So this was before he just made gurgling noises with Trump’s ball sack in his mouth like he does now.

I know. Surely there is a way to monetize these to the delight of investors. Otherwise it’s just pathetic.

Some well-intended lawyer needs to take this on pro Bono. This could be the case that defines your career!

I’ve seen maybe a little of that with my shield, but nothing too crippling. I have an apple TV on one system and a shield pro on the other. I still prefer the shield especially because it supports audio bit streaming l, has a superior remote, and for the past couple of weeks I’ve developed an ethernet issue with the Apple TV that I still haven’t fixed. I’ve had very few issues overall with the shield.

Pretty unlikely. No third party analysis of the logs? Just putting this out there as “driver says”

Very basic autonomous systems can avoid collision with a large flat stationary surface.

Why wasn’t there someone in the room to say, “Darrell, shut your fuckin mouth, I’m sick of your shit, you are a such a deep - seated fucking asshole” when he proposed the idea of using a kids game to harvest data for drone strikes? That’s really where this should have ended.

It’s a glaucoma treatment not an age elixir. I’m not sure more than 10% of comments read the extremely short article.

What is this feeling? Like Stockholm syndrome?

“Scientists injected their ER-100 drug into the eye of a patient”

Think I’ll wait for the pill for on this one.

This must be fake news because several hundred people told me there is no malware on Linux.

Where would you put them monkey genius?

I don’t think that’s true anymore with modern engines. It’s my understanding that the on / off strain is no longer a limiting factor on engine wear and that the emissions and fuel saving benefits may be mild but are real from a net efficiency standpoint. While emissions savings are probably the greatest, I’m using this primarily to save anything I can with wartime gas prices.

I haven’t seen one where this can’t be disabled as a setting. Assume you’ve checked? If not imagine someone has found a hack for this.

I read that book. It starts out great, but man it really gets terrible by the end.

I mean he would pay someone to run you down in a bus. Guy isn’t going near a bus.

Yeah, why is that? Why do they say something then cite something as a reference for that statement that sometimes actually states the exact opposite or is unrelated? Is the citation an after thought and not really directly linked to the training materials that generated the statement?

Kagi? Add a “?” if you want to invoke summary, otherwise just get search

So ads basically? You mean ads?

We don’t need AI search, we need agnostic search. We need a search that isn’t biased and doesn’t rely on SEO money. With Google failing miserably at search and flailing with Ai BS, the field is ripe. There are some competitors but i think there’s a lot of room for an even better option here.

If this is the place where we tell the U S government what they should do, then they should go fuck themselves. Sorry bunch of pathetic wankers.

And uBlock will work on Vivaldi until it is absolutely blocked in the chromium core.