• mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The problem is the workplaces don’t want that. if you’re happier and have more energy, it also makes you more uppity and harder to control. You might even find options for other work!

    If it means keeping you tired and broken, that’s worth the cost of a little productivity.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      But is that really so? i would think that a better work life balance makes the employees inclined to remain at their job instead of hopping elsewhere. Probably even at the expense of a higher salary at another place that would instead demand the grind again.

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Take a look at are little friend remote work. Almost all employees love it. Retention is thru the roof at places that offer it. More than half of workers say they’d even take a pay cut to keep it. Productivity isn’t affected in most cases (ymmv obviously). Buuuuut guess who absolutely can’t stand it? Management. They’ll go to the ends of the earth to make sure you don’t get it. Ask yourself why.

      • jonline@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You’re not accounting for the emotional needs of management. Many of them are cruel. They put value in making their workers squirm.

        We should have worker owned things instead of the petty tyranny of capitalism, but here we are.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        People, generally speaking, have an absolutely infuriating tendency to adapt to good things. They eventually look for more. The best way to prevent this, from an employer’s perspective, is to break their spirit. Learned helplessness is one of the only ways to permanently keep a free person in a bad situation.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “So we went back to five days, and now productivity is down to effectively three days, what when wrong?”

    Executives, everywhere.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Anyone else remember the scene in Schindler’s list where the Nazis make a work camp Jew show how quickly he can make a part (a hinge I think), and then look at his completed parts bin and decide to kill him because he clearly hasn’t been working that speed the entire time?

    • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The study stops when the executives get what they want.

      Which is objectively stupid as fuck, btw

    • terminatortwo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This happened to me.

      I requested four days and laid out a plan on what “success” looked like. We tried it. After six months my boss and I agreed all my metrics had improved, so he put me back in five days because “imagine how productive you’ll be now”, so I quit a couple of months after.

    • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      On my first job the boss was telling a story about one of his previous jobs, where at one point they had to redo a whole week’s worth of work in one night. They tried hard and managed to do it. So I just added: “it’s in those times one see how slow they usually work”