• 🌎 👨‍🚀 🔫 👩‍🚀 @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    Brave Origin’s main feature isn’t what it adds but what it removes: it scraps email aliases, Leo AI, the VPN tool, the Brave Wallet implementation, and Speedreader, just to name a few features. You can either download a browser with all of those disabled, or you can upgrade your Brave browser with a panel that lets you tweak what ones you want to keep.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I feel like if you’re writing the sentence “an optional, paid version of our browser that offers Brave […] without its extra features,” you need to sit back and take a long, hard look at yourself.

    • kepix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      won so much uninstall when it showed a world cup advert to everyones face the other day. the forks are great, but the fox is getting enshitificated in every possible way.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I also use a fork on most systems, but I still use Firefox pretty often, and I can think of a lot more ways it could be worse and isn’t being enshittified.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          On the mobile app, when you open it there’s a non-removable FIFA widget in the home page. I hate it.

          Edit: I’ve tried again and now they added an option to remove it. But still, why would I want a fucking soccer widget in my browser?

          • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah it’s doing that to me too. The ‘Countdown to the world cup’ thing? Fuck the world cup, fuck these ads, I’m only still using Firefox because I can’t be bothered to migrate all my bookmarks to something better.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The bad news is, if you’re not on Team Tux, you’re going to have to pay $60 for Brave Origin. Granted, you only need to buy it once, and you’ll get unlimited activations across all of your devices.

    It’s amazing people still believe this BS.

    • Liana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They’ll probably hold to it for that exact product. If they rebrand it and add it back, that’s no longer the same thing you paid for ;)

      • dbtng@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Ya, that’s the really obvious take. That’s teh way you do biz these days.
        Like, that’s what’s gonna happen to all those ‘lifetime’ Plex accounts. Sure, you still have access to ‘Plex-classic’. But you don’t get any of the new Plextastic services … unless you want to pay the $1,999 upgrade fee …

        • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If I get to use the exact product I paid for a lifetime account for forever that does kinda sound like exactly what I paid for.

          • dbtng@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Trust me. You need Plextastic. Its got all the cool new stuff. Just a small fee.
            You will come around.

    • dbtng@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Totally off topic, but I drink at a bar called Spaghetti Western!
      Hillsboro, OR.

  • Imhereforfun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You don’t need to pay anything if you go to the settings and disable them one by one. Brave is the best browser out there and only browser I have used since 2019.

  • dbtng@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    So much venom. That’s weird. Because they are all useful to some degree or another.

    I use Brave. (The free one. Obviously.)

    And I use Vivaldi. And Firefox. And Waterfox.
    And even Chrome.

    I do a lot of work through browser-based utilities. I like to set one browser up with all my server clusters pinned. This is the Brave/Vivaldi role. It doesn’t go online, just server mangement.
    And I’ll set up Chrome with all my work sites. Because that’s the standard, and its gonna run all that work shit reliably. Login to my work google here.
    And I want a dirty actual-browser with uBlock, SuperStop, and kill-sticky. Usually Firefox. Might get my personal gmail here.
    If I’m on a machine where I need an additional role, or perhaps some extension that I don’t want in my main browser, I install another browser to handle it.
    They are tools, folks. Use em. Don’t let them use you. Don’t be a tool.
    :]

  • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    223
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yet people keep recommending products by this scummy company and pile on Firefox for slightest missteps.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      109
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Mozilla should be scrutinized, even if Firefox is currently the best option.

      I think the only thing keeping them inline is loud community backlash everytime they make one of those misssteps.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        People dont seem to be scrutinizing though. Its genuinely unhinged and often completely misinformed. They will jump on a single line of a legal text and use it to springboard into a world of scenarios even when Mozilla is saying its not true.

        It doesnt help improve the product it just makes people think all products are bad and fallback to whatever the comfortable majority is which is chrome.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Sometimes corporations lie.

          It’s not being unhinged to say you don’t like something. And the way that Mozilla is embracing “AI” is not welcomed.

        • FluorideMind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Who cares it’s a corporation, it doesn’t have feelings. Anything to keep these corpos in line.

      • zewm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Sorry man, but the minute Firefox added that keylogger, I dipped.

        Firefox rendering engine is dogshit and they are massively behind.

        This coming from someone that was using Netscape and Mozilla and Firefox since its release.

        • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Firefox doesn’t include a keylogger. It does have the infamous privacy preserving attribution but this can easily be disabled in settings.

          In contrast, Chrome is literally a tool for Google to gain as much personal information as possible for Googles advertisement platform. It has the worst privacy features of the three major browsers and cannot be fully made private due to crippled extension support.

          Firefox engine has some catching up to do, but the Safari rendering engine is behind Firefox on features.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I find LibreWolf to be the better option for privacy, I never have an issue with rendering.

        • Liana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You either die a Netscape Navigator, or you live long enough to become a… any of em, really.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Alternatives being even worse doesn’t make firefox good, or invalidate any objective criticism against it.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They removed the paw, they are worse than Chrome! I’m going to use an alternative version that cannot exist without the main project to teach them a lesson!

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      10 hours ago

      All of the current browsers have major drawbacks. Brave has many features that other browsers don’t offer. They’ve made what is quickly becoming the industry standard adblocker, being adopted by Firefox, Waterfox, Comet, and even Ladybird browser. No extensions required.

      Most browsers don’t allow you to easily toggle on and off certain privacy features on a per-site basis. That’s why I use it primarily.

      Origin is free on Linux.

      Until Servo and Ladybird are ready, this strikes the best balance for privacy and usabllity, in my opinion

      • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m curious how their adblocker blocks more than 100% of all ads, cuz that’s what they’d need to beat ublock (which existed before brave did).

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Brave has many features that other browsers don’t offer

        Such as? Crypto nonsense?

        The adblocker? OK I guess, except they are still just a middle man for ads (hence the crypto nonsense).

        I dont see the value.

  • kibblebits@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Brave has always been a joke. And Brave users will always be a joke. And anyone who’s ever simped for Brave will always be a moron.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Rude. But not inaccurate. Brave pretends to be better than Chrome and Google, but also Mozilla and Firefox at the same time, though Firefox has always done it better and has never contributed to the chromium monopoly. Greed over diversification of the Web and competition between browser engines to effect real change. The least Brave could do is make their own engine.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Eh, I use it for watching youtube.

      For some reason (likely youtube fighting my adblockers) I get tons of errors and issues with youtube on firefox. But Brave works alright, and also blocks the ads. So it’s my dedicated youtube browser.

      • Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        never had issues with firefox and ublock origin and youtube and whatever and neither on android, linux, windows or whatsoever. guess i am just not dumb enough

        • dbtng@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Gotta refresh em sometimes. When ublock stops managing youtube perfectly, I reload all the filters. Sometimes I don’t even need to close out the browser, just the filters.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Reminds me of a joke:

    My dad always warned us about Septic Tank Steve, and that we should never pay him to do anything, and we should have listened. One day Steve came by and said if we gave him a nickel, he’d swim around in the septic tank. We thought that was hilarious, so we gave him a nickel, and he swam around the tank a while. Then he came and sat next to us on the porch and said “If you want me to leave, gimme $100.”

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Can we agree that Brave:

    • Is scummy.

    • Has a shady ceo, and a shady history.

    • Is possibly a security risk.

    • Is still orders of magnitude better than using Google Chrome.

    And that:

    • This headline is both true and clickbait-ish.

    • You can turn these things off in Brave’s settings, for free.

    • That doesn’t make this feature not scummy.

    Basically no one should be using Brave, but no one should be using Google Chrome either, yet here we are.

    And the revolving door of “best unabandoned Chromium fork to use” (Helium for the moment, or Ungoogled Chromium if you don’t mind some broken features, just to name two), is buried under so much SEO that it’s legitimately difficult to research.

    So… I’m not gonna go out of my way to flame Brave users. If they’re trying to do better than Chrome, good! Not-Google is good. They can pay for this I guess. I’m not installing Brave, though, I’m not recommending it, and this certainly isn’t making me want to.

      • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Vivaldi concerns me a little, because I keep catching them trying to replace web addresses for major retailers with what appear to be affiliate links. For example, if I start typing the address for Amazon (I know, shitty company, but it’s the first page that comes to mind) it will pop up an auto complete to click on. If I click it, I can see that I’m redirected to Amazon through what appears to be either an affiliate or a tracking link. However, if I type the address fully in the browser and don’t use auto complete it takes me straight to Amazon, no redirecting or strange links popping up first. They do not disclose that they are doing this anywhere that I have found and I think it’s shady as fuck. I don’t have any extensions installed and it happens on multiple devices (phone, laptop, PC) and only on Vivaldi, so it’s definitely the browser and not an untrustworthy extension or a compromised device.

          • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Ooh, thank you. I get they need to make money, but I hate this. It also won’t seem to turn off for me, I disabled the setting for direct match, deleted all my cookies and such, deleted the browser cache, and it’s still popping up and still redirecting through the affiliate link. Boo.

            • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 minutes ago

              Hmmm, that’s weird, I didn’t even realize this feature existed until I read your post. Guess I have always had it disabled, and I’ve never run into the issue. Have you also deleted the default bookmarks? The address bar will prefer bookmarks when you start typing an address, so if you don’t delete the default ones that come with Vivaldi, they might be autocompleting?

          • benny@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            This seems to be disabled for me on mobile, but enabled on the desktop. Seems like a helpful feature, though they could’ve just done something like Firefox where it’s an offline search for a website with the same starting letters.

            Still, appreciate the writeup and trying to minimize data collection while calling a 3rd party service in the browser and the option to disable it.

        • terabyterex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          that might be the search engine you are using. that doesnt happen to me. i use amazon every day

          • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’ve been able to replicate with DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Ecosia. Interestingly enough while testing it out to see if that was the issue I’ve noticed that it isn’t happening every time, more like every other time. It redirects so fast it’s easy to miss, but I was able to screen record and grab a screenshot of the link it’s redirecting through. It’s the same regardless of search engine.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Yeah. Or SRWare Iron, IIRC. Or DuckDuckGo or Orion on mobile. Cromite. Firefox, Zen, whatever.

        There are tons of good options, certainly more than I know. But it’s a hard thing for the average person to research, especially when forks get abandoned or whatever.