The Chinese United Front are testing a series of backbone organizations and assets for readiness. The final attack will coincide with major world events and obscure readiness and communications.

This will be done via disconnecting several relates levels of internet functionality so that even their repair measure will still seem unresolved. They will reconfigure and retry, unaware that their problem is solved, it’s the other levels/locations of the internet’s function that are still broken (so can’t be tested against).

This will provide extended cover that could last days or weeks. So far testing of this plan has been going well.

deleted by creator

You have to slice a fry it on low heat (so that the psychedelics survive)… Of course you should check the gills don’t go all the way to the stem, and make sure the spore print (leave the cap on some black paper overnight) comes out white.

Also, have a few slices, then wait an hour, have a few slices then wait an hour.

Hank hasn’t been the same after what that dolphin did to him.

It’s the same as the tomato juice in gespatcho soup right? A cold soup.

Pretty sure Prince Phillip is dead.

deleted by creator

Magnesioom

The shitpost-to-boomer-humour pipeline is very real.

A cloud storage company shouldn’t need to “compute” anything, it should already know where the data is, or is going.

I’m putting words in your mouth? You’re raising AI art and data centers when that’s nothing to do with the two statements I’m talking about.

…and no, the things I posted aren’t responding to Hank Green (I never said they were), they’re about the specific statements. You can go to the latest SciShow episode about Ai and find the Maths Olympiad statement.

You’re doing this because you want to talk past me to show boat for up votes. I don’t care about that man.

You can goto his personal channel and find his lastes video on AI and find his statement saying AI will only get better from here.

You want to have some dumb internet debate and pretend like I’m against Hank Green or pro AI or some shit.

I pointed out two statements that are clearly wrong, that Hank Green is endorsing as true.

I don’t give a shit about all this other crap you’ve raised to muddy the waters. So piss off.

I gave the two specific statements that I’m saying are incorrect and provided evidence for that. You feeling weird about me criticising him for endorsing statements that (the links show) aren’t true. I never said all his statements are incorrect. My problem is his beliefs in the two statements I’m pointing out. Hence pointing them out.

Yep, as the joke suggests:

GPT-4 didn’t ace the bar exam after all, MIT research suggests — it didn’t even break the 70th percentile

Yet people, even Science Communicators like Hank Green on YouTube have been making claims like this. In a recent video on his personal channel he claimed “AI” will only get better from here. On Sci Show he claimed GPT could compete in the Maths Olympiad.

…it’s NOT able to compete in the maths Olympiad.

Hank Green is spreading misinformation.

Hunter Biden.

That they could detect. The actual number is probably a little higher.

Yeah, that one doesn’t work well at all.

PSA if your car’s belts or breaks are squeeling, replace them. They’re designed to be noisy at the end of their lifespan, it’s supposed to let you know to replace them.

Drove on squeely belts for years, the snap. Engine boiled.

Musical chairs with fascist billionaires.

We should have jrobs.

Bought from OAN’s shopping channel.