They’re just using AI to do their job more efficiently, what’s the problem?
“If these companies want quality data, then they should offer quality contracts,” Alice continued. “Instead they’re low-balling struggling people, employing them for the barest possible amount of time and tossing them aside as projects are finished with no warning.”
Pay peanuts, get monkeys. Or minimum viable product for that price range, if you want to put it more fancy.
reams of fresh inputs.
Thank your “journalists” who “graduated high school” for their interesting take on mass nouns.
I’ve heard of people leaving perplexity because the CTO is strongly encouraging devs to use AI vibe coding and not waste their time manually reviewing the code themselves. Sounds like a shit show.
This is very important. I’m in a situation where the work I used to do is supposed to be taken over by the shitrobot. On a job platform now 15% of the job offers are the original work, 85% is AI slop fixing in one way or another. This led me on a 2-year odyssey of trying manual work (too weak), being really poor (getting better at that), and finally deciding that if I’m forced to serve the shitrobot to avoid starving I’ll serve it badly. Btw so far I’ve managed to avoid these jobs, may it remain so.
That said, if you are in need of a real human translator for tech or creative EN-DE projects do contact me, I’d be glad to keep doing work that makes sense!
I absolutely despise morons who smugly pronounce language learning and translation work “solved”, while at the same time not bothering to learn any language beside their native one. And most often not bothering to use that one well, as well. You can tell so easily they have no idea what they are missing out on.
I hope it’s all going to end in style of tower of Babel event. I know that it won’t, but hey.
Wish you the best for your field of work.
Language is in a peculiar decline these days - there’s the process of English becoming the most badly spoken and written language ever, because all of us non-natives use it online and often also at work. Together with the inescapable avalanche of slop being churned out.
Also, language used to carry authority and this is getting lost for more and more people. We have been bombarded with advertising, propaganda, lies for many generations now and it’s becoming stale. Longer texts used to carry more authority, now a topic can be communicated very precisely through a meme, and why not? For a translator I am getting awfully distrustful of words I’m afraid. I believe we are already standing right under the crumbling tower and will have to learn to communicate through shrugs and grunts. And again, why not?
language used to carry authority
That’s an interesting view, because one way I always looked at it was it became a gating function (in a negative way). Just like the rich raise the barrier to entry, I always thought that there were people who were dismissive of others because you couldn’t speak their language perfectly.
Coupled with the hundreds of unique languages (let alone dialects) it created artificial pockets and barriers of understanding and power.
I do understand some of the cultural nuances of specific languages, but overall having a single common language understood and used by everyone can help unite us globally, rather than keeping us siloed.
I absolutely despise morons who smugly pronounce language learning and translation work “solved”
Juu sammoo miäkkii uonny uatelna. Kaekkee hienoenta tämmöttiissä uonku eip nuo alakoritmit ja semmottet oekkeest uo mittee ees ratkassukkaa. Miä eilispäevänä justiinsa opinni etteep tekoviksut ossoo ees kunnolla murutehia kientöö, vaek kyl miä nii luulinni juu. Tämmöttii kup vähäsennii huastelloopi ni eip hyö siihe oekkee mittee osannukkaa virikata! Kuukkels tuo etteenki se suols aenaki iha pelekköö paskoo, ol ihap hauskoo kyl lukkoo ja naaraa.
Our company decided to build our own ai translation system because the human translators we’ve been hiring started using AI… Quality dropped immensely, trust is lost. CEOs don’t feel like shopping around. So sad.
Here’s the thing: human translators have been using ‘AI’ for over a decade. It used to be called machine translation, and for anything but the dumbest stuff it’s a dumb idea, first nail in the coffin of translation. Translation agencies loved the shite, of course, because they could now pay a translator 0.05€ per word instead of 0.10€, arguing that now the same work took less time (it did, and also a lower quality translation was produced with a lot of costly bullshit software in the middle). The translators, as is to expect, hated it, but were forced to accept it or starve. We are now very slowly reaching the point where we are hired back as esteemed professionals after AI-caused communication mishaps and business fuckups keep piling up …
Imho nothing wrong with AI use by professionals, as long as it’s verified. That obviously wasn’t the case.
Good. Poison the well, fuck this toxic industry. Burst the bubble.
oh man it had been 3.4 nanoseconds since the last ai slop post here on lemmy, thanks for posting!
The slop will continue until the bubble bursts.
the bubble won’t burst dot com style like you’re all hoping btw, it’s not a bunch of tiny companies over valued, the biggest companies invested in ai are the biggest companies in the world
they’re not about to go broke, if anything the ai bubble popping would make them return to regular super insane profitability
No one thinks companies like Google or Microsoft are going away.
What’s going to happen is that OpenAI and Anthropic will ultimately fold because they can’t be profitable, Google and Microsoft will scale back their supremely unprofitable LLM operations, Micron and NVIDIA will plunge in value because all of a sudden their bloated prices aren’t being paid by anyone, Oracle will suffer because OpenAI can’t pay its enormous bills with them, massive data center projects will end before completion, and a whole lot of smaller businesses that embraced all this madness will collapse.
That will have devastating ripple effects throughout the economy. It’s going to be a lot larger than the dotcom bubble bursting.
I do think the inflated valuations are in-fact existational threats to Microsoft and Google. Tech stocks are so over valued that they very well can go into a death spiral when investors no longer believe the company will grow exponentially. Its happened before, and will happen again. Thats why they are so desperate to hype AI. Thats the only illusion that have left to justify future growth.
I mean, the names will still be there, but you will have consolidation and buyouts and other changes of ownership. Some will continue as a shell of their former selves (like old school IBM), while others will just vaporise (Kodak). There’s not really a reliable mechanism for a companies valuation to shrink by several orders of magnitude and just cut back and continue as a stable smaller company.
Obviously, the people at the top will get government handouts to stay rich and it will be all our pensions that get cleaned out. Thats how this works. Cheer the bubble bursting, but only because the earlier the less harm for all of us. Ram won’t get cheaper either.
What’s going to happen is that OpenAI and Anthropic will ultimately fold because they can’t be profitable
OpenAI maybe because it has a consumer focus and most of their users aren’t paying, more likely they’ll restrict free use and increase pop ups to get people to sign up
Anthropic is already profitable if you take out the enormous spend they have on training, which if the bubble bursts would leave them as the number 1 ai provider, it’s also insanely in demand and has trouble keeping up with its current product, they also have several products mythos etc lined up
That will have devastating ripple effects throughout the economy
I doubt it, I think it’d be closer to liberation day tariff’s or the oil crisis, it’ll go down for a bit, many articles will be written about how this is the worst thing ever then 6 months later it’ll be back up again
As said all the major players in this game are super profitable major companies, that won’t change
Despite Lemmy doomer posting about AI every 2.8 nanoseconds it is getting better:
We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks.
https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/
The only thing that worries me is that:
Economists warn that without AI-driven investment, the U.S. may already be in a recession, raising concerns about economic dependency.
The US economy might already be in the shitter and AI is just hiding it
Removed by mod
How did they not see that coming? AI could have been a handy tool as a wingman handling small, repetitive tasks. Instead we get a giant mess that expensive and not terribly useful. To me it’s like EVs. Which would have been great second around town cars until the infrastructure could catch up.
Would have been? EVs are exactly that. They’re great. Ones with range can easily replace cars with internal combustion engines for most use-cases. Usually costs me about $5 a month to keep mine charged.
Fully agree on LLMs being expensive messes that aren’t very useful, though.
Not the above poster, but I would say the cost. Modern EVs are designed to replace cars, and so cost the same or more, while being not quite as convenient for long trips.
We could have all had lightweight, city-speed but cheap, short-range EVs for a decade or two already if that was the approach taken. The battery requirements for 60kph and maybe 100km of range are super minimal, even before you go lighter. Like an order of magnitude smaller.
Might have worked if the street infra and laws allowed it. Would have been super tough to pull off at the start, and a lot of people lack the parking for two different vehicles. I do remember some companies trying these, but there’s no where appropriate to drive them.
