Little bit of everything!

Avid Swiftie (come join us at [email protected] )

Gaming (Mass Effect, Witcher, and too much Satisfactory)

Sci-fi

I live for 90s TV sitcoms

  • 35 Posts
  • 1.11K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Agreed. I think if it’s not literally save the world they think it won’t sell, when some of the best movies I’ve seen this year have revolver mostly around personal relationships. Love, drama, tension. There are millions of stories out there that are ready for the big screen, they just don’t involve the end of the world so Hollywood doesn’t seem interested.

    Guess that’s why my money keeps going to A24 and my indie theater.


  • When full anxiety takes over it’s very hard to go outside and just live normally, I was definitely like that. I had to look up movies ahead of time to see if they were apocalyptic and if they’d be triggering. They still are a bit, but I can enjoy things again. It’s absolutely a thing that Hollywood and big media loves playing up the end of the world and playing on those anxieties.





  • Interesting, mine also came from my parents, I guess that’s more common than I thought!

    I think 2016 is when it started for me too actually, and it was probably because of the upward trajectory we were on that then became obvious that we werent, at least not how I thought it would be, and I had to learn to cope with that

    Thanks for sharing your story


  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techtomemes@lemmy.world3rd day of 2026...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Very well said. The new brings us everything bad and only weird feel good moments. I argue you can be completely informed and not watch the news. When someone tells me they’re anxious about the world, most of the time they watch the news regularly. Their business depends on you being glued to your screen, and anxiety does that well for them.


  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techtomemes@lemmy.world3rd day of 2026...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I was an anxious doomer all the time until I went to therapy. Something they said stuck with me.

    The world is not binary, it is not going to be the best case or the worst case. Out of a range of infinite outcomes, focusing on the worst case scenario doesn’t make sense as probability says it won’t happen. What will likely happen is somewhere in that area between best and worst.

    Eh they said it better, I’m having trouble remembering exactly. Point is, doomer’ing is a waste of time because it probably won’t happen.

    One that got me in the 2010’s were the “Water wars”. People told me constantly only a few more years and we’ll all be at war! I legit had panic nightmares about it. Climate change worries me, and it set off anxiety. Turns out the doomers were wrong then, and continue to be wrong. Will it happen? It might. It might not. It’s impossible to know, but focusing on the worst case scenario is a waste of time.

    It’s easy saying everything is going to hell, and to some it makes them feel better. It’s much harder to accept the weird grey area we continue to live in that’s neither good nor bad. So, if you’re like me and things like this immediately spring up a fear response, carry that with you, and focus on you the individual. Maybe this will be the year you get that promotion, or a new job, or start a new hobby, or meet the special someone.


  • My mother keeps spending 11 hours a day in Facebook and then sending me random shit from it.

    Everyone always tries to pinpoint when Facebook got terrible. I was there for it. I remember it. While it happened over time the instant it was uncool and lame was when the first parent signed up.

    The moment it was over for me was when my mother sent me a friend request.





  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techtomemes@lemmy.worldyou can just do stuff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hold on, you never said residents. If this was a neighborhood-wide push then I would be open to it. The neighborhood may have a good reason to say bus stop should be here or there, if there were many home owners asking for a change then that is something I would agree with. Maybe there’s a coffee shop a block away that more people congregate at and it would be better used there, maybe people don’t want to j-walk to catch their bus. Those are reasons that make it worth changing - for the good of the public and the neighborhood.

    However, if it was one house then as I’ve said and stand by, I view it as selfishness. I see it as one person dictating how many others can or can not go about their time on public property, and trying to dictate to the city where they can or cannot put public services on their own land. I don’t care if it was 70 feet or 700 feet, it’s one person with a minor, tiny, insignificant change. I said this elsewhere and I stand by it:

    They didn’t want to see them out their window? Deal with it. You want privacy? Close the curtains or pay to put up a fence. Someone is loud? They’re there for 20 minutes max until the next bus. Or what is most likely from the photo - they probably wanted a parking space there. I don’t see any reason to push to move it that wasn’t selfish.

    The best reason I heard is that maybe it was an issue with how loud the bus was, that one may have credence. However, pushing it closer to the neighbor doesn’t seem like a solution, and it seems like it should be a neighborhood discussion.


  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techtomemes@lemmy.worldyou can just do stuff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’ll say the noise factor is the first reason that I’ve heard could be a legitimate issue for the person living there, I appreciate that reason. If that was the case, then I would back it, but also I live ~1 block from the bus stop and I can hear the air brakes from my house through walls, so I would think they are pushing it to their neighbor’s house instead of talking about the actual problem with the city.


  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techtomemes@lemmy.worldyou can just do stuff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    because to me it’s pure NIMBY-ism. Maybe it’s because I’m a city guy, who is used to whatever going on around my home, but it’s just a weird thing from my perspective to get upset about. I personally just don’t see anything that’s worth going to city council and complain about. To me I see a bus stop which from the image below looks like it’s a very suburban street so we’re talking a few dozen people a day, max. Whatever the reasons were in my opinion were selfish. They didn’t want to see them out their window? Deal with it. You want privacy? Close the curtains. Someone is loud? They’re there for 20 minutes max until the next bus. Or what is most likely from the photo - they probably wanted a parking space there. I don’t see any reason to push to move it that wasn’t selfish.

    It’s the city’s property. It’s on the city’s sidewalk, it’s for the city bus, and street parking is public funds for private vehicles. It’s theirs to do with as they will. The homeowner has rights up to the edge of the property. The city has a duty to provide ingress and utilities to that property. To me it’s the definition of Karen-ing.

    People disagree with me. Fine, but I’m holding my ground. I call it selfish. Yeah it’s 70 feet, but it all in my mind is “The city must change their plan and their property for my convenience”





  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techtomemes@lemmy.worldyou can just do stuff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    We have no knowledge of why it was there in the first place, we’re only given one side of the story. Maybe this was closer to a crosswalk, or nextdoor was less safe. We don’t even know if the stop existed there before she moved in. We don’t know. All we know is old lady didn’t like view of people outside her window and decided that instead of dealing with it she had to change it herself.