• Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    I know someone who went to see the second one, and there was a power cut part way through. He said he was relieved he didn’t have to see the rest.

    I didn’t bother seeing that one.

  • seggturkasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Nahh! Another cultural impact is, that if you are one with natur it is acceptable to put your tentacle thingies into your girl, pull out, and into an animal it goes. You can even force it into a bird and people will like you for it. I newer saw them wash it after pulling out of an animal, probably it went straight back into the girl off screen.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I was thinking about this the other day - I saw the movie and I know what a Navi is, but I can’t recall a single memorable quote or name a character. There is no memorable SNL sketch except the one masking fun of the Papyrus font. There is no fandom, there is nothing

    • restingOface@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      it pushed for better facial animations

      It genuinely pushed for a lot of technical achievements. Knowledge/skills that will be able to improve future films. Sure, the Avatar films may not be good films on their own. But they are being used to develop technologies which will make for better films from other people who actually want to make good films.

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 hours ago

    When I saw it in the theater back when it came out, it was with my extended family and I knew nothing about it. I assumed it was an Avatar: The Last Airbender movie (which I also knew almost nothing about other than the name). It was a ways into the movie before I realized that I was watching the movie and not some sort of extended preview of another one.

    The movie was fine. Great visuals, mediocre plot. It doesn’t deserve to have had much of a cultural impact.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I’ve watched both of the sequels now (on the high seas), and they were actually pretty entertaining.

      But I agree that they aren’t nearly as culturally significant as the PR would like you to believe

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Does it have a cultural impact? The franchise seems to have very few hardcore fans and hardly any casual fans. I was at a comic con this weekend and i have seen a guy dressed as a navi. That was the only cosplay i have ever seen. There is also a guy that has his car airbrushed with avatar stuff ever since the first movie came out. Other than that i don’t think i have ever even seen an avatar tshirt

  • cattywampas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The pacing of releases was whack.

    Too long between 1 and 2, not long enough between 2 and 3.

    I also heard that 2 and 3 were basically the same movie, and that they weren’t even that good.

    • Carrot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I didn’t even know there was a 3rd one, I thought everyone was talking about the second one this whole time.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I mean, 1 didn’t make me crave sequels, even if they were soon available.

      It was a fun action movie, sure. A visual spectacle. But not a world I felt invested in.

      • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I felt like it was a world where a loooot of effort was put into certain aspects and then other parts of the world were neglected. Seemed like a waste of potential. For example some of the visual effects are kinda good even today, not just cause of the fidelity but also cause it seems like one cohesive piece. Talking about cohesion, the first and second halfs of this movie are two different movies, both with the storytelling and the visual effects and i like the first half muuuch more. Feels like if the movie focused on the Na’vi more it wouldve been better. An actually interesting story about slowly fitting more and more into a different culture got turned into some generic about natives fighting back, which you can do but then use one of the thousand examples irl, dont waste such a good oppurtunity to make something special. This is why i think so few fancy, high-budget movies tell good stories, without visual effects and huge sets you actually have to tell a story worth hearing to make your movie special. This of course doesnt mean visually captivating movies cant be narratively engaging, im just saying its rare.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          That’s overcomplicating it.

          Maybe that’s the issue.

          The characters just… weren’t charismatic/engaging. I can’t name a single one. The world was intricate, and exotic, and gorgeous, and… kind of superficial?


          I think the other Avatar is a perfect contrast.

          Iroh. Zuko. Toph. Azula. Korra, Tenzin, Zaheer. To me, these character are instantly memorable because they were so distinct in purpose and culture, even extending to minor characters like Suki or Su.

          And take bending. It’s a concept as simple as a rock, but they embed it in everything, from mundane chores to personalities and cycles to martial arts scenes. They never need to explain anything about it in words or narration.

          Hence it’s be cool if the James Cameron Avatar characters where sharp, so distinct you could cut yourself on them. If their nature synergy, dependence on unobtanium or whatever was really woven into mundane life and such, to make it feel like an important system. There’s nothing wrong with another “natives fighting back” story, but I didn’t feel anything pull me into the struggle.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, I think movies could really be used to great effect in sci fi and fantasy where setting is a major character, but it’s rarely done. I understand why, it’s a more artsy thing to do, but one that demands large budgets. However I do think it’s something Avatar should have leaned more into and it’s something I really liked in the Dune movies.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Interesting.

        I’d bet it’s an example of coincidental convergence. Take the median/average of the tropes for that premise, and I can see writers coming up with a similar story.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        As someone who hasn’t watched FernGully (but should), I’m increasingly skeptical of these types of “plagiarism” comparisons between movies. Lindsay Ellis recently broke down the “Aladdin was stolen” narrative and compellingly showed “it’s complicated”, and more obviously, YMS five years ago fucking eviscerated the then-popular argument that The Lion King was a ripoff of Kimba the White Lion.

        (Edit: I’d say this especially goes for someone like James Cameron who clearly takes immense pride in his work and setting himself apart. That’s circumstantial, of course, but it seems totally out-of-character.)

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          Was Kimba also based on Hamlet or something? As far as I’m concerned that plotline is in the public domain. Or is it just using lions to tell the story that was supposedly stolen?

          Also, how could Aladdin be “stolen” when it obviously takes direct inspiration from several stories in 1001 Arabian Nights? Are people claiming that it was stolen from some other story that was inspired by the same book?

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 minutes ago
            • The accusation for Aladdin is complicated and is based on The Thief and the Cobbler.
            • On the other hand, your instincts are entirely right about The Lion King, and when I say “YMS eviscerated it”, I mean that it’s the most comically ridiculous yet superficially believable accusation of plagiarism you could possibly come up with. This is genuinely worth 147 minutes of your time, and it’s one of the funniest videos I’ve ever watched. One of the comments summarizes it best: “Damn, can’t believe kimba invented Africa, and real life just ripped them off like that.”
    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The end action sequence was just the end action sequences from the first 2 films stacked on top of each other.

      The thing is, it was still visually gorgeous, and I loved watching it in the theatre. Avatar is eye candy, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

      Oh - and I do think the idea of trees with shared root systems forming a planet-wide distributed consciousness is actually pretty awesome sci-fi.

      • cattywampas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        This is what frustrates me. The Avatar universe has the bones to have some amazing lore and world building, but really missed on execution.

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh - and I do think the idea of trees with shared root systems forming a planet-wide distributed consciousness is actually pretty awesome sci-fi.

        Spot-on.

    • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They are stellar if you like worldbuilding and pretty worlds. They are ok to good story-wise. In terms of worldbuilding, for me, they stand on the same level as the LotR movies (not the books mind you).

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    At this point, I think its most lasting cultural impact is everyone’s opinion on how little cultural impact it had.

  • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I never even saw it. From what I heard it’s basically Pocahontas in space. The main new thing was that it was the first major 3D movie, so I’m not very surprised it didn’t stick.

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It was pretty but forgettable, unless you saw it on mushrooms then it was pretty unforgettable

    • iltoroargento@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I’ve never seen it, because even as a kid, I knew James Cameron was a hack and it would be some rehashed story with new paint that he’d call the next big thing.

      Turns out it was basically Dances With Wolves with blue aliens.

      Edit: Or so I have been told.