The creator of Nearby Glasses made the app after reading 404 Media’s coverage of how people are using Meta’s Ray-Bans smartglasses to film people without their knowledge or consent. “I consider it to be a tiny part of resistance against surveillance tech.”

more at: @[email protected]

https://tech.lgbt/@yjeanrenaud/116122129025921096

  • FunkyCheese@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Wasnt there a ton of outrage and such incl people not being allowed on planes, back when google glass was released?

    Why is it all OK now?

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      54 seconds ago

      Same reason our governments suck ass. Something unpopular tries to get passed again, and again, and again, and again, and eventually people get desensitized and worn out from trying to fight against it. That or it hits on the right time when people are distracted by something else bigger or more important.

    • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      35 minutes ago

      I remember Google Glass itself receiving a ton of outrage actually: People hated it and anyone wearing one was made fun of (“glassholes” was a popular insult at the time).

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Many years of indoctrination. When Google glass was introduced, it was just ‘a neat idea’. Now it’s a product, and therefore it’s clearly more trustworthy because someone is profiting from it. (/s)

  • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You know what sucks?

    In that AR glasses, in theory, are such an interesting technology with lots of potential, and certainly a piece of tech I would love to have and work with and on. Not to secretly record people, but to, well… augment my field of view with whatever digital tools or displays I would like. It would be so useful

    It’s honestly kinda saddening to me that it most likely will get completely ruined by our current toxic relationship to technology. A step towards our ever increasing cyberdystopia, and not towards enchanting our limited lives

    Obviously either way I don’t trust Meta, but an open-hardware device running a FOSS AR system? It would be nice…

    I still hold out hope that this somehow could be resolved, and I would love to contribute to open software for these devices. Maybe one day soon-ish I will. My expertise should be well applicable, after all

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      It would be incredibly useful in construction. Having a digital overlay telling you exactly where to put up the framing for a separating wall, or an overlay showing the correct distance between screws, or where wires and pipes are inside a wall? There are so incredibly many awesome possible uses for AR in construction.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        I always wanted to build an AR app for inside data centers. Imagine looking at a server and being able to open a terminal or desktop that you can immediately interact with on the floor. or have it display resource information like hardware utilization, temps, network throughput and configuration, etc.

        it would make a difficult job just bit more manageable.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          I really like the special tagged tape that could bring up AR tags and details about it. Organization and directions are so more useful.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Drop the cameras and microphones and replace them with a couple accelerometers and gyros. Paired with your phone’s GPS tracking, the glasses can tell where you’re looking without actually seeing anything. You can get handy features like a floating ‘turn here’ sign over your exit while driving with GPS navigation without recording anyone or anything at any time. Better battery life, too.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Tbh I don’t even mind cameras that much if they were entirely controlled by the individuals themselves. I have a much bigger issue with it when you’re streaming my facial recognition data to Evil Megacorp 2™ servers that also feed directly to the “Not Spying… Again” agency, though.

      • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        36 minutes ago

        I don’t think that would work particularly well with AR: People get sick if movement isn’t synced up properly, not having any sort of cameras or sensors at all would exacerbate that problem.

        If you are talking about a simple HUD, then that might be a lot more viable, but for AR and the tech we currently have, some sort of camera or sensor array is kind of a requirement practically speaking.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Except that one cool thing with AR is being able to have it tell what you’re looking at is. Not just positioning things in space. A lot of cool shit that could be done with AR, like real time text translation, object identification, etc needs some kind of camera, even if it just sees IR light. Lotta cool shit needs a microphone, too.

  • northernlights@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Paywalled article. Here’s the link to the app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.pocketpc.nearbyglasses

    Edit: it’s licensed under a license I never heard of. I’m curious, I don’t understand why it was needed.

    “Why draft new licenses? Until now, there has been no standardization of this kind of source code license, even though it has become increasingly common. This has resulted in confusing and overlapping licenses, which need to be analyzed one at a time. Lack of standardization has used up the time and resources of many in the software industry, as well as their lawyers. The objective of the PolyForm Project is standardization and reduction of costs for developers and users.”

    Seems like that exact XKCD about standards.

    • barryamelton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That license looks like Creative Commons Non-Comercial, which is not an open source license.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is an unpopular opinion, but using licenses to actively prevent commercial exploitation of voluntary communal labor is not a bad thing. I would even argue that allowing commercial exploitation of free, communally-maintained software is downright unethical. I don’t tolerate this pejorative “it’s not open source unless the rich and powerful can exploit it” bullshit.

        • xvapx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No, the code is available, which is not the same as open source.

        • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That’s called “source available”. FUTO basically did the same thing with their stuff after the community rightfully got angry over their use of “open source” in their docs.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Now if they can just notify you that some asshole is recording you on their cell phone instead of reading reddit. probably 0.001% of people out there stalking are using smart glasses.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Now if they can just notify you that some asshole is recording you on their cell phone instead of reading reddit.

      If you’re out in public, always assume you’re on someone’s camera. That isn’t really new either.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Hmm… I wonder if there’s any solid way to detect a camera lens being in active focus or use. This app works by parsing Bluetooth traffic, but a person locally recording on their phone wouldn’t have such a trail. Is there any reliable way to detect a camera lens reading exposed light?

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Presumably the sensor’s data lines would be detectable, but probably more like laboratory conditions.

        Perhaps a physical shutter would be a good happy medium. Put 'em on the damn cell phones, too.

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Shoot, I should 3d print one for mine. I don’t use my camera for much anyway, and better protection from impacts would be nice.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    187
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Admittedly, this is cyberpunk as fuck.

    Should not be needed… but it’s a fucking cool solution.

  • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It sucks that it seems like as time goes on the best thing my phone will be good for is alerting me to other nearby tech to avoid.

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Now you need a powerful laser pointer to ruin the glasses camera. Careful not to blind the wearer.

    • mesa@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      yep, theres a few apps like that nowadays. Bluetooth is VERY vulnerable. At least from my understanding.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Bluetooth is a result of corporate, Microsoft types, giving a list of requirements. It’s honestly amazing it sits on top of the 2.4GHz 802.11 standards.

    • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It’s supposed to ask for Bluetooth access at that point, did it?

      Also from the GitHub page:

      if you don’t see the scan starting, you might need to enable Foreground Service on your particular phone in the Settings menu [in the app’s settings, not the phone’s]

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It worked for me after I looked at the settings screen. I’m not sure why. If it is working, though, the debug box will fill up with a ton of text.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        None of those buttons at the top work either. Possibly because they’re behind my notifications bar.

        • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Same here.

          Go to Android Developer Settings > Display Cutout, set it to one of the other options and it should shift the app down a bit so you can access the buttons. (change it back after ofc)

          I used “waterfall cutout” but others might work depending on your phone model. Afaik no other fix is possible without the app’s code itself being modified.

    • Scrambled Eggs @lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think you need to give it a sec or hold. The button down. The same thing happened to me. But it was scanning within a min of downloading