• yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “would”

    Yeah they try this all the time. But holy shit these comments acting like it’s already happened, and then gone into full blown USSR mode, are a bit inflammatory.

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Meh… I don’t pirate anthing, so… non-issue from where I stand. Though I can see how this would upset a lot of people.

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The regime doesn’t need this buffoonery to ban freedom of speech. They’re already trying that shit regardless of piracy.

          • Pratai@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            What other weapon? I already said I don’t pirate anything. This is a harmless weapon to use against me.

            • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I feel like you are so dumb you would drown in the rain by staring up at the sky I literally just gave an example that would affect you.

              • Pratai@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                That you resort to ad hominem when people disagree with you shows you aren’t mature enough to discuss this in any meaningful way.

                Also- it shows that I won’t be missing anthing when I block your immature ass.

            • bravemonkey@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Great, no concern to anyone then because it doesn’t affect you personally. Why did you even reply?

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My ISP wondering why I only ever access 5 servers in Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and Finland

  • DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    All new media (other than documentaries) are meaningless. AI slop, propaganda, white washing or ego porn.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you think documentaries can’t be propaganda, I have an excellent bridge for sale

    • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It really is. The same open world games, the same sitcoms and movies, the same soulless music. None of it has any soul anymore, it’s not even actual expression or art…

  • Smaile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Sounds like they want people board and mad, a historically winning combination.

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Like this will ever work. lol. Just don’t get VPN from a company that is headquartered in the US. Problem solved. There are a million other ways to bypass this. There will ALWAYS be away, they’re just trying to make it harder for the experienced, and impossible for your average Joe.

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They could also force ISPs to ban VPN IPs that don’t comply with their piracy blocking rules, regardless of whether they’re in the US.

    • gandalfthewhite@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The only way to stop it is by severing all the cables and blowing up the infrastructure. They aren’t prepared to do that.

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Literally. This is not a new “fight”. These corrupt, bribes-ridden fuckers have been “fighting” piracy since the inception of the internet, and they’ve always lost, and always lose.

  • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This leads to the government deciding which websites you can visit and cant visit down the line. This is a dystopian level of control and with surveillance already getting dystopian… Pick your dystopian technology book and decide which one we’re leading towards. Fascism policies are already on the rise in democratic worlds.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        TIL expressVPN started as

        Crossrider started off by making a SDK for the deployment of browser extensions platforms with support for monetizing extensions. The monetization options were used by major [ad injectors which used man-in-the-browser to change or add advertisements to what users saw.

        JFC.

          • No1@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I had trouble with IVPN. They didn’t have many countries/servers, and ended up being blocked.

            Currently on ProtonVPN, and seems to be OK so far.

        • iamthetot@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Proton has been good for me. CEO seems like a dick but I’m gonna be honest it’s getting pretty hard to support any tech company that doesn’t have a dick CEO.

        • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Mullvad is zero log and located in Sweden, and accepts payment in crypto to reduce traceable privacy footprint (which frankly is one of the real, relevant use-cases for crypto to further legitimate privacy needs).

        • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Proton, mullvad, air VPN, depending on threat case. NordVPN for torrenting specifically, but not as good for privacy etc.

          The most important thing is to check who owns the VPN (as the previous commentor said, stay away from Kape tech) and where it’s based (e.g., 14 eyes), as well as independent security audits and the company’s public history with government requests.

    • aim4harmony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      NextDNS is good and I just realised that it’s based in The US. The alternative ones don’t seem to provide the feature of granular filtering.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          i think you have to set up DoH with unbound to make it not be in cleartext? I dunno honestly I’m a dummy, but I’m fairly sure that it’s pretty tricky to get it totally secured. I guess I don’t understand why you can’t use ubound recursively but have its root.hints pointing as something like quad9 instead of all the actual root authoritative dns servers, theres like 13 of them and more than half are the US government.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    political theater. won’t happen because it’s unenforceable.

    • VPNs operate outside of federal control
    • ISPs leverage DNS blocking to censor which is laughable
    • DNS exists outside of the US

    if this does happen, IF, it has nothing to do with IP rights or protecting Americans. it has everything to do with censoring what the majority of common Americans read online. this is the first step towards blocking news outlets that won’t regurgitate whitehouse directives.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago
      • ISPs leverage DNS blocking to censor

      And blocking the IP address of the site in question, as well. That’s why so many “illegal” sites jump around IP addresses like a flea on a hot griddle. They’re trying to remain accessible whenever the ISP prevents direct access.

      Because if you block the IP address, blocking DNS is superfluous and performative – it’s just window dressing for better optics towards politicians who don’t understand tech. DNS censorship trivially bypassible by using custom DNS servers that aren’t affected by the censorship, while IP blocking hits everyone who is under that ISP regardless of their DNS settings - they need a VPN to bypass IP blocking.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        all that’s going to do is give them an excuse to block IPs outside the US by the block.

        keep an eye on the FCC and any legislation they take against HAM or SDR. without that it would be difficult to have any comms outside the US.

        • rekabis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          No, IP blocking is widespread in most places, it’s just that “rights holder” lawsuits go after the domain name, first, both in terms of the registrar and DNS. They also force ISPs to block IP addresses, but this is more of a whack-a-mole prospect so it’s usually a second-order method.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m a bit surprised they’ve gone with piracy as an excuse - usually it’s “Think of the children!” Maybe they’ve finally figured out that we already know that republicans are thinking of (molesting) the children so they’ve fallen back on “You wouldn’t download a car”.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But surely the whole point of using the VPN is to use one that’s outside of U.S authority?

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not if you want low lacency.

      IMO your main concern should be about what country the VPN is based out of (and their privacy policy) more than where the servers are located. But then again I suppose it all depends on what kind of activity you’re using your VPN for.

      • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        When I was messing around with my VPN, I was looking at translated news from Germany, France and Spain and they all have more or less different data usage policies. It’s interesting but at the same time, you can just go on a news website that a country mainly uses and translate it.

        Interstingly though, when I used a VPN, it changes all the typical homepage shortcuts on Google chrome to what Germany, France and Spain uses for the main shortcuts.