Ah, my misunderstanding

Taint to tip is the superior standard

Billionaires aren’t corrupt, they’re ethically bankrupt; they’re the corrupt_ors_.
Government officials are corrupt because they’ve been corrupted by the billionaire corruptors.

Getting rid of the billionaires solves both problems at once.

It’s always funny to me when people say to put the billionaires in charge, it’s always just like

The farmer is doing a bad job because they just let the fox into the henhouse, so instead we should put the fox in charge of the henhouse. The fox is best suited for the job because they have a lot of experience with hens and they know all the problems with the henhouses.

Personally I start measuring from the middle of my taint 😌

But what that tongue do, tho?

Work life balance 🤣

Hey, I’m just giving you constructive criticism. Broaden your understanding of language before criticizing the language of others.

It’s ironic that the people who are the loudest about the literacy crisis seem to have such a narrow understanding of “literacy”.

Folks these days will never know the luxury of a digital camera.

I once scanned my dick on a flat bed scanner.

Being a language pedant is nothing to be proud of. The actual linguists don’t take that that position, you’re just performing for Internet points

Did you just suggest Linux has no vulnerabilities in any of its distros, and neither does any of the self-hosted services?

Afraid people will use known vulnerabilities in common self-hosted software.

So every answer is as good as you can get?

I’m afraid of security bugs in the software I’m using, so that containers don’t contain, read-only doesn’t prevent writing, mounting directories doesn’t restrict access to those directories, etc.

I’m a nobody, I can’t imagine anyone targeting me or my random domain, but I can imagine getting swept up in a net of attacks of opportunities targeting hosted software with known vulnerabilities, or injected supply chain vulnerabilities, so I want to reduce my attack surface as much as I can (while still actually letting the people I want to access it actually access it)

I’m kinda disappointed with this thread, I’m in a similar position to OP, but all the responses are just like “use a reverse proxy and make your URL hard to guess” and other measures which are not very secure. \

It seems like that’s about as good as you can get at the moment, because the mobile apps barf if you try to add in auth in front of the reverse proxy, but a lot of people seem to be providing this advice like it’s good enough rather than as good as you can get.

Some reverse proxies have an authentication layer.
But this typically breaks the jellyfin Mobile app.

Idk if geo whitelisting is really good enough. I can’t speak for OP, but I’m in the same position and I don’t. I had high hopes for the post but everyone seems to just brush over the “secure” part

How do you get the mobile app to connect?

If bosses are the ones who give you jobs, then bosses are the ones who take the jobs.

If immigrants are the ones who took your jobs, then bosses were never the ones who gave you jobs.

So either immigrants didn’t take your job, or billionaires don’t create jobs. You can’t have both. God I wish redpills could connect their own dots.

This would imply they’re surprised to see each other doing what they’re doing, which they absolutely aren’t