that choice.
Her thighs would always be cold. Any major combat movement is going to make her bits show. It looks like she literally cut her shorts into that shape.
Like… I like attractive women too, but come on, guys. There’s no way in hell she’d wear her costume like that. I’d just be annoyed by it the whole time.
It wouldn’t be fair if Superman got underpants and Supergirl didn’t.
Why is the word porn censored?
Someone else already answered the why. What I think the best reaction is when you see this kind of bullshit censorship is just down vote it.
Because we normalized self-censorship to make it more palatable to everyone. Which is stupid.
Make it more palatable to advertisers
Sex is too important to be left to porn.
Not saying this guy in particular is right, but I hate this attitude that “porn exists so we shouldn’t have sex, or nudity, or anything horny in other art forms”. We shouldn’t treat people like creeps just because they want more horny in mainstream art.
I find the current cinema trend of “everyone is beautiful, but no one is horny” far creepier than the rampant sexualization in old 80s movies.
Afaict, nobody is making the argument that you’re refuting.
There is art that is elevated by being horny and art that is made worse by it. Being horny doesn’t fit this character, and isn’t relevant to the story being told, so it seems like a bad fit. Being a bad fit, the only people this would benefit are creeps who want upskirt shots of whoever, and I don’t think that’s a demographic to cater to at the sacrifice of the more vulnerable demographics that this film is targeting.
porn in america is hyper-aggressive and focused on penetration. there’s no eroticism to it. it’s crass and disgusting.
there’s something to putting on a 90s skinemax film and seeing hot milfs wearing sexy, satin nighties tenderly riding men on a real bed in a real bedroom, instead of watching giant, unearthly cocks penetrating gaping vaginas in extreme close-up.
what a boneheaded take out of the OP.
there’s a HUGE difference between what porn is selling and what turns you on.
Maybe don’t sexualize the character that, at least in part, is aimed at teenage girls.
See, that’s an example of a much better argument than “porn exists, stop being a creep”.
The point of the post and the reason for calling the guy a creep (I say guy because we’re definitely dealing with a male here) is because he wants a movie that is not designed to be pornography to have elements that would be better placed in a pornographic movie. You are inserting a degree of kink shaming into the post that doesn’t actually exist. Watching pornography and having a healthy attitude about sex is different from wanting to sexualize a story that is not trying to be sexual. That is creepy.
Edit: deleted unnecessary sentence
Again, I’m not defending this particular guy - I’m criticizing the response, which is an attitude that’s prevelant today, especially amongst the youth. A lot of people hate on sex/nudity of any form in mainstream art, and their argument is generally “just go watch porn you creeps”.
Maybe Supergirl specifically shouldn’t be sexualized (even though she’s sexualized in most of the source material I remember), but if so, let’s come up with a better reason than “a containment genre exists for sex, and if you want to see it escape that box then you’re a degenerate!”.
the actress is probably 35, who cares who the character is aimed at. it’s normal for men to see an attractive woman and be like ‘wow she’s attractive.’
you’re pathologizing normal thinking and probably feeling incredibly satisfied with your lame response because you used the word ‘teenage’ and nobody would dare to cross swords.
grow up.
why is her outfit ‘sexualizing’ anyway?
even if her outfit didn’t suggest ‘panties’ it’d still be sexy because it accentuates her form.
If the left outfit is better for doing super stuff then Superman needs to wear a speedo.
he does, with long johns on underneath.
maybe one of the elephant trunk undies.
What we want: henry cavill in the exact outfit on the left
What we got: henry cavill in the normal superman outfit
Not pictured: an AI rendering of the above, because do we really need to spend resources on that?
“Yes, we must acceleray the atmospheric cooking of the planet to make an uncanny valley rendition of a meme we have already clearly explained with words that maybe a dozen people will see and exhale out their nose breifly at” - too many people, for some reason
May I have Henry Cavilll in the outfit on right too?

Fixed
What

I can’t believe I missed those. Here’s the final fixed version
Is this loss?
This is my exact stance. I want my porn separate from my non-porn.
People that just have badonkulous jiggle physics blasting while they play a normal game baffle me.
I get you but also I feel like this is an unrealized pushback to just how sanitized a lot of mainstream culture has become. I feel like a lot of media up until about the 2010s give or take had a lot of sexual elements without being porn outright and while not necessarily being erotic, it really does feel like a weird bit of cultural puritanism especially given how hot a lot of actors are.
In summary a lot of things are hot but basically nothing is sexy and it’s weird.
I’m like this about food.
I like my candy and food to be separate. All this candy-masquerading-as-food, like sweetened yogurt and cranberry sauce, can get bent.
If your cranberry sauce is that sweet it has too much sugar in it. It should be sharp and sexy, not sweet and not-as-sexy-yet-more-conventially-appealing
It is bloody irritating when there’s anime boobies in my face, while trying to loot my enemies for every resource they have.
As a woman, I kinda thought for a second that the costume on the left looks kinda cool. Then I remembered chub rub exists and visibly recoiled. It would be so painful to walk around in that jfc
Yes, but what about Bubb Rubb?

Whoopp whhoooooppp!
That’s only in the morning.
Left hand image doesn’t even look like her usual costume so where tf did he get that idea from
There’s probably something from the 90s/early 00s with her dressed like that. Comics were really ramping it up for a while there. Not that teenager me was complaining.
deleted by creator
i like it when my pornography creeps up in non-porn places, but that’s because my crippling addiction to porn has made porn boring
recently i even jerked off to a rubik’s cube because it was the least porn thing i could think of
that slutty-ass cube

Hehe, ass-cube
Nothing wrong with mixing it up a little
Underrated cube pun
porn addiction is just a symptom of serotonin deficiency
serotonin defiiciency
Meh.
Your brain just reflects life.
A porn addiction more likely means you’re lacking rewarding activities in your life and/or you’re avoiding thinking about by jerking it.
And FWIW the whole serotonin theory of depression is demonstrably bunk.
we’re saying the same thing: understimulated reward centre. and i never mentioned depression.
Who is Sarah and where are the videos of her toning her body
No, not that kind of toning. Sara’s toning the fish in the sea.
Ah, atoning for her fins.
Today I learned and now I will be googling
I’ve been looking into this and your advice seems very sound
Me too fella!
Rubik’s cubes tease so much. All I want to do is click it in all the right places. But that smooth little box edges me for days never letting me cum to completion.
I have yet to finish, been gooning the cube for decades. When I finally slide that last square into place, I’m going to bust so fucking hard.
Your p*rnography*, you f*cking p*rvert.
C*nsorship is my kink.
🤤 redact this ****
****** to **** until *** *******
Let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.
Say goodbye to these!
You know, in ancient Greece super man and women were nude.
Tell me more…
Just read the Princess of Mars (or John Carter of Mars depending on how you wanna look at it) series by Edgar Rice Borroughs. Literally everyone is naked and doing crazy superhuman shit.
This isn’t a power girl movie and the actress playing supergirl is nowhere near buxom enough to play her even if it were one. Supergirl’s outfit has never looked like the left.
In much of her history, she’s also quite young. Young enough to live in an orphanage in the golden age before getting foster/adoptive parents. Sometimes she’s an adult in the 20-24ish range. But it seems like every time the canon gets reset for her she’s canonically 16 again. And as such she’s almost always dressed pretty reasonably by Superheroine standards.
She almost always wears a skirt and briefs, if not shorts, tights, pants or full legged unitard. Don’t know that she has ever been depicted as particularly busty.
In fact, it is a running gag that her Earth 2 counterpart, Powergirl, is famously quite busty and confident his her body (boob window and all), particularly in comparison to Supergirl.
For comparison sake:

Supergirls depiction here is more sexualised than the left example in the OP imo
Lol I was about to say, that’s “pretty reasonably” dressed"?
Her shoulders are covered?
“By superheroine standards” is the key here. Going by how they’re often depicted, I would say this could qualify as “pretty reasonable”.
We can, at least, identify her exactly in the film, as she celebrates her 23rd birthday












