Using an AI is a great way to get learning materials tailored specifically to you.

But after you’ve learned from it, before you move on to another topic, you HAVE to verify your understanding against more trustworthy sources that you previously couldn’t understand. Ideally with an online course that actually gives you a test.

I didn’t get it until I read this lol

Vehicle combat games. Which I guess is more like a genre than a mechanic.

Right now it’s basically Mariokart or nothing.

Grip came out in 2018, but the physics were really unforgiving (clipping a corner could cost you like 10 seconds as you tumble) and there weren’t enough players online.
Which is a real shame because it’s gorgeous, fast paced, with effective power ups, and amazing tracks. And a hell of a sound track.

The thing new games don’t have that I miss from old games is friends to play the game with 😭

In an open world game that isn’t about racing*

Games like wreckfest have pretty great damage modeling. BeamNG too.

I really want to see a god game with gestures, like black&white, make the jump to VR

Like in the finals, kinda?

Speaks Cantonese, but the “dog accent” is so thick that nobody can understand

I also didn’t known it was a song, so the song never entered the Canadian consciousness either. The joke has existed for a while in various forms,, I just picked it up from that. Sometimes in a more faithful reproduction of the “I can’t drive either” joke, but often just riffing on super religious people not even attempting to save themselves or others in emergency situations, or especially in situations that are overblown into emergencies. I sometimes see it used as an ironic replacement for “YOLO” when you know you’re about to do something dumb and you don’t care. Shipping buggy code to prod, riding down a big hill in a shopping cart, buying a meme stock, etc.

Not the way I misread “block” to replace the o with an a. “I see this as an absolute win”

It’s just a “Jesus take the wheel” joke.
The humor is in the absurdity itself.

Can’t answer my questions, then huh?
Do you have any theories on why you resorted to ad hominem instead?

Important to note:

LLMs absolutely do not use logic.

How would that help? his eyes are closed. Didn’t you read it?

Like holy shit why would you see this and thick that OP is really doing this for real?

You saw a joke and you though “this just be what most people truly believe”?

Can you walk me through how you reached that conclusion?

So go to one of those campsites inaccessible by car and spend a couple days

advice dumb. People […] give better advice.

Not my comment flying straight over your head. That reply typifies what I’m talking about.

What advice do you think the joke was giving? Why would you think a joke is providing actual advice? Why would you think that actual advice is a useful response to a joke?
Even if it wasn’t funny, if you recognize it as a joke, none of the behavior makes sense. This smells strongly of lying to save face.

Once again, I can’t tell if you’re too autistic to understand a joke, or I’m too autistic to understand your advanced satire.

Not without other tradeoffs.

There is no map projection that gets everything correct, because a 3d surface cannot be accurately projected onto a 2d surface without loss.

You can get projections that accurately show size, but not shape.
Or accurately show size and shape of landmass, but oceans get warped.
Etc. if you want accuracy you need a globe.

Map projections always have inaccuracies, they make deliberate tradeoffs.

The common Mercator projection allows the long and lat lines to be straight, but it means shapes near the poles get stretched.

Some projections do a better job of accurately portraying shapes at the sacrifice of size.
Some can do shape an size of landmass, but the oceans are distorted.
Etc, all projections have compromises.