

Thats what monopolies all do eventually


Thats what monopolies all do eventually


Don’t do that
I get the point, but that will instantly destroy someone’s life and land you justifiably in jail for a very long time


If you have a job in a school that has the word “officer” in it, you’re already doing school wrong


Australia’s peak regulator of medical practitioners, AHPRA, said clinicians must always check all output from an AI scribe for accuracy to ensure they meet their professional obligations.
Show me one single AI user that checks the output of their AI, and I will show you my unicorn


Which is fraud. Again. Not that anything will happen about that
Paid messages like these, trying to sway public opinion with ads paid for by companies, should be a criminal offense but instead we’re “meh” about it.


(Semi) covert was of using AI, especially like this, should be regarded as a criminal offense ending in jail time


I just found out yhat you can’t trust Microsoft because they’re evil fucks! Pass the word!
I’ve been doing that for the past 35 years already.


As a former Scotsman, those people aren’t Scotsmen


Relatively tiny amounts that can be stored safely
Its still better than the output of coal which ironically enough output more radioactivity than nuclear powerplants
That is so nice while going down, and such a horror when having to go back up
A staircase like that is a PITA, not an addition to a home


No no, school shooters are a “whatever”, anti flock protesters are terrorists
See the difference?


Are you really asking that?


AI agents are non sentient computer programs owned by owners
The owners are responsible
Open AI is responsible, for example. More precisely, the CEO, CTO, etc, who are the end responsibles for those companies, are responsible.
They aren’t held responsible, but fuck yeah, they are responsible and they should be tried and thrown in prison for their actions


Or can’t afford yo duplicate in this economy


Or, and hear me out, ban these glasses with the exception of some very specific use cases, like for blind people where I see a legit use case.


She should have slapped those glasses off his face. Legally speaking it should be fine to punch anyone wearing pervert glasses in the face.
That can’t be trump, not fat enough, not orange enough, not vile enough
I read “privacy fears” which would make sense but since this is about big media companies, of course it’s piracy fears.
Fuck privacy, who govrs a fuck about that?