All Kagi Search users can now flag low-quality AI content (“AI slop”) in web, image, and video search results. We will verify these reports using our own signals. If a domain primarily publishes AI-generated content, we will downrank it in Kagi Search and mark it as AI slop. If a page is AI-generated but the domain is mixed (not mostly AI), we will flag the page as AI-generated but will not downrank it.

For media results, images and videos confirmed as AI-generated, they will be labelled as such and automatically downranked on the results page. Users can also choose to filter out AI-generated media entirely.

  • ORG2001@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I sincerely hope this works as advertised. People are quite sick of all the AI slop floating around …

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      It shows up for me in the UI. I imagine that it works, and if it doesn’t, it’ll be debugged.

      I think that the bigger question is whether the rate of spam website creation will outpace the rate of human flagging of them.

      Kagi’s process involves humans. I bet that the spam website stuff runs autonomously.

      • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It runs autonomously to a degree, but a lot of these sites operate via posting a wide variety of content on the same domains, after those domains have previously gained status in search engines.

        So for example, you’ll have a site like epiccoolcarnews[.]info hosting stuff like “How to get FREE GEMS in Clash of Clans” just because previously they posted an article about cars that Google thought was good so they ranked up the domain in their ranking algorithm.

        Permanently downrank the domain, and eventually they have to start with a new domain that, as is the key part here, has no prior reputation, and thus has to work to actually get ranked up in search again.

        They’re also going to be making this a public database, and have said they’ll use it to train AI-generated content detection tools that will probably be better at detecting “AI generated articles meant to appear legitimate by using common keywords and phrases”, rather than just “any text of any form that has been generated by AI” like other AI detection tools do, which would make them capable of automating the process a bit with regard to specifically search engines.

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I understand that running services costs money, and I’ve heard nothing but good things about Kagi, but it’s very difficult for me to personally justify paying for search…

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I stopped using Kagi because I felt their base tier didn’t include enough searches but if they keep adding good features like this I may go back.

  • 0ndead@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    You had me until Kagi

    EDIT: if you want to pay for a search engine, more power to you. I’d rather not pay for a service that likely has its own set of issues.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      You can either pay for a service, or that service will utilise every single aspect of it to monetise you.

      • 0ndead@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 minutes ago

        I’ll let Kagi prove itself as a viable option for a year or two before I jump on board.