Join the list any time before June 25th at 10 a.m. PT. On that date, the list will be closed and randomized, and you will receive an email with your results shortly after.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I wonder how many people there are that fall in that category but who wouldn’t just buy a much cheaper console instead though.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      An existing PC game library, better pricing and flexibility for PC games, wider and more robust controller support …

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        All true. If you already have a large library of PC games, it wouldn’t make much sense to get a console. But then you probably already have a PC as well, and can ride it out until the AI bubble pops. That’s certainly what I’m doing, as now is probably the worst time in history to buy new PC hardware.

        Of course, some may say it’s only the worst time in history for now

          • Caducous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            And those people cant afford the steam machine. I just don’t see how the steam machine isn’t DOA.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              36 minutes ago

              … There are plenty in that group that can afford a steam machine. Why is everyone acting like that 70% is living on gruel.

          • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I believe it. I’m sure there are millions of people using Steam to play Dota or CS2 on stuff like old laptops. But how many of those are willing and able to spend 1000+ for an upgrade?

            Ultimately, stock may be so low that it doesn’t really matter though.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              That means there are a shitload of potential customers, not “I wonder how many people there are that fall in that category but who wouldn’t just buy a much cheaper console instead though.”

                • someguy3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  What are you on about? There are people that will still want/need to upgrade, and those are the customers. It’s not ignoring price, that is simply the price whether it’s a PC or a steam machine. Something tells me you just want to disagree so ciao.

                  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 hour ago

                    My point is that you can’t take the price out of the equation. If your standard for “potential customer” is everyone for whom a Steam Machine would be an upgrade, that’s not a useful metric in my opinion. As many of those either can’t afford to pay that much or wouldn’t want to pay it for an upgrade they don’t necessarily need. Dota plays just fine on older systems. My initial statement was in the context of the pricing, not “I wonder if anyone would get it if it were $100”.

    • THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I have friends who only have consoles. This is who I think should be looking at this. People like me who wanted a second PC for the living room may pass on this because of the price, though. I don’t need a second PC that bad. But for my people with no PC, no monitors, no keyboards, this is pretty decent. Not to mention the it’s an alright deal when pricing out a build yourself.

      • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 minutes ago

        Except a PS5 Pro is $1100CAD and this is $1500CAD ($2000CAD if you match storage with the PS5 Pro, which is 2TB.) That is a huge jump. This is too underpowered for enthusiasts, and too expensive for console only gamers. Early indication is that it’s also underpowered vs a PS5 Pro, so I think it’s underpowered even for console gamers.

        I know why they have the price pressure they do. But I can’t say I’m not wildly disappointed. This had the potential to end the console market entirely and now it’s looking like another also ran.

        I was almost definitely going to buy this. At this price vs performance, I don’t think I’ll even put my name on the list. Much of this is out of Valve’s hands, but maybe they should have just scrapped it until pricing is better. This might be worse than nothing.

        One thing I will say is I love the form factor. If was looking to build a living room PC this would be a serious contender because the design is great. But it’s just not enough to pay $1500 for a PC that matches the spec of my $800 PS5.

    • Angryhumanoid@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Honestly that makes me like Steam even more. Any company that is willing to put up that much money to serve a niche market earns my respect. Sure they’re doing it for the simple reason of Steam machine owners being guaranteed Steam gaming customers but it’s still serving a subset of their customers like few companies do these days.

        • Angryhumanoid@fedinsfw.app
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Sure, but they’re one of the only companies proving that consumerism doesn’t mean you have to be a complete asshole of a company. They make money, people get the product they want at a price point they are satisfied with.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I mean, speaking for myself, I already bought the consoles back in 2020. I bought a Steam Deck to access non-console games.

      This does what the Steam Deck does only moreso.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          “Equivalent” consoles are much more expensive now as well. The entire playing field is fucked.

            • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              PS5 pro is $900, champ, and it’s got vendor lock-in.

              My point is that everything is more expensive. Sony jacked those prices up by hundreds of dollars already.