Street sharks was a dope show

Dick lake

Is that per ball?

Shave your nuts with a double edge razor like a real man.

This is what psychologists do. It’s like them walking around your house and asking why you’re still holding on to this

Imagine if Obama’s administration did this. The Republican would collectively and simultaneously cream themselves (ew).

Something something broken arms

Just wait until I get my package of live termites in the mail! I ordered it off of amazon while I was working from home!

I’m not going to try and defend my take; i acknowledge it’s a shitty one, and I’ll own it. My original comment was poorly worded, though, when it comes to my stance. "I’m not trying to argue that this is a good or fair way to think. I’m just trying to clarify what I meant in my original comment.

My baseline is that they’re likely guilty, not that I blindly believe they’re guilty simply for being in a court room. I’m suspicious by nature, and the fact that you’re being tried (and that they have enough evidence to bring you to court) doesn’t lend itself to me believing your innocence. This clearly conflicts with the innocent until proven guilty concept, which makes me a poor juror to select.

I also take a lot of stock in evidence - which by its nature points to someone having done a given action. Not necessarily the person on trial, however. My point is that it’s easier to prove a positive than it is to prove a negative (i.e., innocence).

So it’s more of: I think you probably did this, and I believe what I can see and measure (and those things frequently point to guilty) than you’re guilty before you even take the stand.

If they have good evidence, like CCTV photo or something putting the accused far away from the crime, obviously my stance would change. What I was trying to [poorly] get at in my first comment is my suspicious nature. That pre-disposition makes a bad juror to select. That nature may not be fair, and it’s a character flaw, certainly.

I’m of the mind that if you’re being criminally tried, your likely guilty. Not always, obviously, but that’s enough to say to get me off any jury.

Beehaw is by approval only for accounts. They’re really clear about this, but they also went through a huge defederation with a lot of big instances.

Man, I agree with your comment you left there; he needs to get over himself.

While I didn’t read his whole rant, I read a good bit of it. He does have a point, in that he’s not obliged to accommodate users, and nor are we obliged to use his client.

This is basically history repeating itself again with the Beehaw defederation. Fitting with the motifs associated with history repeating itself, the repeat is a temu knock off of the original.

In both cases it seems pretty immature, at least in approach, but structure isn’t necessarily bad and it’s a big ocean.

I like the cut of your jib

I’m on it, Line 2551.

What is this?

I gave your mother’s 🐱 the long pork that it’s been craving last nite bb

No. Stop. Novelty accounts ruined reddit.

I know you’re just memeing, but we will have officially jumped the shark when they start showing up

I don’t need help. I need a systemic revamp of our political and financial systems, and for terrible things to happen to billionaires.

The emissions acts really forced a lot of painful innovation. Engines like the Cadillac HT 4000 went to aluminum blocks, or we utterly throttled by shitty computers and carbourator tuning.

This guy gets it

It definitely had some in the doors.