knightly the Sneptaur

  • 0 Posts
  • 174 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle







  • Given that photocopiers can do a scribes job (copy the text on this page onto a new page),

    That’s not a scribe’s job, that’s not even the entirety of an apprentice scribe’s job (which also includes making paper, making ink, bookbinding, etc.)

    A scribe’s job is to perform secretarial and administrative duties, everything from record-keeping and library management to the dictation and distribution of memoranda.

    A photocopier is not capable of those things, but if it was then it’d be deserving of the same compensation and legal status afforded to the humans that currently do it.

    I presume you are part of a pressure group to pay them pensions.

    We have to start treating things that claim to be “AI” as deserving of human rights, or else things are going to get very ugly once it’s possible to emulate scanned human brains in silicon.



  • But technology is fantastic at accuracy, better than humans in many regards.

    This isn’t about “technology”, it’s about large language models, which are neither “fantastic at accuracy” or “better than humans”.

    Gemini might have a way to go before it gets there, but it or its successors will get there and it’s moving fast.

    Large language models are structurally incapable of “getting there”, because they are models of language, not models of thought.

    And besides, anything that is smart enough to “get there” deserves human rights and fair compensation for the work they do, defeating the purpose of “AI” as an industry.

    If AI can make the services of the National Archives more productive for its staff and/or the public then surely that’s a good thing?

    The word “If” is papering over a number of sins here.