

Well, if some rando on the internet has Done Their Research then that’s good enough for me! I am convinced!


Well, if some rando on the internet has Done Their Research then that’s good enough for me! I am convinced!


It is already conclusive they are a monopoly. If you can provide proof they are not then I will entertain you.
That is the opposite to how this works. I can’t just say “It is already conclusive that you are a prostitute. If you can provide proof that your are not I will entertain you.”


“Courts look at the firm’s market share, but typically do not find monopoly power if the firm (or a group of firms acting in concert) has less than 50 percent of the sales of a particular product or service within a certain geographic area. Some courts have required much higher percentages.”
That also doesn’t say anything over 50% is considered a monopoly. It just states it won’t even be considered one if it’s less than 50%.


Steam meets the definition of a monopoly which is above 50% market share.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monopoly
I see “exclusive” in the definition, I don’t see “50% + 1”.
Not to mention being sued as a monopoly in several lawsuits
I could sue you for running a monopoly. I won’t be successful because it isn’t true, but I could still bring it to a court. Charges being filled doesn’t mean they are true. That’s why this is a court case and not a judgment.
Do you believe drivers that create dangerous situations on the road should have the licenses revoked?


Gabe has a monopoly.
Had me in the first half, lost me here. Offering a decent service while everyone else shoots themselves in the face does not make it a monopoly.
Both people can be at fault.
Data
data
different name.
?
The examine pic needs to fit on their back tailgate.
Two things can be true: the ambulance coverage should be better and you aren’t the traffic police, you don’t know their situation, move the fuck over.
Guess which one you have more control over.
So? I don’t want to be the one they crash into.
acting courteously
Getting in the way of aggressive drivers, thereby increasing the likelihood that if there is an accident it will involve you, is courteous?


For what reason would one “have to” use Google?


Not in the slightest, no. PP doesn’t have any liberal policies (he doesn’t have any policies), Mark Carney is all conservatives policies from 20 years ago before they leaders decided to go off the deep end. Mark Carney worked for the Harper government.
Again, why do you think so many Conservative MPs have crossed the floor to join the New Conservative party?


The most fucked up thing is that SWAT teams keep falling for it. What fucking information did they have that warranted this level of a response? How the fuck is someone not fired every time this happens?


Mark Carney is 3 Conservatives in a trench coat.
Now, he is an actual Conservative, which is a hell of a lot better than a reactionary extremist that are calling themselves Conservative these days, but there’s a reason Conservative MPs have crossed the floor to join his party.


The party that all the Conservative MPs are joining, because it aligns with their conservative policies more than the extremists party they are currently in.


The lawsuit argues Pizza Hut breached its franchise agreement by mandating continued use of the software while failing to exercise “reasonable business judgment” or modify the system to accommodate Chaac’s reliance on DoorDash drivers.
To me that sounds like Chaac’s reliance on DoorDash drivers is not the norm.
A Moment of Sunshine for the Spotless Mind
I hate when people ask others to look it up for them.