• Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Find me in my living room, reading aloud SQL injection attacks and AI jailbreak promps like the newsreader from Rome

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Samsung is the second Electronics maker I’ve started boycotted, after Sony.

    Sony was all the way back since the Rootkit scandal, Samsung was about a decade ago when a small tablet I bough from them have filled with unremovable applications and after a few updates became pretty much unusable because it’s didn’t have enough memory (clearly planned obscolecence).

    Patting myself on back (and a little gloating) aside, Samsung has been clearly abusive towards their customers for a while (it was maybe the second electronics make to enshittify, after Sony) and this is not at all surprising.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Samsung has been abusive format least a decade

      Sony has been abusive for at least two

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      People should have been imprisoned over the Sony rootkit scandal.

      For those who don’t know - their music CDs had malware built in that automatically installed itself on PCs without prompting or notification that gave unsecured root access to any PC through a hidden service that couldn’t be detected or disabled from within Windows. It was as bad as bad gets. There was no hidden EULA or anything. They just straight-up installed viruses on millions of PCs that opened the door for other malware to install itself at the root level where it couldn’t be detected.

      Sony should have been shut down entirely over it.

      • Nonstop Nut November@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Wow. Yeah, fuck Sony. Seems they’ve always been in a race to the bottom. Now their insistance on a digital-only future makes so much more sense. They want to control any and all access to their products and don’t want them changing hands IRL.

  • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I was considering buying a Samsung OLED, but crossing that brand off my list.

    I just need a TV I can hook my PS5 up to and, once I set it up, an old desktop that I’ll use for SmartTube and Emby.

    That’s it.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Look AI code gets a ton of hate. And rightfully so. But you can use a coding agent to basically completely take control of hardware you own. It takes minutes.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Could you go into more detail for those of us who don’t want to brick their tv? I think you’re over estimating some of our knowledge base.

        • SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          So bascially use adb to debloat and configure a custom launcher apk? But instead of manual installation, agent using MCP?

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Oh cool, I’m sending that to my programmer wife to let her try if she’s interested when the Samsung TV version is out. I’m an engineer and thus not allowed to mess with the programming of anything shared.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Was watching gamers nexus. Opened up codex. Gave it network permissions. It was able to fully take control of the TV in minutes. It even navigated to the admin panel and gave me the code to plug in. Very quickly had figured out some of the major API’s. In a half hour, I was able to get a container/ program set up to just “send” any stream I wanted to the TV without having to use any Samsung services. Then, scramble/ poison telemetry data/ advertising data. Whatever you like. None of it is worth publishing. But I wanted to control the TV I bought. The one I own. In my house. That I paid for. And I think its royally fucked up the world we live in that there are any barriers to that.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Just don’t use OpenAI or Anthropic cloud models for reverse engineering your TV’s APIs. This guy got banned from OpenAI for doing this research on his Samsung TV, and there are reports of Anthropic models starting to refuse reverse engineering tasks, having been given new guidance. Apparently proles learning about the corporate surveillance they’re under is a step too far.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              You made the same exact statement yesterday and got buried in downvotes. Man, this fucking place sometimes…

            • Town@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              I assume all your interactions with AI are being analyzed continuously and they will keep getting more restrictive about what you can use it for.

            • belochka@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              They are saying that if you are using a cloud model, you are advertising it by default.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                There is a mile of difference in that and blasting it on Twitter.

                It’s how you get them working in blocking our ability to use these these for a legitimate and useful purpose of taking back control of our own devices.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          So, this all sounds completely plausible, but at the same time it also sounds totally crazy right! I mean that anyone could do that without actually knowing a lot about the specific system being compromised… Nuts.

          I guess I’m just curious, how much experience do you have with writing software, reverse engineering or hacking? Because I just can’t wrap my head around how a layman could accomplish this. The possibility of being able to un-enshitify the devices we purchase is really very exciting.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            I had the tv for ages and I basically never turned it on because it was so enshittified with their shit software anyways.

            I do have experience with software and reverse engineering but it’s not what you think. It’s mostly trying to reverse engineer pin outs for old scientific equipment or rat tailed sensors that come from China with no documentation. Check my post history.

            I didn’t need to do shit for the TV thing. I just finished watching the episode of GN and was like " well I’ve got a Samsung that’s basically a brick anyways because it’s so enshittifed, worst that could happen is it stays a brick.

            What I found out is I don’t need to rewrite the firmware to take control. There are basically APIs for most things.

            Just go try it.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Just open up any coding agent you like, locally hosted or otherwise, give it network permissions and the model number, and let it cook. These TV’s are basically unsecured.

        • TryingSomethingNew@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Assume I’m a newb. What kind of prompt would you give it? “ I have model x. Please find it and fix the apps on it to not record my information”?

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            My conversation literally started like:

            I have a local Samsung TV that is a good TV, but the Samsung software is absolute shit and I hate it. I dont want ads. I don't want their shit software. And I want to poison any telemetry streams they might be using to spy. I recently watched a gamers nexus video on hacking TV's. Can you look on my network and find the TV. and then do a research project to look into what it would take to de-shittify this TV?

            • belochka@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              software. And I want to poison any telemetry streams they might be using to spy. I recently watched a gamers nexus video on hacking TV’s. Can you look on my network and find the TV. and then do a research project to look into what it would take to de-shittify this TV?

              So, “local” would require a pretty powerful machine here and “cloud” might eventually stop being an option because they don’t want you to do such things using their cloud models.

              Other than that, you are starting to attain that tone of a person who thinks they are starting to understand something in depth, like a Linux convert that has learned that one can write shell scripts. Don’t. You’ve used a glorified combination of Google and StackOverflow copypaste and it worked.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                I litterally had the TV unplugged and sitting a basically a brick because it their software was such shit.

                Worse that could happen was that it stayed bricked. I didn’t “do” anything other than express what I wanted it to do, punch in the code it told me to to give it developer access to the TV, and then finish watching Gamers nexus.

                Like I genuinely don’t care what you think about this. I bought the 120 gb strix halo machine specifically for hosting local LLMs.

                You have strong opinions. That’s fine. But they are your opinions. Not mine.

              • REDACTED@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                What even is this comment? Someone asked how, person above simply replied how it started, and now you attack him because…?

              • ChaosMonkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Well, if you’re being pedantic: prompt doesn’t seem to fit as it refers to the “user” turn, and not the thread resulting of the back and forth communication between the “user” and “assistant”.

                • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Prompt is the generally accepted terminology in the relevant professional field

                • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  I’m not policing

                  I’m trying to help you not look like one of those dumbasses who thinks their computer is sentient

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Well the malevolent people I’m concerned about are the ones who sold me a TV I can’t control and who stole the Internet to make you rent our collective knowledge we built together.

    • Routhinator@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Westinghouse and Magnavox TV brands both exist with dumb TV options, Max 32" though

      The Westinghouse is unfortunately on Amazon, but I found the Magnavox at Canadian Tire for $200

  • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    This is why I have a Sony TV, it doesn’t listen to me of that I can garuntee. This is a shitpost, the TV is from 98 and weighs like 70 pounds.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I have a tv that I can easily connect to my linux laptop but which can’t connect to internet on its own. So it basically acts as a big computer screen. This way I atleast need to manage just one exit point.

    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      These TVs don’t incorporate enough power to do any kind of serious LLM. The “AI” they’re referring to here is likely an embedded speech-to-text engine. And that probably is pretty necessary for this–it would take too much data to send actual recordings to Samsung, but text transcripts are tiny and easier to search and index. It’s easy to forget, but reliable speech-to-text has been around less than 20 years, and the tiny ones that can run on embedded chips are even newer.

      • iocase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Stm32 has made micro controllers with neural processors for years now and you don’t need LLMs to do a lot of useful stuff for a spyware company. A small model can run even in really constrained hardware if you train it specifically for it. Afaik the STM32 ones are for machine vision processing on limited hardware where power is a concern. I’m sure you can do a lot more with a TV with constant power.

        • monotremata@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          That’s exactly the distinction I was making. The person I was replying to said “Imagine believing that they need “AI” to record us.” I was clarifying that this isn’t the AI we hear so much about that requires huge datacenters; it’s the kind of simple, embedded, “edge” AI that you can do with whatever microcontroller you have lying around.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        If you choose to hack your own TV, you can just stream this mp3 to servers:

        First send this:

        Then stream this:

        On repeat

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      They’re using a classifier to capture metadata (like “does a dog live there?” or “does a baby live there”) by categorizing sounds. That’s all technically legal, that’s why they do it that way.