• 4 Posts
  • 1.34K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 22nd, 2024

help-circle

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlWho?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Yeah.

    People harp on Onlyfans, but how sexualized and “softcore teasing” Insta and even TikTok are kinda creeps me out. They’re literally entry points to OF.

    I have a parent who’s blissfully off of social media, and it was interesting to see their reaction to what they’re like now.










  • Maybe theres confusing crossover?

    I’m of the opinion that Starfield, in particular, is unreasonably tolerated even though (from what I played) it’s a dreadful, archaic, boring and sluggish game. I’m of the opinion that FO76 released in a particularly bad state, and that Todd behaved in a smiley “tech bro” kind of way immediately after its release. And I will pound BGS all day over that.

    On the other hand, yeah, I’m all for devs re releasing games. It gives them visibility! BGS does it so much it’s kind of a meme, but it’s not bad.


    So, BGS deserves some skepticism. But not over Skyrim, really.







  • Maybe just maybe they will see it as a waist of money and ditch it just like Facebook’s metaverse or whatever it was.

    This is what I’m trying to tell you! The only way to do that is tell them it doesn’t work for the intended purpose: helping customers sell Amazon stuff. They don’t care about people messing around with the bot, that’s trivially discarded noise.

    Also I’m sure at this point all my conversion’s are being fed back in to train the next one.

    It is not. It is quickly classified (by a machine) and thrown out.

    If you want to fuck with the training set, get the bot to help you do something simple, then when it actually works, flag it as an error. Then cuss it out if you like. This either:

    • Pollutes the training set with a success as a “bad” response.

    • Creates a lot of work for data crunchers to look for these kind of “feedback lies.”

    And it’s probably the former.


  • Don’t tell it its wrong, leave feedback in a seperate box.

    Not in its chat, but with a feedback button.


    Let me emphasize: the LLM remembers nothing. Amazon does not care about an ‘adversarial’ response. All cussing it out possibly does is factor that into your Amazon ad profile, and not to your benefit.

    And if you tell the bot it did wrong, it does not care. It doesn’t factor into anything.

    But if you legitimately ask it to help you buy something, and it gets that wrong, and you leave dedicated feedback, that registers for Amazon. It tells them their chatbot isn’t working, but actually frustrating customers trying to use it to buy something. That’s how you tank the program.


  • You aren’t talking to AI, you’re talking to chatbots with no memory, nor ability to change their internal state; you don’t have to worry about that. Honestly its a waste of your keystrokes and brainpower, as you are shouting into a void.

    …If you want to attack it, try getting it to actually do something (like find me an item with X requirements), then give feedback that its wrong if theres a button for it. That does get registered.