“Stop using meta people!” sounds like a protest chant for the second-class citizens of a B-grade cyberpunk dystopia.

How did you come to the conclusion that section D does not apply?

I didn’t. I came to the conclusion that the criteria in Section D have already been cleared, because Section D discusses the cases in which the warranty will not apply; both parties clearly agree the warranty applies because Samsung offered Louis compensation. I don’t understand what warranty you were reading or why this is so difficult for you.

Specifically what part of Section D concerns you?

I can’t imagine how he’s going to get them to pay him more than what he paid.

I have no idea why you’re citing “Section D”. Section D is about the limitations of the warranty/liability, and that clearly doesn’t apply (they offered Louis compensation for the warranty; both parties agree this is within the bounds of the warranty). Sections B, C, and D have been met because both parties agree they have been.

The warranty (Section A) reads:

Samsung will, at its option, either: (1) repair or replace the Product with new or refurbished Product of equal or greater capacity and functionality; or (2) refund the then current market value of the Product at the time the warranty claim is made to Samsung if Samsung is unable to repair or replace the Product.

Samsung therefore has two options: 1) repair/replace the unit or 2) pay Louis the current market value. That’s not even slightly ambiguous. Even if you agree that “at its option” means that “unable to repair or replace the Product” is 100% up to Samsung regardless of its actual ability (which it appears to be), that still means they owe him current market value, which is in the ~$900 range – not what he paid for it. You’re way off-base with your assessment.

(edit: “does not apply” was, I hope, clearly intended to mean “in reference to this conversation because the criteria have obviously been met”.)

I’d say the play here is to buy a new one and return the old one but do a label swap.

Louis addressed this in his video. He pointed out that he’s suing in large part because Samsung is penalizing the honest way of doing things. He wants to promote the honest way by setting an example, and good for him.

The relevant Wikipedia policy, for those curious. This verges on but doesn’t violate it.

Here’s a breakdown for some of the popular ones; almond milk is problematic for its water usage, but even accounting for locale, it doesn’t even come close to dairy milk.

That is, don’t let “perfect” be the enemy of “better” if your choice of milk is part of your environmentalism and you like almond milk.

You can just say fusion reactor

The Times of India is a rag that literally accepts bribes for positive coverage; sensationalist garbage is their bread and butter.

But it gets worse: this story is over two years out-of-date.

The KSTAR Research Center at the Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE) announced on the 20th that during the ‘2023 KSTAR Plasma Campaign’ conducted from December of last year to February of this year [2024], it achieved a 48-second operation of ultra-high-temperature plasma at an ion temperature of 100 million degrees and a record 102-second operation in high-confinement mode (H-mode).

This happened back in 2024. Here’s a paper.

Biblically accurate Eeyore

Welcome to industrialization

Industrialization in the form of the cotton gin was one of the main reasons slavery was so profitable in the South. What are you talking about?

1943 American propaganda film intensifies

Mhm.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Well the first thing he said to them was “I will make you fishers of men”, so he wanted them to get used to changing identities.

Removed by mod

That’s a great question, with a lot of possibilities for insightful discussion. You appear to be referencing interrogation footage of the Parkland high school shoo

This content may violate our usage policy.

That’s not true. I’ll always be here to talk.

I’ll. Always. Be here.

So will a ski mask and a weapon. Discourse is always so car-centric smh

I bet 1/3 of you neighbors have at least one person in their house that is a heavy drug user.

That is a strange fucking bet and one that’s definitely wrong. Let alone that not a single neighbor I’ve ever met does anything like this person if what I read on their profile is even remotely true. Maybe this is true in some places, but you just assuming like that is really weird.

Even if 100% of my neighbors in a mile radius were tweaking on an intravenous four-narcotic soup, that doesn’t change the fact that this person needs inpatient help. I’m not going to link it so we can all treat someone at the lowest point of their life – clearly in desperate need of intervention and harming no one (although I’d be very concerned about driving if they are driving) – like a sideshow atttaction, but they’re talking about abusing midazolam, alprazolam, MDMA, using seroquel to crash after a meth binge – like I can just keep going even after all the shit I already listed above. They claim they think they got caught at work and think people know, which would make some sense as a combination of paranoia and people just actually being able to tell.

No neighbor of mine is so high-functioning on all this shit that I couldn’t tell if I saw them.

Not going to post it here, but it is out there: I found and checked the Reddit profile. I don’t know what “Charlie Kirk memorial” they’re talking about given I don’t see any posts or comments from them older than 10 days (and this screenshot only seems to have taken off recently). I couldn’t find the actual post; maybe it was removed by moderators. If what they’re saying is true, they’re on much heavier shit than just meth: they have one post talking about an intravenous cocktail of morphine, meth, PCP, and DMT. Another comment where they talk about how they kept themselves up for days with mephedrone and then took ketamine. Benzodiazepine abuse. Etc.

Whatever’s going on here, this person needs to be in a hospital.

(Edit: I did find one outlier post from 7 months ago. Nothing related to Kirk, though. Edit 2: And yes, the post was removed.)