• humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        deal is already done. UAE/KSA love USA too much to have backed down. Stock value of Skydance has been dropping hard, though.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      During the last bank bailout by the Obama administration? Vote establishment Democrat in midterms, they surely wouldn’t do the same thing.

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            A US citizen from Washington State doesn’t know what a primary is? Are you the stupid one? Also, what makes me a tankie? The fact that I don’t believe in kidnapping and beating people to fight on behalf of Zionist-controlled countries?

            • 13igtyme@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              Read what was typed. Understand what “wanna be” means. Reflect of your “Same sides” comments.

              Then politely fuck off.

  • joey_builds@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    The part nobody prices in is the stranded-asset scenario. These underwritings assume a demand curve that keeps rising for a decade. If inference efficiency improves the way training efficiency did — and there’s real pressure in that direction now — a lot of this capacity gets repriced hard.

    The bank behavior is the tell: debt that gets packaged and sold on right after underwriting is the classic ‘we have concerns but we’re not holding the bag’ move.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I would say there are definite advances for inference. Custom backends built by AI for specific models, such as Strata, makes efficient leveraging of hardware much easier. Engrams, such as those in Qwen Next-Flash, allows for using more parameters via SSD, rather than memory alone.

      These and other things over the past few years have allowed me to use bigger models, faster. Given another year of such progress, I think the value of subscribing to big American companies would start drying up.

      • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Sorry, ignorant question from someone who didn’t understand much of your comment - do you mean that AI models are writing code that improves them? Cos that would be interesting.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Not improvements to the AI themselves, but rather the software that runs them. Backends like Unsloth are typically generalists - they are compatible with all sorts of hardware, but in exchange, they don’t incorporate the latest improvements or ideas. Projects run by pure human implementation tend to require a lot of oversight to ensure that additions don’t break functionality.

          AI is really good at collecting and aggregating information. This makes them ideal for creating tailor-made products that have a narrow focus, since they raid many Githubs and papers, then attempt to make them into a product. Strata is one such backend, which is specially designed for Qwen Next-Flash.

          Strata runs much faster than Unsloth and other generalist backends, but lacks flexibility in what it is suited for.


          At least, that is my admittedly basic understanding of the situation…

  • DjangoFett@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    I can’t wait for PC parts to be super cheap. I saw somewhere that, bubble-pop-notwithstanding, NVME production is projected to hit a level within a year or so that will outpace even the last year’s demand for storage and could even drive prices for storage down to below what they were prior to the bubble. Oh, and that’s even accounting for inflation. So when the bubble does pop, we are going to have an absolute storage glut.

    The fact that the rest of the world is going to be miserable and impossible is another matter entirely, but at least I’ll have my hobby.

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      The problem with solid-state is there is a write max out. I’ve had one drive do it, and luckily, I was smart enough to run RAID-1.

      • DjangoFett@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        And old spin drives have a limited lifespan as well thanks to wear and tear on mechanical parts. Whichever tech you prefer has its own unique drawbacks.

        RAID and backups are the only surefire way to protect any amount of your data long term.

      • bantering@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Okay maybe, and I would love that, but are we going to have the capacity to take advantage of it or will we be busy worrying about rent and food?

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Someone said recently to check and make sure wherever we hold our pension funds aren’t using them to invest in the bubble.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            Yep, that is indeed a fantastic idea. I don’t have a pension myself, just a 401k and some IRAs, but I’ve diversified most of my investments away from “AI” bullshit, as well as largely away from US things in general, because the US is absolutely going to be the nexus of the coming shitstorm. Amusingly, this has also helped me to more or less beat inflation with my investment accounts, which is a nice perk.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        The AI bubble bursting will have a huge effect on the US economy though, so who knows if people will even have the money to afford it. The whole economy is being propped up by AI at the moment.

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      SanDisk has been through a tech bubble before, and that’s why they fixed their prices to provide data centers with drives at 2026 prices for the next few years. That is not a bet on hardware prices continuing to go up.

  • likebudda@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    My youtube algorthim is filled with AI-skeptics (Eli the Computer guy, Ed Zitron, Prof G Markets) so this has been the slowest car crash I’ve ever gotten to watch happen. If Donald had actually focused on inflation all of these debt-sensitive AI plays could’ve continued to whistle through the graveyard. The skeptics have called out coreweave as being potentially the first domino to topple and their 6 year debt is trading at 15% right now. Thanks to plummeting token costs, they need to double their token sales every 90 days.

    • redballooon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Stop using YouTube. The algorithm is not good for your mental health, nor to learn anything of substance.

      • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        The algorithm is dog ass. YouTube is still full of plenty smart people with something to say, though. It’s a video sharing platform; that doesn’t inherently mean every content creator who uses it is also dog ass.

        • redballooon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Each one of the content creators ais subject to the same forces that the algorithm creates. No matter where you start, the content plus the algorithm slowly pushes you as well as the content creators into one direction. It may be a weak force, but it’s always there. content creators who want to grow their views do not have the liberty to evade it.

          The direction is always towards divisive positions and decreasingly evidence based arguments, generally anti institutional, anti science, anti journalistic media.

          YouTube as a feed is poison for a healthy mindset.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I don’t use the algorithm

        I would love it if people just did the bare basics and posted to multiple sites but they refuse to.

        I mean, maybe they do with shorts + Tiktok or some of that shit

        • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          I wish the same things, but, post to YT -500k views-paycheck. Post to Obscure Streaming Service- Only fans see it/care.

          I love Nebula, but I always make sure my favorite creators get clicks on both platforms, because I’m unsure of the pay model.

          Please correct my ignorance.

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I watch more perfect union and the good liars. They’re not good at pointing out major issues? They bring receipts.

        • KeithD@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Ignore pretty much anything farming related from More Perfect Union - they tend to provide farm lobby propaganda without actually fact checking it. I’ve become much more sceptical of their other coverage based on how bad that segment of it seems to be.

        • redballooon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I have never heard of these channels. But if they are on YouTube to generate money, then they must grow views, and thus they’re subject to the algorithm. And thus you are getting your information filtered through the algorithms preferences.

          It’s not censorship, but it’s a constant force that pushes content creators into one direction, and if you’re somewhat informed I don’t need to line out what direction that is. It’s just another algorithm based anti social media.

            • redballooon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              28 days ago

              Quite a low standard you have there, and it shows that you are not prepared to defend your mind against the algorithm.

              The alt right influencer network has a huge gray zone, and the algorithm presents you those influencers that match your current level of world view. And there they sow doubt, little “insights” at a time, constantly dragging your perception into one direction.

              Trumps time is mostly over, the main alt right influencers already prepare for the time after.

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      My youtube algorithm

      Why are you deliberately living in a bubble that shows you what you want to hear? Like I have a cousin convinced for years that either the US or China is >6 months from total economic collapse, because that’s their algo is showing them reinforcing narratives they want to hear.

      • likebudda@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Using youtube logged out gives you the general algorithm filled with crap I would never consider watching, at least mine’s curated. It gave me a little too much hope in Kamala but it’s not like I fought any less hard for her. I aggressively cull my feed and it’s pretty much just the creators I subscribe to. If I want “discovery” I filter reddit by youtu.be or youtube.com.

        • Godric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          I like browsing anonymously, navigating directly to channels I enjoy because I get the general crap that can be easilly ignored at a glance, rather than potentially fringe products of an echo chamber slowly and sneakily creeping into my feed without my realization. I’m paranoid of the slow boil, you know? Different strokes.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    It’s about time for the ultra-wealthy to create another 2007 so they can wrench the last bits of wealth off anyone who isn’t already a $100Ms-billionaire.

  • DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    I have an idea: they could package all the AI debt into securities and then sell it off in small pieces to individual investors. By spreading out the investment over many different loans, the risk of default will be greatly reduced. It’s not like ALL the AI companies are going to default all at once, right? Ha ha.

  • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Can’t wait for the austerity measures Congress will say are necessary to bailout banks and “AI” “SI” companies. Because regardless of which party wins in November they will get bailed out and everyone else will get bent over.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      You’ll get a one time $1,200 check and 5 years of your employer using it as an excuse to not give you a raise while they rake in record profits.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Banks are in the business of underwriting debt and reselling it to private investors.

    We’ve been reading this “End is Near” shit since COVID. Put something more on the table.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I’ve been reading, “the end is near,” since HIV/Aids, y2k, 9/11, the SARS outbreak, the anthrax scare, the swine flu/h1n1 and the several ebola outbreaks. Oh yeah all those wmd scares and the potential for a world War after 9/11.

      The end is always fuckin’ near. If it’s all gonna end fuckin’ do it already!!! That’s what I think and it’s the waiting and the probabilities of the what-ifs that I can’t fucking take.

      Seriously, if they wanted to end it all they could, they just make threats to control everything with fear because all governments are terrorist fucking babys that ironically, need to maintain a society.

        • BonesawIsReady@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Do you think they can maintain that for another 5 years? Another 20? Is the product AI companies providing worth the valuations?

          Are 5 AI companies providing more value than every other tech company in the last 50 years? Thats what the valuations are trying to say. Im still waiting on ChatGPT to cure cancer.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            Do you think they can maintain that for another 5 years? Another 20?

            I think expecting NVIDIA to fail inside the next five years is a wild reach. You might expect Oracle to take haircut in the next five years, based on their atrocious debt load. But even then, the idea that they’ll miss a credit payment?

            Twenty years out, these firms are an even safer bet. Long term demand for compute and hosting services is only going up. And they’re so heavily consolidated. Too Big To Fail in every sense of the word. Are you going to bet against JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs on the eve of the financial crisis, even? Twenty years later, how are they doing?

            Are 5 AI companies providing more value than every other tech company in the last 50 years?

            It’s not a question of value, it’s a question of earnings growth. Will these top 5 AI companies be seeing stratospheric earnings growth in the next ten years? All signs point to “Yes”. The race to cement these data center footprints is a scramble for limited resources. The Capex budgets won’t be inflated to this degree forever.

            Dismissing them for their rapid expansion would be like betting against New York and Chicago real estate markets because you didn’t trust skyscrapers to be profitable in another 20 years. Or betting against U.S. Steel and Standard Oil at the apex of WW2, because the resource demand from the conflict can’t go on forever.

            • BonesawIsReady@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              I’m not saying they will fail I’m saying they will not maintain their rate of growth. Very, very different things but i guess you can pretend i said something else and argue against that or whatever idk dude lol

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                29 days ago

                I’m not saying they will fail I’m saying they will not maintain their rate of growth.

                They’ll hit a saturation point eventually, sure. But demand for capacity continues to outstrip supply.

                • BreakingBigfoot@lemmus.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  I think demand is coming only from a small group of people, though; it’s definitely not the rest of the S&P 500, since they’re going bankrupt from it! lol

                • gian @lemmy.grys.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  If you will hit a saturation point, at some point the demand will stop outstripping the supply. Once you cannot exapand, the supply will catch up simply because the demand decreases, not considering that the supply could simply increase.

            • BreakingBigfoot@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              28 days ago

              AI is just the NFT version of the GFR, again, in 2026 and much worse. No one will be hype farming it after this crash. All the larping “AI bro” channels will go. Influencers sitting on the beach with their laptops, shilling how it makes them $100,000 a month while they sleep. Those people will go… What I suspect will remain of the industry is a completely niche sector for specialised applications in schools, hospitals, higher education, and film & sound design; it can reduce some of the burden at work if implemented well. But most of the public will remain staunchly opposed to a subscription-based life where AI drives every IoT device in their home or vehicle and generates sloppy, hallucinated content that doesn’t help them but harms them.

              NOTE: In a survey, over 60% of Microsoft users say they actively seek ways to bypass online account processes for local accounts and encourage others to do the same. If you can’t sell the idea of mandatory sign-in just for syncing desktops because everyone understands why a PC is exactly that “a Personal Machine”, everything is supposed to stay & run locally if it is indeed “YOUR COMPUTER”… I don’t see the big 5 generating the revenue through online subscriptions to get them out of that debt spiral; local open-source AI models and cheaper hardware are the only way I see plausible mass adoption happening.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                the NFT version of the GFR

                You’re confusing a cryptocurrency side hustle with mainstream business application suites.

                • BreakingBigfoot@lemmus.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  When it comes to stock prices and value, I see the same kind of hype marketing surrounding it, not much happening in reality… Just a whopping 80 billion loss in only 6 months? It’s just freaking insane, and CoreWeave being downgraded & losing 54% in 12 months is the sort of thing I would expect from the crypto market, not mainstream big tech companies… The only real “mainstream application” I’ve witnessed thus far is an influx of low-skill hackers pulling off things they couldn’t have done otherwise, and more fake social media accounts than ever before… some things Robots, taxis, and trucks to replace workers, and creepy unwarranted surveillance systems nobody voted on to pay for. I’m sceptical that mainstream businesses implementing these applications will be reporting enough substantial revenue growth to offset their running costs in the end. That only leaves protein folding in medicine to “cure disease”, as if that will ever happen lol!

          • BreakingBigfoot@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I don’t see it happening; Copilot was a failed proof of concept that crippled the Windows ecosystem and permanently tarnished Microslop’s reputation as the premier operating-system developer; the Linux community doesn’t openly embrace AI much at all, and gamers couldn’t care less about it… All the LLM services have been running at a consistent loss/debt, and CoreWeave is propped up by the only 2 companies that couldn’t even successfully launch a finished product. They need to cut their losses and pack it in; call it a day!

            • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              TBF windows has been going steadily downhill since XP, but yeah, the copilot shit certainly made a whole lot of people start looking for the exit. I think a bunch of people had been getting increasingly sick of the windows experience for years but kept using it because it was just there, and they couldn’t be bothered to change. Actually, I was one of them. Copilot was just the final straw.

            • Jiral@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              Yes, if you invested in the right company you made a lot of money, if you invested in the wrong company, you lose all your money. The onvestment was high risk back then it is high risk now.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                28 days ago

                Yes, if you invested in the right company you made a lot of money, if you invested in the wrong company, you lose all your money.

                That’s how investing works.

                The onvestment was high risk back then

                I would be curious to see how you try and calculate EV on a stock.

                • Jiral@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  The risk back then was high. It is high now as well, if you invest in a sector that is deeply unprofitable and profitability predictions are based on a lot of speculation, ridden with circular financing, lots of obvious oversupply signs and contrary to most previous bubbles, a product (GPUs) that is depreciating so fast that no lasting value will be created by the bubble.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              I’d argue that Microsoft really didn’t do anything .com-ish. Amazon would have been a better choice for your argument.

              And noone’s arguing that no companies flourished during those years. Just that a fuckton of them drug the market back to hell with their overpriced evaluations. (people laying fiber and buying 1.2M sock puppet ads in the super bowl)

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                29 days ago

                I’d argue that Microsoft really didn’t do anything .com-ish.

                They’ve been the pack leader in the tech sector for decades.

                And noone’s arguing that no companies flourished during those years.

                The MAG7 have been outperforming the rest of the market since COVID, often by 5+%

                This is very different than betting on some small cap IPOs

                • rumba@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  They’ve been the pack leader in the tech sector for decades.

                  So what did they do that was crazy long bad bet .com? Them existing in the .com days leaves nothing to the discussion at hand.

                  Amazon was at least standing up storefronts and cloud at that point.

                  The MAG7 have been outperforming the rest of the market since COVID, often by 5+%

                  What does this have to do with Tech bubble vs AI bubble? Are you interested in being on topic or just arguing?

        • Don_alForno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Their yields going higher and higher is not “outperforming”, it’s the opposite. Higher yield = higher risk.

    • ElChinchilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Bad tech rapidly became a central pillar to that buying/selling and everyone is realizing it may be worthless.

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          One of the many lessons to take from Enron’s downfall. Downfalls like this always seem impossible until the downfall happens. Then it becomes obvious why the downfall was inevitable.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I’ve been hearing that since LLMs started gaining popularity. Doesn’t seem any closer today than, say, 2 years ago. But someone always makes this comment.

            I’ve also been expecting a general stock market crash for a decade+. Somehow still hasn’t happened.

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              Because they don’t need us. As long as they trade amongst themselves the price goes up. We can all die for all they care.

            • percent@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              Doesn’t seem any closer today than, say, 2 years ago.

              Have you seen what small, open-weight models from Chinese labs are capable of doing on consumer-grade hardware? They’re much more advanced than any flagship LLM running on VERY expensive hardware, 2 years ago.

              I have no idea how close we might (or might not) be to the bubble bursting, but surely it’s closer than 2 years ago.

              • jumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                29 days ago

                It’s fairly clear that the big ai companies are trying to get some form of general artificial intelligence because that’s basically a pot of infinite money, if they find it the rest of the economy is fucked and they skyrocket in value if they don’t find it the rest of the economy is fucked from debit and they go belly up.

                • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  It sounds like a couple of billionaires are staking their fortunes on a dice roll because the world bores them and fuck everyone else. Right?

                  Edit: I meant a couple, two three billionaires.

    • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Speaking as an ancient person that has survived 40+ years of a capitalist hellscape, Yes. The bubble always bursts.

      It is a thing that bubbles do.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        I remember the wall coming down and Denmark winning the UEFA cup in '92…

        I think the AI bubble is gonna be so much worse than dotcom or housing in 2008. To me this AI bullshit is the dotcom on steroids.

        • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          And we won’t even get infrastructure out of this. Just a bunch of half finished data centers & $500B in currently warehoused specialized GPUs that can’t easily be repurposed.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I suspect this might be worse due to the amount of money being thrown around. As much as I want the companies responsible for the stupid bubble to go bankrupt, there’s a lot of money from pension and investment funds, so that’s going to hurt a lot of people who had nothing to do with that.

      https://www.wheresyoured.at/credit-crunch/

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Apparently they’ve spent 10 trillion in commitments that soan to 2032… And have to get AI earning to 3 trillion a year to avoid a crash.

      …and there’s 8 billion people on earth. So I assume they’re hoping for some lucrative corporate/government contracts and bailouts.