if you can afford to wear a tacticool fursuit to beat people up, you can afford to pay taxes which will actually help eliminate poverty and end crime.

(i know the canonical answer is that there’s evil organisations that make public spending to help people irrelevant)

usually yes,

unless it’s one of those versions where he’s anti cop because they are all corrupt, in which case maybe.

on top of that, they straight up shoot and torture aliens with impunity, no oversight.

and given that many of those aliens become citizens, they still trample over their civil rights.

great movie, still copaganda

In 5 years, you’ll be sitting with HR and argue about how professional is to fuck your boss’s mom.

ok.

but the problem is that real therapy is expensive, and unaccessible, while AI is freely accessible, even though it’s shit.

and open ai is profiting from that.

I’m just saying the blame should be aimed at the corporations and the healthcare system, rather than someone who is desperate for help

if thats the case, that means no one was the trully living there, so it’s better to open it for someone else rather than leave it vacant.

(if the squatters really lived there instead of just crashing there for a couple nights then they would have gotten there house)

Neither is mutually exclusive, but most likely, both of those.

they need therapy, obviously they need help, and blaming them for not doing the most reasonable thing that might be unaffordable is even stupider.

blame predatory AI, openai could in a single afternoon make it so Chatgpt recomends or even helps you find a local therapist, instead of enabling this for profit.

that’s easy to say, but when someone is in a crisis, I would be wrong to judge then for talking to an AI (shitty terrible solution) instead of a therapist that can be unaffordable and also comes with a risk of then being terrible.