• samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 hours ago

    When I saw it in the theater back when it came out, it was with my extended family and I knew nothing about it. I assumed it was an Avatar: The Last Airbender movie (which I also knew almost nothing about other than the name). It was a ways into the movie before I realized that I was watching the movie and not some sort of extended preview of another one.

    The movie was fine. Great visuals, mediocre plot. It doesn’t deserve to have had much of a cultural impact.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I’ve watched both of the sequels now (on the high seas), and they were actually pretty entertaining.

      But I agree that they aren’t nearly as culturally significant as the PR would like you to believe

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Does it have a cultural impact? The franchise seems to have very few hardcore fans and hardly any casual fans. I was at a comic con this weekend and i have seen a guy dressed as a navi. That was the only cosplay i have ever seen. There is also a guy that has his car airbrushed with avatar stuff ever since the first movie came out. Other than that i don’t think i have ever even seen an avatar tshirt

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Never seemed to be marketed that way.

        I like the films - then again, I’m a sucker for big cinema and IMAX 3D, so from an eye-candy perspective, it’s glorious. Is the story anything earth-shaking? Of course not. It’s escapist fluff… but oh… how it looks.

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          I feel like saying “James Cameron made a film about nothing” is unfair. I don’t think it’s about nothing. It’s about colonialization. It’s about inter-species racism, but in like a corporate kind of way.

          And yet, it really feels like a film about nothing. I wonder why that is.

          Is it just that it has nothing interesting to say about how colonialization works? It’s been a long time since I’ve seen the film, but I do sort of remember it coming to really obvious conclusions.

          • foodandart@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 minutes ago

            I think it fell into a ton of tropes is all. Eh, it was a product of it’s time - as all films are - and I found it similar to Dances With Wolves. Banged up protaginist, left broken by his service goes to the frontier and finds a new life…

            There it is…