• SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          You could just wrap your phone in tinfoil, but there is an exact way that you have to do it. If you have ever been somewhere remote without signal, your phone will nuke it’s battery trying to find signal by increasing the antenna’s power. You have to put it in airplane mode to save your battery. Not matter what you do, even turning your phone off, the antenna will be live sending some signal. The takeaway is that even with a hacky Faraday cage, your phone will try it’s hardest to phone home and could win with a tiny tear in the foil.

          • shartgargle@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            Honestly just easier to leave it at home. Or in your vehicle, assuming you didn’t pass by the camera on your way, and leave it sufficiently far enough away. I doubt they can read RFID from cards yet, even at a close enough distance to cut the pole down, but might want to leave those at home as well.

              • shartgargle@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                21 days ago

                They’ve become so attached that they get anxious without them.

                “Oh man, I gotta park far away so it doesn’t read my plates and info from the car… Well I’ve gotta bring my Galaxy watch so it counts all the extra steps I’ll be taking.”

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Are there good ways to kill a flock camera from a distance?

    Could aiming a laser at the lense damage the ccd in the camera?

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      One-watt 532nm green laser or a .22LR bullet. The bullet is probably safer.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        That’s fair. Yeah some Halloween costumes are all well and good, but for the rest of the year, it would be great if there’s a way to destroy these cameras without getting caught on camera yourself.

        The thought behind the laser idea was just that it might not draw a lot of attention.

        If anyone has better ideas, please do share them. My goal is to come up with less risky ways of dismantling them than getting right up there with a ladder. The .22 might be the simplest solution so far.

        • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Seems like a mask and no electronics on you would be a far better solution here. Perhaps even a fancy mask celebrating the great Spooky Season holiday.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I really, really hope people don’t go out en masse and destroy every single Flock camera that is unconstitutionally filming and profiling them, because it would be a terrible crime to do so. Definitely do not do this people.

    • Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Not American. What is flock? Is this like a ring doorbell? Are people suggesting to destroy personal property of their neighbours?

      Or is this like some government cameras that are in public spaces filming ?

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Or is this like some government cameras that are in public spaces filming ?

        It’s a nationwide network of cameras used by federal, state, and local governments to track and profile people in public. It doesn’t just record, but builds a database of information on every car, license plate, and person that’s filmed, so it’s seen to be very dystopian.

        Even worse, the tech gets it wrong and mistaken identity is common, and it ends up endangering people due to the violent methods US police employ. However, it’s privacy concerns that are foremost, because there’s an amendment in our country’s Constitution that should prohibit this kind of privacy violation.

        If you’d like to learn more, I made a YT video on the topic recently.

        • Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Wild stuff. That is far worse than I thought was going on.

          What a scary timeline and I hope the country and sort out this stuff and reform this type activity.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            They’re not just cameras. They also log nearby mobile devices. They’ve gone from a few hundred nationwide to over 100,000 in like 2 years.

            • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 days ago

              Uber is going to start implementing the same thing, so mobile Flock that you wouldn’t be able to take down.

              • njordomir@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                21 days ago

                Someone could deploy devices that clone signals they hear and replay them at random to poison all the data. But they definitely should not do that.