I mean…Logan Paul didn’t seem to have much of an issue against Tyson.

How’s Lana’s blocking? I bet I could knock her out easier that I could knock out Tyson.

What is he doing with Norm McDonald in that photo???

Not a sentence I thought I’d read today.

Ya know…I thought you meant this photo. I thought you meant this woman had another guy inside this…tent, just plowing her. And laying on the floor also inside the was her husband, who is masturbating.

And her head is just sticking out of this thing as the rest of her family is just on the couch watching sponge bob and wondering where dad is, or why mom refuses to open her tent.

The scenario I’m saying is they either succeed, or they die. Why would they be fools for trying, if they’re going to die otherwise?

You must remember one thing. The 1% are called the 1% because we are the 99%.

So when we’re left to “figure it out for ourselfs” in a life or death situation, historically speaking the end result is revolt and revolution.

Someday, history will look back at Sanders as an evil evil man. Not because he was/is an evil man, but because his messages flies in the face of what billionaires want. So when they falsely write how evil Sanders was, it will be just as false as how the south tries to paint John Brown in a villainous attire.

Still a pretty big roach.

…am I supposed to understand this?

Still not convinced. X still has huge numbers, and they’re one of the biggest cesspools on the internet.

It was always cool to avoid facebook. Yes I AM a myspace loyalist who’s still pissed 20+ years later!

I’m also still pissed napster died!

Thats like asking “How are there still so many boomers alive?”

Give it time.

Is this macrophotography? Or is that roach 3 feet long?

I mean…to be fair, I have no children, and I won’t have children.

You know…on account of how this whole world is a dumpster fire? I refuse to subject a new life to this suffering.

Winnie the Pooh?

And see…here’s the thing. If they were just gay? That’d be fine. What I take offense to is the fact that they condemn anyone not within their inner circle for being gay.

It’s like they want to paint this picture of what they want america to be. And in this picture it’s essentially the town from the andy griffith show. Except they also want a little secret gay sex. But anyone ELSE that has gay sex is to be punished! WHILE THEY DO THE EXACT SAME SHIT THEY PUNISH OTHERS FOR!!!

Like the secret is some shamable offense. It’s not though. So you took it in the ass last night from a dude. So what? As long as you’re both ok with it, then I see no issue. Yet they want to act like nobody else is allowed to do that.

Is defending pedophilia REALLY the stance you want to take?

If some rich asshole buys an island and brings all his rich asshole friends to the island, and they spend their time sexualizing mailboxes? I mean…not my thing, but I’m not angry. I’m not judging them. I’d be a bit confused, but I also wouldn’t seek answers.

And feet? Well, that can go two ways. If the feet are either fake, or attatched to a consenting adult? That’s fine. Again, not MY thing, but nobody is being hurt here. If the feet were either severed, or attatched to a non-consenting adult? Then we have a problem.

But there is no outcome I can fathom where child nudity in media is ok. Sure, not EVERYONE would sexualize it, but some WOULD sexualize it. THATS the problem.

I see no avenues where someone sexualizing a mailbox leads to rape, or worse, child rape. Because at NO POINT can a child ever consent. All child sex is child rape. So if you know 10% of your audience IS sexualizing your media, and 90% isn’t, you have to ask yourself “Is it worth it to leave this in?”

And this then turns into a case of “this is why we can’t have nice things”. The 10% ruin it for the 90%. Then you remember the thing being discussed is child nudity, realize it’s not a loss at all taking that away. It’s not a nice thing you’re losing.

So from that perspective I REALLY have to question why you’re so insistant on enabling pedophiles.

Fairly sure no boomer would know that reference.

Also fairly sure no GenZ would either.

But some people DO sexualize child nudity. Thats the problem.

the child nudity

As someone who’s never seen this show (or most other animes)…THE WHAT?? !!!