Have a nice day.

When you acted exasperated at having to explain something, for example. Or now, asking for proof that you were mad. These things are not done in normal, polite conversation.

So you literally got mad at a made-up scenario in your head?

And why would this particular law exempt Azure Linux only and specifically?

I meant that the law is easily bypassed, for example by not implementing what you described. Good point nonetheless.

What does that have to do with anything?

I’m not saying I’m smarter than you but to me it looks like “Hey yeah we require age verification. So, anyway…”

A token easily bypassed “verification” law to set and forget. It’s basically the same level of security corrently keeping teenage boys off of PornHub.

Microsoft’s own servers run Linux. An in-house build IIRC named Azure Linux.

Your average legislator hears the word “Docker” and imagines a ship unloading cargo. Of course computers on ships need age verification! Voters will appreciate a crackdown on nautical child labor.

I was referring to The Lord of the Rings.

So tue tldr is just what we already knew: LLMs predict the most likely word to come next and have no concept of “true” or “false” information.

Indeed, to have such a concept would require understanding that information and any AI that actually understood information wouldn’t be an LLM because LLMs are just fancy autocorrect.

“Seems” being the operating word here. But children think that Muppets are conscious. People lose their temper at self-checkout machines. Faithful of different religions attribute will and power to all sorts of idols and other inanimate objects like supposed fragments of a specific cross. The most famous work of fantasy fiction is about a malevolent piece of jewelry. Humans are very good at attributing consciousness to non-conscious entities. We are easily fooled in this respect.

Even if some putative AI may be conscious, an LLM is just something that looks up words in a database with probability weights attached. This technology cannot lead to consciousness.

What a terribly misleading post title.

The post title contains literally the entire OnlyOffice-related content of the article, which is titled “Why ODF and not OOXML”. Here’s the first paragraph:

Many interpreted the last article in this series as an attack on Microsoft for using the OOXML format against users’ interests. However, this was only one of my objectives, as I also wanted to raise users’ awareness of fake open-source software, such as OnlyOffice, which partners with Microsoft in a strategy to lock users in.

Everything after this is about closed vs open standards.

Nice.

They’re all for downloading copyrighted content or for performing auxiliary functions to downloading copyrighted content (e.g. Bazaar downloads subtitle files, which aren’t copyrighted), not for torrenting specifically. You can use Usenet clients or torrent clients as backend.

What alternative do you recommend for watching YouTube on a PC?

You shouldn’t present a biased take from developer drama as fact. ReVanced is fine.

It’s very slightly diuretic, but that effect is overshadowed by the fact that it’s 99% water. Coffee actually hydrates you.

This is very cool. I didn’t know about Meshtastic or MeshExec.

The paper is wrong.