You won’t believe what he looked like after smoking only one marijuana.
Who wore it best?
Sean is always cool, but I wonder how Thomas would look had he been smoking a pack a day for 20 years too.
Is this really it? I thought the non smoking would be compensated by the increased pollution of everything
There’s significantly less air and water pollution now than the past, with the only exception being microplastics. We haven’t found many short-term impacts from that yet, though
I was thinking of PFAS, pesticides, ultra-processed food and such
Considering back then they had asbestos, lead, etc, we’re still a lot better off now, I think. A lot of our stuff now is “this increases risk” whreas a lot of stuff then was “this causes literal organ failure”.
Connery also grew in the wake of WW2, that kind of stress ages you early
Air pollution was worse in the last century https://ourworldindata.org/outdoor-air-pollution
Thanks for the informative response. I’m a bit confused by the graphs given, that track emissions and not air quality itself. Would you know why?
AQI is highly variable by locale and hour. It averages out in the end, but measuring regional and global emissions is a better way to compare disparate time periods, except for areas at the extremes.
I would expect emissions to cumulatively impact air quality, is that not the case?
To begin, it does accumulate in the region where it is created, but of course it diffuses over time, so 10 pollution could be 7 locally and 3 globally. The heavy elements (soot) never get very far and naturally fall out of the air. Some elements are broken down by sunlight. Some bind to rain and are washed into the ground. If pollution is constant, you reach an equilibrium in the air quality. Decreasing output slowly lowers that equilibrium and improves the air quality in the end.
Thanks, that’s very informative!
Pollution was probably another contributing factor; I’d be surprised if it wasn’t a lot worse in the 60s than it is now: a lot of environmental controls got put in place in the intervening decades. Remember, there was leaded gasoline everywhere, and acid rain scares and the ozone layer depletion in the 80s.
Oh ya, because removing lead from the air made it so much worse. /s
I’m sure sun exposure also plays a role, everyone wears SPF 8000 sunblock now, while they were putting on tanning oil back in the 50s, 60s, and 70s
I’ll buy that for a dollar!
Calm down, Captain Kirk
Really? I thought sunblock was pretty over the top in Connery’s day.
now that’s a golden tan!
It’s a combination of many factors over time. Diet, sun exposure, smoking. Lots of things we have more information about now than we did then. Medicine is better, genetics, etc.
Pollution was worse back then, look up smog in the 70s. We’ve introduced catalytic converters, emissions standards, etc. Most people now question why we need clean air laws because we have clean air, much like people thinking we don’t need vaccines because those diseases aren’t around.
Which is funny because those diseases are still around since they flare up when people stop taking vaccines.
But tell people that millennials look younger than previous generations and people lose their shit.
Part of it, I’m sure, is that Thomas has babyface. Part of it, too, is that people don’t smoke cigarettes, or drink as much as they used to, or generally live as hard of lives. Living through the 2000s, for example, isn’t really as complicated perhaps, or troubling, as living through the Great Depression and World War II and the Cold War.
Neat, not a shitpost.
yeah not even a speck of visible feces like wth‽!
I’m so deeply offended by this post not meeting my exacting criteria for what a shit post is. How could OP not have consulted me? Me! The arbiter of all that is true and good on the Internet. Shame on your house, OP! You will be Blood Eagled by a team of dachshund ninjas for this transgression!
No need to get offended about it bud, they just posted to the wrong comm is all!
Some people used to be born old. That’s just how the world worked. Also, stupid fashion. Have you seen a photo of a woman college student in the 80s? They look 40.
Thank me later
https://www.urlw.com/tvkmYS
Nah just drugs/drinking/smoking. He has admitted he started smoking at 9
Those huge glasses that were in vogue in the 80’s did no one any favors.
It’s funny that culturally 34 was considered a middle aged man back then whereas 34 today feels like an old 20 something.
You made my entire week and added spring in my step, I just hope it won’t ruin my knees.
Removed by mod
My back’s been at leat some level of thrown out for the last 15 years.
What knees? Your bones are gone, dumb vegoon. They evaporated the moment you stopped consuming animals.
-Signed a dog meat lover
I love that website, exactly my style!
Address not found
It loads for me on multiple browsers, on multiple VPN locations.
Is there literally just no preview link for you? Or does it fail in the browser?
Hahaha wtf is this‽
Something to hopefully make people think about cognitive dissonance and consider how they could change.
Ah I had not scrolled far enough. Now it makes sense. And I’m hungry now. Anyone got dog?
Re: the other comment, isn’t it weird how people just come up to you on the internet, and say, “hey, I’m an asshole, block me!” That’s weird.
If you are refering to the dog meat lover, it’s actually a vegan satire site!
Oh! Welp
And the 20 y/o’s feel like babies. I see dudes get weird with the younger nursing assistants sometimes and get a tiny reflexive EXCUSE YOU…???
“Autism face” is a thing that makes you look way younger than you should. I know I’ve got it. It’s weird being carded at 37.
Yesterday three collegues called me “young blood”… I’m 35.
These pictures are due to two things; genetics and lighting. Even though dude on right looks younger generally, if he was photographed in the same light as Connery they would look much closer in age.
You can see the shadow on the wall behind him. There is a light below his eyeline. That’s called a beauty light, and it hides wrinkles by lighting the areas that would be in shadow from lights above.
But smoking also has a lot to do with it.
Thank me later
https://www.urlw.com/tvkmYS
Smoking, alcohol, no sunscreen will still age up a person of today by 10 years.
I think also one of them probably had an easier path:
Sean Connery’s father was Joseph Connery, a factory worker and lorry driver.
Thomas Brodie-Sangster was the actor and performer, Mark Sangster.
Thank me later
https://www.urlw.com/tvkmYS
Reference error: no reference to Thomas Brodie-Sangster found
Thank me later
https://www.urlw.com/tvkmYS
He was the kid in Love Actually who learned the drums. I think he also reprised the role in Red Nose Day Actually.
More recently he was the dude in The Queens Gambit. I forget if he was a love interest or an antagonist but he was in it.
I forget if he was a love interest or an antagonist but he was in it.
Several men were both iirc.
Yeah. That was a surprisingly good show.
Thomas is like a genetically engineered femboy for Hollywood billionaires.
No need to go out and molest nubile young boys in the Caribbean, this bad boy is of legal age and doesn’t look a day past 15.
Like a human version of a toy dog, but with a genetically superior busy.
Wow they look like two completely different people
But, you can only tell that because one used sunscreen, and one didn’t. Otherwise they’d look exactly identical. /s
What if James Bond did a pdrn mask every time he was supposed to drink and smoke and every time he was supposed have a villain try to torture him he got HIFU instead?
Crazy how nature do that.
They’re different people? I thought that was just angle and lighting.
That’s what smoking and sun exposure can do to a person. Smoking especially ages you fast.
