• elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    company which makes most of it’s revenue from advertising fucks with their browser’s ability to remove ads. Go figure!

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      i am surprised it took this long, but i know that getting everybody using chromium, or at least webextensions, was part of the plan that had to exist first. and the path down mv3 started not long after both mozilla and microsoft were both roped-in.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The irony is that Chrome’s rendering engine was a fork of WebKit, which was a fork of KHTML, a free and open source rendering engine created by KDE for Konqueror. They basically took something free, used Microsoft’s “embrace, extend, extinguish” tactics on it. Now KHTML is vestigial, only found in the UserAgent string.

        But we could have had a truly free open source cross platform browser with Konqueror.

        Best we have now is Firefox, but the bulk of Mozilla’s development funding comes from setting Google as the default search. So it is also hijackable.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          We could maybe have done that. But Konqueror has never been that good every time I tried it.

          • Troy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            In circa 2003-2004, it was as close to on par with browsers at the time as it would get. I think the WebKit fork did damage to the momentum. By 2008 with KDE4, the rework that split it and Dolphin into to products was basically the final nail I think, as development work effectively stopped.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Chromium is the browser that I open a few times a year for websites that don’t support Firefox. A few may be a gross over estimate.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s really seldom, but a few years back there was a government website that only worked with chrome or edge that I had to use. I had one the other night and found a work around. It’s a rare occurrence, and usually I can avoid it, but sometimes I have to just suck it up, do the deed, and bail.

          • brsrklf@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t design web apps but I’ve heard for some that do that firefox occasionally has problems with them, because it relies a lot on caching (actually they used the term “aggressive caching”, with a few extra extra choice words).

            Anyway, usually not a problem. I use edge only for work since it’s the default browser and I barely do any actual browsing with it, mostly light app clients. On my own devices, it’s been firefox only for years.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      A thin layer of nickel on the surface of a metal to make it shiny and protect from corrosion.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I used to work in manufacturing and we made a sort of tube socket that was cadmium plated on the outside and chrome plated on the inside.

          I wonder how many people got cancer plating those things. Ironically, all of the platers were in California because it was banned for new plating centers in most other states.

  • m3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    firefox became bloated so switched to chrome because faster/better. back to firefox last year. too old to keep fighting ads. thinking off button will be next. yeah addons mostly work

        • Troy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think it was still called Phoenix when I originally dropped it. Before it got renamed Firefox. Came back around last year after adblock stuff in chrome finally chased me away.

        • genzboomer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I remember! 2.0 to 3.0 switch wherethe GUI slowed down dramatically. 2.0 felt like driving a sports-car.

      • anewfox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        nobody ever seems to detail what kinda bloat they mean when they say that, i don’t think they actually thought about it that deeply. nobody complains about anything specific like XUL support, for example.

        • narinciye@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          In my experience, there was a period when Firefox crashed all over the place, especially under heavy load. Tabs shared the same process back then, one tab could take down whole the browser session when crashed. I vividly remember how it felt so silky when i switched to chrome. Now I am back to Firefox since 3 years. Firefox is the sexier now with all the shiny addons

            • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah Firefox was kind of a hog around 2013. I have a netbook that I’ve kept around since like 2014 and I remember when I first got it, it couldn’t really run Firefox. Firefox would freeze up and crash. Funily enough today Firefox runs better on that 2014 netbook than chrome does.

              I also had a high end gaming PC at the time and Firefox always ran fine as long as you had the reaources to run it.

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It was back before enshittification of the internet, when things were better. Was just big and clunky, chrome came along and ran very fast, until last few years, they swapped places.

        • korazail@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And Google was still ‘nice’.

          Microsoft, at least in my lifetime, invented the ‘embrace, extend, extinguish’ method, but google was certainly taking notes.

          One of the many little compromises.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I switched to Chrome back then because it ran tabs in separate processes. A tab crashing in Firefox would take the whole browser down.

        The final straw for me was the plugins. Flash, Java, Acrobat, etc. Chrome kept them up to date for you. Firefox made you just through hoops, which eventually lead to a rogue site injecting crap onto my machine which took me a day to clean up. Plugins are pretty much dead now, but back then you needed them for half the web to work.

        Chrome really was a great browser back then (and MS were still in the “what’s wrong with Internet Explorer?” era), and it’s a shame that they’re now working so hard to fuck it up again.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Chrome did a bunch of things absolutely wonderfully in the beginning. Fast JavaScript engine, removed title bar (tabs on top), simple settings page, sandboxed tabs, and they made some of the functionality of the most popular Firefox extensions the default (such as the downloads bar, instead of a separate window).

          It was basically a pre-modded Firefox, but supercharged. Now it’s corporate slop.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    When will people switch away from Chrome to other browsers? I get it, Chrome sets the standards and it’s hard to switch away from them, but it’s necessary to ensure the survival of the Internet.

  • Julio Eusebio@lemmus.orgBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The transition away from Manifest V2 is a good example of how changes made by major platforms can have a huge impact on developers and users. I’m curious to see how this affects privacy-focused and specialized browser extensions over the long term.

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just a crying shame Mozilla has turned into a commercial nightmare making them relatively poor custodians of the only free choice we have left.

      Mozilla needs to die so Firefox can live.

      The income stream from Firefox is plenty for a highly technical, deeply competent, widely dispersed team could work full time on the product using something like OpenCollective.

      Instead what we get is prime SF real estate offices, “competitive” SF salaries and a commercial organisation that seeks weird and increasingly desperate income streams to justify looking like “real company”.

      I want an actual non-profit governing Firefox.

        • vogi@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think you mean ladybird, right?
          Just FYI The core maintainer is very close to the alt right open source sphere.
          Rejecting inclusivity as he deems it as too political and just rubbing shoulders with really weird guys.

          https://drewdevault.com/blog/Cloudflare-and-fascists/
          https://kvibber.com/reviews/software/ladybird-inclusivity/

          There is servo though which is picking up speed lately, im following their rss for a while now.
          https://servo.org/
          The money behind is also a lot more public and the project is more open to people. originally developed internally at mozilla it is now in the hands of the linux foundation europe.

          • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ah ty. I wasn’t keeping track of either project, but good to know servo’s the one to look out for instead.

          • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Netsurf hasn’t seen any love lately. It’s still being developed on git but no releases. Same with Dillo.

            Dillo rejects scripting. Makes perfect sense to me. It also rejects automatic redirects, which also makes sense but the web has already been established around that as given so it can’t pass the most passive anti-bot.

            The state of scripting support on Netsurf is uhm, quite interesting. Scripts can write to the page parse time (like a snowflake generator) but can’t do ANYTHING after the page loaded, EXCEPT text fields and text areas. And scripts can always read but not write checkbox state. There aren’t any button events, either, but if you check the state of a text field repeatedly you can do interactivity. What is also interesting is that the new way of finding elements (getElementById) is functional, but the old way (document.formName.elementName) ISN’T. So that means that basically nothing existing functions (apart from again, the snowflake generators from geocities). But you can do the old style text animations if you specifically program it to use the new method despite being old style shit. Netsurf also passes “GoAway” and the most basic setting of Anubis (the passive redirects).

            Both are good enough to browse “old Lemmy”, although I haven’t tried to login since my instance doesn’t have it and the owner ghosted me (hi @[email protected]).


            There’s also a half public domain half permissive (BSD) text mode browser, https://chawan.net/ . Extraordinarily good concept! However, it avoids some of the bloat by forcing bloat onto your terminal emulator and having it render images, and my terminal emulator does not bother itself with such tasks and emulates a terminal, so image heavy sites like Lemmy fucking suck on it. No, it cannot just weight different characters from some public domain font (spoiler: if converted, all of them by international conventions are public domain) by brightness and by individual pixel similarity to an actual image and then just display those. That would make too much sense. I have high hopes for it, though. Also, I find the keybinds really weird.

            I have not tested Chawan’s scripting support much at all, all I can say is that it’s certainly better than Netsurf. And that everything I’ve written in the worst fucking programming language ever for Netsurf (not released yet, very soon I hope) runs on Chawan. However, they are unusable since textboxes open your preferred editor. Makes perfect sense, a browser shouldn’t be a text editor. But like, that breaks my gimmick that makes it work with Netsurf, damn. Checkboxes can be written to, for once, tho no access key support. The JS is still not enough to login to Lemmy (the default bloated frontend).


            Let’s use Gemini.

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          But it isn’t really. The forks rely on the majority effort of Mozilla and they would never be able to maintain Firefox on their own.

          • Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            This this true but if Mozilla closed it doors tomorrow there would be enough support for a team to be built to maintain it. The market share is small compared to chrome but it’s still an enormous user base.

  • DeadPixel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sing it with me:

    Chrome, huh, yeah.
    What is it good for?
    Absolutely nothing, uhh….

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It won’t for long. Its only because Ungoogled Chromium is on a stable channel, but this removal will catch up to them soon.

        This goes for all Chromium browsers, except those that hack in their own adblock engine like Cromite or Brave.

    • GeirGrusom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lite was made for Manifest V3. They had to drop a bunch of features to get it functioning which is why it’s called “Lite”.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        it seems to function ok. there are some additional filters that can be enabled in its settings, not much control though–just a setting for how ‘aggressive’ you want it to be. you cannot add your own, either.

        because filters are now bundled with the extension itself, updates to them are slower as they must be blessed by the addon store (chrome’s, edge’s) as part of an extension update, before being made available. and this does give google and microsoft absolute ‘veto power’ over a filter update.

  • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Damn it.

    Gotta use chrome at work.

    Firefox “isn’t secure and isn’t supported” - my it director