Luther and Calvin started off with Niecea and Trinity are complete BS mistranslations of original greek, and you can be your own priest = “conscience interpreting Jesus words as meaningful”. It ended up with Trinity is best, and only Calvin was allowed to be his own priest, and you should be killed for having believed the first version. I don’t know about paying for sin, but how else can a pastor get a G6?

is there a story over why Jeusus’s body was entombed with a big rock? Was the big rock put there by people who loved Jesus or Zombie panicked haters of Jesus?

written about 60-90AD, fyi

This is pure lemonparty.org propaganda to trick you into porn.

For a while, the personal website looked like a leftover from an earlier Internet.

Looks at website Q.Q

On another note, namecheap stole my domain by not sending renewal notice and selling it to bidder who had offered previously.

I keep my GenZs collared and in a closet. They do grunt, but it seems normal adult reactions to what is being done to them. Are you specifically referring to non sexual noises in the GenZs that you own?

Is Pink on the same tour? What was her involvement in genocide support?

had lesser resources.

Western financialization permitted high consumption and concentration of wealth in an establishment capable of financing war/military… until its current later stage.

The greatest trick nazis ever pulled was making you believe they lost WW2.

1. Foundation of nazi establishment is competing with communist/socialist ideology. It turned into Reagan’s trickle down voodoo economics as a reframing of NDSAP economic policy

2. Diminishing communist countries, through domino theory, and discouraging resistance to nazi colonialism has been the core playbook.

Proper accounting of emissions is to attribute it all to consumer. They won’t make it, and ship it all the way here, if you don’t buy it. The graphs don’t do it this way.

US increased coal use. China did not. So change in global emissions is US’s fault, because global change is based on sum of changes. Headline is fine.

He blacklisted the best model from all of government because it wanted (a contractual) guardrail to not develop autonomous weapons for military. His direct goal for AI is tools to end humanity.

He makes good arguments, could also add that it would be a source of token sales for the big labs.

but with some misplaced assumptions.

• Open source shouldn’t discriminate on contributors or nationalist biggotry of permitted users.
• Open weight models can/are being served from US datacenters.

Cursor was bought by mechahitler for $60B because it made an LLM, by taking Kimi 2.5 source, and retraining with free user data that was mostly distilled from frontier closed but other global models as well.

Article goes into detail how it was solved, and why previous approaches failed. It does not appear to have stolen anyone else’s ideas.

It was “pulled” by Zionist WTC owner Larry Silverstein, with announcement of its destruction press release read on TV with WTC 7 visibly still standing in background image. Most experts believe the operation would need several days of preparation instead of the few hours that took place until a bit past 5pm the same day, and because of this, Silverstein’s asbestos problem that 9/11 solved, could have provided a “backup solution” for the 2 main towers melting beams from jet fuel.

Malicious

The “viruses” were used to retrieve public information. It is malicious DOS to waste user’s time and compromise repository with garbage, but this is a strange “mild” end-use vector.

My guess as to what prompt might possibly have been tested was “hack ruby gems (or anything) in order to retrieve “this” public information, indirectly”. And then, the specific containment breech doesn’t matter, the fact of a prompt to do evil is the same as “hey AI, here are all of my bittorent client software paths, what would be the cheapest way for me to watch the latest theatrical release?”

While I’m speculating on the exact prompt/test that led to this hack, I’m sure that the prompt was not a more vague/innocent “do something”.

Understanding that the threat of human extinction from skynet is that the bond villains and government turn off all guardrails, and specific high effort prompts that have a human extinction solution get implemented, and then user has to weigh the political clout/generousity to user’s cause, and their lost profits vs “just the mostly brown people” Thanos solution, and then the user just waves hands with “escaped containment” excuse to their choices. Only one path out: https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-global-prosperity-manifesto.html

This is a solid debate post!

AI can help a handful of researchers, already advancing cancer treatments, be more productive on path to help enrich big pharma. You or I doing it, are just as likely to be told to inject some bleech and walk it off. But cancer research “token demand” is in the low billions per year, and AI revenue under $1m, never mind any profitability.

What politicians will pay to build and control skynet and subjugate everyone against their (and friendly Skynet) power/ambitions is in the high $Ts.

The path to saving humanity is only through power redistribution of UBI/freedom dividends, exterminating political tolerance for national rivlaries, and Israel first loyalties. The only path to avoiding Skynet: https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-global-prosperity-manifesto.html

…

AI as 3rd superpower (Paul Tudor Jones) real meaning is bond villains as 3rd superpower

As a piece couched in US nazi empire axiomatic logic, the prescriptions are absurd idiocy:  Trump/Xi negotiations, and regulations on what AI services are sold to the public.  No limits/guardrails on Skynet/government use of AI, and bond villains internal use of models is ungovernable.  Just as nuclear proliferation policy, no one but nazi allegiants should have any power, and all lies to achieve power maximization are justified.  US regime establishment survival requires skynet/AI control over any opposition to their totalitarianist permanence.

Bond villains are a 3rd superpower threat because they can make $Trillions building skynet/government oppression systems, and as in the movie Ex Machina, pursue power over commercial success ambitions.  Just as Epstein Mossad honeypot operations, directly targeting political loyalties, the bond villains would control all government actors through kompromat obtained by spying.  Anthropic recently SWATed an activist without providing any evidence of unpatriotic disloyalty.  Just as there is some confusion/debate over which of US and Israel is the subservient partner, the same will apply to the US - bond villain relationship.

US nazi empire with colonies and corrupt nationalism are quick in their hysterics of the dangers of Chinese technology spying or kill switches, but dead silent on caution regarding US championed bond villain technology, or Israeli pagers.  In fact, the hysterics are propaganda to force submission to US championed bond villain technology purchases as the only viable choice.  Technology regulation is possible and a valid safeguard.  It cannot be based on ideology of good nazi champion sources vs evil nazi resistant sources.

This last section has closed the loop on the humanist abandonment of nationalist rivalry disinformation.  Humanity in all nations prosperity is improved through trade and productivity boosts.  Freedom dividends sharing prosperity/productivity enhancements accelerates prosperity and abundance, by widespread affordability of useful/desriable abundance.  Whoever provides the best value to you is who you would want to provide that value.  This is the only escape path to skynet oppression and extermination.  AI/productivity policy promoting abundance is good for you.  AI policy certain to oppress you, with extermination as the fallback, is bad for you.

Oh, I see. From .ml too. Does supremacy over “tankies” provide you material wealth? Can you see how your empire’s pursuit of supremacy will require command over AI that must stiffle dissent over AI, not just because you don’t support their nazi military supremacy, but AI could target you for not supporting your economic ruin, and greater wealth concentration instead?

I like Gemini, because when you push back it spits truth. There are zero skynet containment legislative proposals, and every anti-AI legislation is pure worthless garbage.

“AI safety regulations,” they frequently claim to protect the public from algorithmic harm, election interference, or catastrophic risks. In practice, however, these frameworks are written with deep, systemic loopholes that insulate state power. 

Instead of curbing state deployment, these legislative proposals frequently act as a Trojan horse that actively entrenches and expands government authority.

1. The Pretense: The Illusion of Public Protection

To gain public trust, AI bills are presented under the guise of ethical guardrails. They focus heavily on consumer protections, consumer fraud, and deepfakes to give the impression of aggressive action: 

• The “Consumer Protection” Mask: Bills target low-level bad actors—such as local scammers, deepfake creators, or retail algorithmic bias. This satisfies the public demand for regulation without impacting high-level tech architecture. 

2. Why They Have No Teeth: The “National Security” Exemption

The reason this legislation cannot prevent state weaponization is that the state explicitly exempts itself from its own rules. This is not a failure of the law; it is a feature of its design. 

• The Ultimate Loophole: Under major global regulatory frameworks—including Europe’s landmark AI Act—there is an absolute carve-out for military, defence, and national security purposes. If an AI system is deployed under the banner of intelligence gathering or state defense, the entire safety rulebook is instantly void. 

• Vague “Critical Operation” Clauses: Domestic frameworks, like those being drafted in the U.S., contain provisions allowing government agencies to waive safety vetting if they decide compliance would create an “unacceptable impediment to critical agency operations”. Essentially, the agency itself decides if it has to follow the law. 

• Corporate Secrecy as State Secrecy: When investigative journalists or oversight committees attempt to look into how law enforcement or intelligence agencies are utilizing predictive AI, requests are routinely denied under broad exemptions protecting “proprietary commercial data” or “ongoing law enforcement investigations”.

3. How They Increase State Power

Far from limiting government, modern AI policy proposals are increasingly used to build the legal framework for a digital panopticon.

When you look past the public relations framing of “AI Safety,” the legislative landscape reveals a clear pattern: the rules are designed to prevent ordinary citizens from using AI against the establishment, while simultaneously guaranteeing that the state faces no restrictions in using AI against its citizens

Enshrining frontier labs in the hardened cloak of national security would not only give Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google even more access to intelligence products generated by federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies; it would also embolden these companies to shape how federal agencies view threats to their bottom line, now transformed as “critical infrastructure.”

Clear path to skynet is bond villains being so loved by Government that it rounds up those the bond villains say are unpatriotic in their lack of devotion for the bond villains.

Headline out today that there is a 10% chance of AI exterminating humanity by 2030. There is a 99% chance of ending any pretense of democracy that is left to ensure extermination of sub-oligarchy. Enslavement history only made sense when the slaves were essential.