Microsoft’s AI CEO, Mustafa Suleyman, has shared his opinion after recent pushback from users online that are becoming frustrated with Copilot and AI on Windows. In a post on X, Suleyman says he’s mind blown by the fact that people are unimpressed with the ability to talk fluently with an AI computer.

His post comes after Windows president Pavan Davuluri was recently met with major backlash from users online for posting about Windows evolving into an agentic OS. His post was so negatively received that he was forced to turn off replies, though Davuluri did later respond to reassure customers that the company was aware of the feedback.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    why not just admit you overspent on datacenters, which you cant afford and trying to recoup some of the losses from your other products.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It is interesting to see his reaction to reality. He finds out that people think he’s peddling bullshit, and instead of asking why they think that, he dismisses them as irrational… That’s one way to run a company, but only if your company has a monopoly and customers can’t run away even if they want to.

    • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      His comparison to snake on his Nokia is actually good because in its current state AI is like a little gimmick for many users. Sure there are use cases but it can’t reliably perform any truly critical tasks because it makes terrible mistakes.

      Imagine Nokia shoving snake in customers faces as it is being done with AI. Every phone marketed as OPTIMIZED FOR SNAKE. A big snake button on the phone as a shortcut to open it. Snake integrated everywhere. Trying to send a text? Would you like to play a round of snake first?

      That’s what AI currently feels like.

      • mad_djinn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        have you heard of THE WORM i have installed THE WORM on everything you own THE WORM is great it can do POETRY and ART for you and also EMAILS are you happy about THE WORM ? THE WORM is monitoring your reaction to THE WORM at all times

  • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    And once again, Ed Zitron is proven right about the Business Idiots running everything. Jesus fuck these MBAbros are so fucking stupid.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Pro tip: when your customers don’t like your product, it’s not their fault. It’s yours, and the appropriate response is not complaining or incredulity that people don’t like it. The appropriate response is to change the product or scrap it completely.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “The customer is always right” might get misused a lot, but it is correct in this instance.

      If a lot of your customers don’t like something, it’s not something wrong with the customers.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        One of the older variations of the expression is, “The customer is always right in matters of taste.” Here we’re talking about reactions to reality, so it doesn’t quite apply directly, but still, these people are probably honest about what they feel.

  • rollerbang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I always wonder if these areas the people’s legit feelings or is this “just for the sake of the show”.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    Any mind which can be blown by the lack of acceptance of pseudo-deterministic slop should be constrained to stewarding products used by only true believers.

    Slopvangelical LLM thumpers are welcome chew on their shit all they like, just stop forcing the rest of us to partake.

  • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If you think you need to blame the people for not being impressed by your product, the problem isn’t with the people.

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I can’t recall ever liking almost every single comment in a post before, what a fucking rush.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 hours ago

    people are unimpressed with the ability to talk fluently with an AI computer.

    I already communicate fluently with my computer. I double click an icon to communicate to my computer “open this”. I type into a search field to communicate “find this string”.

    At no point do I want to communicate to my computer “log everything I do, then use those logs to give me something that isn’t what I’m asking for.”

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Of course they will never define “fluent”. They can’t do that because then they’d be proven as lying hacks, or else setting a low bar that was met several years ago.

    • Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I already communicate fluently with my computer. I double click an icon to communicate to my computer “open this”.

      Wish I could upvote this twice.

      At no point do I want to communicate to my computer “log everything I do, then use those logs to give me something that isn’t what I’m asking for.”

      Won’t stop them from trying to shove it down our throats.