• 7101334@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age, setting AB 1043 apart from similar laws passed in Texas and Utah that require “commercially reasonable” verification methods, such as government-issued ID checks.

    I hate Newsom but this seems like a non-issue.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      If it was a non-issue they wouldn’t introduce this to begin with.

      There’s not a single good reason to why an OS would ever need to know someone’s age.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yes but Newsom says funny things about bad orange man, so he’s got my vote.

  • Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Its parents that are pushing for this stupid shit. I hate that the majority of voters want to implement robust age verification.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age, setting AB 1043 apart from similar laws passed in Texas and Utah that require “commercially reasonable” verification methods, such as government-issued ID checks.

    What even is the point of this then? To make shitty parents feel better?

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    OK Newsom, you’ve lost me. I enjoyed your chaotic responses to the drumpf but you’ve officially lost me.

    • treesquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      He’s not even making most of those responses to Trump. His social media manager is doing it. He’s still just another Howard Schultz. “I like the idea of equality as long as rich people don’t have to reduce the rate at which they become richer.”

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Realize, this has always been him. He is NOT a liberal. He is a conservative who calls himself a democrat.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Despite signing it, Newsom issued a statement urging the legislature to amend the law before its effective date, citing concerns from streaming services and game developers about “complexities such as multi-user accounts shared by a family member and user profiles utilized across multiple devices.”

    then why did you fucking sign it in the first place??

    words cannot describe the depths of my seething hatred for the complete, museum grade, massive piece of shit that is Gavin Newsom

    • BranBucket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Because it’s a metric, a bullet point, and campaign speech fodder. Newsome thinks of his position in terms of a career rather than an office, his job isn’t to lead a nation towards what’s right or wrong, it’s to pander so that he can be re-elected or elected to higher office.

      The bullshit way that lobbying groups conduct polling and market research means they he’s chronically out of touch and that his focus is on perpetuating his time in office so he can continue to “represent the people”, making a calling out of bowing to the desires of the mis-informed, outraged, panicked mob he believes his electorate to be instead of actually having a spine and exercising good judgement.

      The consequences of shoddy legislation take second place to being able to declare he did something to “keep kids safe”. It doesn’t even have to work, all that matters is having something to wave around and back up that claim. Something to placate the plebeians and let him continue to do what he does best… listen to lobbyists who are lying about what people think.

      Why? Because that’s what gets people elected these days. Despite being on a foundation of pure bullshit, somehow it works. So he goes along with it, encourages it, and remains in office as a result.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Why not parents responsible for their own goddamn kids? Stop interfering with the rest of our privacy for this bullshit. Parental controls have existed for decades. Fucking use them.