• Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I mean the rich are building bunkers so the bottom Fallout 1 death screen is appropriate if you know the lore of the vaults/bunkers.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    If the rich end up in doomsday bunkers while the rest of us have to deal with the shit world they ruined for the rest of us, we better make it our mission to… plug any holes we find, if you know what I mean. Not suggesting violence that could get me banned or whatever, just make sure that the outside air don’t get in. Public service.

    • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Don’t worry, we were fucked since before you were born. We overshot our ecosystem long, long ago, it just takes decades for the consequences to catch up.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      You’re just in the wrong country, aligned with the wrong set of politics, speaking the wrong language.

      The future isn’t American anymore. The future is Mexican and Brazilian. The future is African. The future is Chinese.

          • GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 minutes ago

            Tell that to the vast swathes of the globe, including China, due to face lethal wet bulb temperatures within the next 10-20 years. Which, along with mass death, means massive breadbasket failures on multiple fronts. Ain’t politicking our way out of this one, chief.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              16 minutes ago

              lethal wet bulb temperatures

              Europe wants to rebalance trade with Beijing, but can’t quit Chinese air conditioners

              One country is producing all of the world’s air conditioners. I wonder if they’re in a better position to endure wet-bulb temperatures than their peers.

              Ain’t politicking our way out of this one, chief.

              They absolutely can and will. This is a country that can build the infrastructure to keep people from dying of overheating. What’s more, this is the country that can export that infrastructure globally, such that its allies will see improved survivability. And that will have cascading knock-on effects.

              The ability to survive climate change is the ability to operate as a global center of gravity.

              • GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                12 minutes ago

                I think you missed the ‘massive breadbasket failures’ part of my comment. You can’t air condition a field of rice. Well, you could, but good luck trying that on the scale needed to feed everyone once crops begin to fail globally.

          • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Kind of, I guess. Depends on if there any animals larger than a cat left after the temperature change stops and levels off.

            • marcos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              56 minutes ago

              Depends if we can adapt them quickly enough to survive.

              Brazil has been dismantling our biotech sector for 20 years now, so I’m not optimist, but YMMV.

              Anyway, I’m more optimist on avoiding problem than on dealing with it.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              56 minutes ago

              High temperatures don’t preclude large lifeforms. Just ask the dinosaurs.

              But you need the ability to adapt at speed and scale for the entire ecological colony. You can’t rely on biomes that cater exclusively to a handful of apex predators.

              • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                54 minutes ago

                The rate of change is faster than any in the planet’s history, I don’t have high hopes for many species surviving.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  37 minutes ago

                  The planet has been undergoing the 6th global extinction event in its history for over 30,000 years. During this time period, humanity has flourished even as millions of other species have died out.

      • Photonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Doubtful. Climate change as well as its economic impact will affect most of these areas especially hard

  • Lanvjscdlk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    These are all just the optimist’s dream. Following that, you could imagine “how people in the 2020’s see the future:” and then put the AI techno-optimist view of a post-work utopia where robots do our bidding.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    This is exactly what those who are broadly portrayed as visionaries want.

    Unfortunately, it never seems to have dawned on the general public that those who market themselves this way were never the visionaries.

    Take Dennis Ritchie, for example, one of the original creators of C, who died just days before Steve Jobs: The media went out of their way to emphasize what a loss humanity had suffered, while failing to acknowledge that someone had died to whom humanity owes a great deal. They celebrated only the greedy capitalist who knew how to market a technology, but not at all the rather humble man who made a tremendous contribution without enriching himself at the expense of the common good.

    That was a long time ago, but today’s world is still exactly the same - it even got way worse from there: no recognition for those who actually achieve great things, but only for those who step into the spotlight and thus appear to be the ones to whom humanity owes something.

    In my view, this encapsulates everything one needs to know about our time—the absurdity of charlatans desperately wanting to be billionaires or even trillionaires.

    This attitude has nothing to do with the real world, and it is a hubris that no halfway decent person would ever presume to have—yet humanity is ruled by exactly these megalomaniacal monsters because it collectively allows it.

    So we are ruled by the worst that humanity has to offer—by unscrupulous opportunists who live only for themselves, have no sense of community, and have set up a system of undeserved triumph in such a way that only their own despicable kind can follow them.

    It is a system that is directed against humanity itself.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      I’d love a site full of sources of the real inventors of shit I can shove into the faces of people who think fucking musk is actual iron man 🙄🙄🙄🙄 the disinformation is so strong.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        I’m afraid that’s just as hard—if not impossible—as figuring out which artists created all those iconic Disney characters. That’s just how soulless corporations are.

        I could never handle building a site like that myself because just doing the research would be so absolutely depressing.

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      On looks alone first one has car infrastructure, public infrastructure, healthy amount of artistic marketing and high quality housing.

      For current US, from descriptions I see, that’s actually utopia. xD

    • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The futuristic ones ignore the fact that all of the homeless and destitute are not present because they’ve either been enslaved, or they’re relegated to the old decrepit previous version of the city, as the Sylvester Stallone Judge Dredd showed us.

      Edit: Altered Carbon and even The Fifth Element demonstrated this too. You saw the poor living below the smog line.

  • Sergio@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Counterexamples:

    How people in the 50s saw the future: GlobalCommunistDystopia.jpg

    How people in the 80s saw the future: PostNuclearHolocaust.jpg

    How people in the 2000s saw the future: WarAgainstTerror.jpg

    How people in the 2020s see the future: [email protected]