• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    It’s because it’s now dead malls that are getting haunted. To know what’s worth haunting today we’ll need to wait about 30 to 50 years to see what sorts of architecture is considered spooky.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I honestly don’t understand the houses going up in my neighborhood - it’s getting gentrified and what is being built is so ugly. Who is buying these ugly ass houses for 1.5 MILLION dollars? If that was my budget I’d build something beautiful with a big porch like this picture, but all the “luxury” homes are boxes with big garages in front. I look at them on Zillow and they aren’t even pretty on the inside.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I work for a city that’s an enclave for the mega-rich and is going through hyper-gentrification. People are buying 3 million dollar houses, tearing them down, and building 15 million-dollar houses.

      It’s the 1%ers being pushed out by the .01%ers. It’s a whole different planet.

      But the contractors still suck and cut every corner they can, so it really is the same anywhere you go.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      New builds really bug me too. They’re so pricey and big, yet the developers keep putting them on postage stamp lots. Like, who wants to spend that much money on a freestanding house while being so crammed together that you might as well be sharing walls?

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        30 minutes ago

        One of my profs in grad school had a new house built like that, enormous with almost no yard around it separating it from the neighbors. I asked him why and he said his wife liked it like that because it made her feel more secure. I was like, OK so now your neighbors can easily come kill you and then just go home instead of having to flee from a gated community.

        TBF this was in Gainesville right after the Rolling murders. Reading about somebody’s head on a turntable might make you do strange things.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah that happens here because they are knocking down one house and building two. I don’t really disagree with that, honestly. But they don’t need to be that big.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What other choice do people have? My options around here are 100 year old failing cardboard houses, or overpriced stupid Zillow Grey boxes. It’s that or just abandon my family.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If you have the budget to buy the ugly box, you have the budget to buy the cardboard house, knock it down and build something you like that isn’t so enormous. We didn’t have the budget for either so are just slowly renovating and hardening the house we bought.

        My point isn’t that houses are too expensive - that is beyond question at this point. Even your cardboard box would cost too much now for most anybody. What I do not understand is rich people buying ugly prefabricated stuff in general. I would use that budget for something bespoke.

        • gibmiser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I know two people who were dead set on building a house who then gave up on it because it was too expensive. Just massively overpriced. Better to just buy an existing home

  • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Small houses can be scary, too! My living room when I moved in back in October (not a joke):

    And there’s so much more!

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You have to own the house to have it be haunted. So boomers are kinda the least generation of people to be haunted.

  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 hours ago

    We figured out how to install gas lines appropriately. Many “ghosts” were gas inhalation induced hallucinations.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      It’s like all those stories from the 1800s of clocks stopping the moment a person died. Turns out of a lot of the clocks back then would stop running if you turned them sideways, which a lot of doctors did at night to be able to read the time of death.

      • Gormadt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s amazing how much the violent crime rate went down with the removal of leaded gas.

        • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I like to read science fiction from that time and look at the things the authors, some of them actual scientists, overlooked.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We don’t build houses like that anymore because it would cost a fortune. That’s a lot of man-hours of intricate, custom woodworking right there, and that don’t come cheap.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      You used to be able to buy similar homes from a sears catalog and put it together yourself. Maybe not quite as much detail, but still a lot more than you’d find anything on the market in the last 40 years.

      Btw $753 adjusted from 1913 is only around 25k.

      • Duranie@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        For some reason the thought of mail ordering a house from Sears has always seemed a weirdly comforting, once affordable American thing to me. Living in the western Chicago suburbs, I understand that there are several still standing in this party of the country.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I actually live in one that was built in the 30s. They’re actually really well built since they used truss plates for all the framing, plus the quality of the wood from back then is night and day compared to the stuff you can get now.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        only around 25k

        For materials cost alone, mind you – not including any labor you hire out in constructing it, and not including the land to put it on.

        (And I’m guessing that 25k doesn’t include any electrical, certainly not any HVAC, and maybe not even any indoor plumbing…)

        Still, building codes and inspections aside, I think it could be a decent idea even in modern times to have mass-produced, mail-order house construction kits available. Trailer homes have kind of absorbed most of that niche, but they’re not as well insulated or as long-lasting as real houses.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          For materials cost alone, mind you – not including any labor you hire out in constructing it, and not including the land to put it on.

          These were typically put together by farming communities, kinda like a barn raising. Even if you had one of these put together for you, it’s not like labour was a huge expense back then.

          And I’m guessing that 25k doesn’t include any electrical, certainly not any HVAC, and maybe not even any indoor plumbing…)

          It’s hard to make out, but in the link I posted you can see the add one that includes things like heating, electrical, plumbing, or different roofing materials. The additions are pretty affordable as well.

          Still, building codes and inspections aside, I think it could be a decent idea even in modern times to have mass-produced, mail-order house construction kits available.

          It was a pretty lucrative business for sears until the great depression hit. Unfortunately it was their mortgage side of the operation that forced them under. It would be interesting to see how they would operate today. The quality is great, I live in one from the early 30s and the bones are still rock solid.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In a way it has. Lumber harvested today is from much younger trees made to grow fast, so they have fewer rings and each ring is wider. Compared to older lumber that was often harvested from natural growth forests which is of course unsustainable, but is stronger and more dimensionally stable than new lumber.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 minutes ago

        I’m renovating my house which was built in 1942. Even though these houses were built as temporary worker housing during the war, the 2x4s are just insane quality. Perfectly straight and not a knot to be found in them anywhere. I repurposed some of them as stairway bannisters because they’re so great.

        Unfortunately, it took me awhile to notice that they’re all 3.75" x 1.75". I knew older 2x4s were really 2" x 4" instead of the modern 3.5" x 1.5", but I never knew that there was an intermediate dimensional period like this. I kept building new walls 1/2" too high with them until I figured it out because they looked modern.

    • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s really not that bad except the paint job every 10-20 years which costs as much as a new car, but back in the day they had oil paint which didn’t peel like latex does. Still, imo, worth it to live in an historic, unique, drag queen of a home.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I suppose if you can afford a house like this you can afford a really nice new car every so often. A really nice car. Because a full scraping, sanding, and repair plus 2-3 color paint can cost over $100,000.

          • Town@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            You could start a small business just to paint and maintain your own estate.

            • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 minutes ago

              My brother legit did this to repair his old farm house that he shouldn’t have bought. Tools and supplies are tax write offs, the company always operates at a loss, but he is basically a decent carpenter and worked through college and highschool summers as one.

              Also don’t buy an ancient house unless you have the funds to build another house in it.

    • DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      As someone with an old wooden house, it’s actually not bad. They’re built so damn well that they just… stay there.

      The expensive part is if you need to do any renovations. Updating electrical, plumbing, and HVAC sucks.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I put in about 40hrs a year on scraping and painting and the total building envelope is only 160m2, and is much less detailed.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The looks you get when you tell your contractor you want plaster, not drywall.

      They had to find a guy who still knew how to do plaster walls when we redid our bathroom. He was well past retirement age.

  • glups@piefed.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Eureka, CA has a ton of houses like this. It was the west coast lumber capital for a while, making a lot of millionaires who wanted extravagant wood houses

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I wonder if older houses seem more “hauntable” simply because they were built to facilitate air flow within them. Before air conditioning, homes had to be built to allow air to naturally circulate. Thought was placed into room, door, and window layouts to encourage air flow throughout the home, windows were designed to fully open, and transom windows allowed air flow even when doors were closed.

    The point is that old homes were built to allow air flow. This means that there’s more opportunity for doors to randomly close and other things to be disturbed by the wind. Older homes also weren’t as sealed and insulated as well. They were designed assuming that some of the structure would get wet and then dry out. Older buildings were designed to undergo constant moisture cycling, while newer buildings try to seal out moisture all together. More dramatic changes in lumber moisture content means more creaks, groans, and other ghostly noises.

    Simply because of how buildings science has evolved, it’s possible that older homes just more readily produce “haunting” sounds than modern ones.