~$|>>> Onlyfans! <<<|$~

Except that’s not how that works - creating a healthy used resale market drives demand for the Pixel phones. I may not be giving them my money directly, but it’s still of huge monetary benefit to Google if I purchase one of their phones used. I like grapheneOS, I really do, but it’s inseparability from Google hardware is a serious problem.

If only you didn’t have to give google money to be able to install it.

… Illegal?

Both are correct, although the use of “lighted” as in the above is becoming archaic.

I won’t let it go to my head. I promise. Probably.

Anyways tho for an actual opinion:

This thread is a bit of a mess and I would caution taking anything being said (except by me, the absolute authority) without a large grain of salt - however mostly people aren’t contradicting each other, it’s just a hugely complex topic that quickly devolves into semantic-adjacent arguments about how we should be comparing battery chemistries (on market / in lab / cross-chemistry) and what degree we should be considering the “soft factors”; things like the number of recharge cycles, robustness of the cells to damage, cost of manufacturing and/or recycling the cells, etc.

Sodium batteries are a big deal, and as far as I’ve seen we’re finally at the point where they’re starting to become market viable, but they’re still a largely unproven technology. Arguing that battery tech hasn’t improved in the last decade is obviously wrong, but it’s also not wrong to say that there hasn’t been any dramatic improvement in the technology in the last decade. None of the many “miracle battery tech” announcements that promise to have double-or-better the capacity of lithium chemistries has panned out, we’ve just been making slow gains across many chemistries and those cumulative 10% improvements to battery life year-over-year are finally starting to add up to where the average consumer can really notice them.

Start of my villain arc right here. Like unidan, but with more buttholes.

Did you mean to tag me?

(You can edit post titles on lemmy, fwiw)

In this one case EA is to blame, but I do know what you mean. I think it’s just that YouTube videos have had a large impact on the form media takes, and that’s trickled out towards other forms.

Red-dyed ones were all over the middle east when I was a kid, but I’ve never once seen them in the US sold this way. I think it just depended on what exporter importer your region mainly used.

Man, I haven’t seen this image in a decade and I can still spot it.

They upload the following meme to everyone’s printer and call it a day:

In this case there’s no evidence showing that it’s being spread widely - the bug reports are entirely about users being shown their own content. If you have something to dispute that I’m all ears.

For clarity, it’s only being summarized for the users that wrote it, it’s not leaking them to everyone. A comedically inept bug to allow though, holy shit.

“Touch some grass”, if anyone else is unfamiliar with the tla. Rather rude, since that is not even slightly clear in the original meme and I appreciated the extra information…

Yeesh no that’s what they’re after, they’re spaming this drivel everywhere to promote their youtube channel.

God, it really is.

I’m sorry, I’m not sure if you’re satirizing the initial poster or not :(

… Because they tell a compelling story?

I can have a preferred color combination (turquoise and violet) without making that color combination my entire personality. You can do the same thing with video games.

What? What does that have to do with it? They’re not engaging with once massively popular stories, not bemoaning how they can’t be obsessed with them.