3·
3 days agoOnly if you don’t check when you update your deps.
Dremor
- 22 Posts
- 506 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 20th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
18·9 days agoIf you aren’t sure of a binary source trustworthiness, better not post it. Stick to what the devs officially publishes.
Did the same on my Ruby half a year ago. Fun times.
Which is why I did not delete the post and commented instead. Technically it is against the rules, but interesting nonetheless, so I’d like OP to defend his post it order to promote a conversation on said topic, instead of doing a post&run.
Thx. Sorry, too sleepy right now to watch the video, will watch later. 😅
Hi Silverchase.
This content may be a better fit for c/gaming, rather than c/games.
We try to limit meme-ish content under rule 4, not because we don’t like them, but because it tends to overwhelm other content (like game trailer does when there is a big gaming event).
Linux support ?
Mod Note : T’was a nice april fool matey !
Careful with what you wish for. Not everyone here is idiot enough to think everything is resolved with a bullet to the head.
Enjoy your 1 day ban.
Tales of Symphonia, GameCube.
I can live with helping some assholes if my contributions help others. At least I don’t make them richer since I only use local IAs.
That’s not how LLMs work either.
An LLM had no knowledge, but has the statically probability of a token to follow another token, and given an overall context it create the statically most likely text.
To calculate such probability as accurently as possible you need as much examples as possible, to determine how often word A follow word B. Thus the immense datasets required.
Luckily for us programmers, computer programs are inherently statically similar, which makes LLMs quite good at it.
Now, the programs it create aren’t perfect, but it allows to write long, boring code fast, and even explain it if you require it to. This way I’ve learned a lot of new things that I wouldn’t have unless I had the time and energy to screw around with my programs (which I wished I had, but don’t), or looked around Open Source programs source code, which would take years to an average human.Now there is the problem of the ethic use of AI, which is a whole other aspect. I use only local models, which I run on my own hardware (usually using Ollama, but I’m looking into NPU enabled alternatives).
Being a developer, I don’t care if someone else uses my code. Code is like a brick. By itself it has little value, the real value lies on how it is used.
If I find an optimal way to do something, my only wish is to make it available to as much people as possible. For those who comes after.
Probably, but I won’t touch that shit unless I have no way doing otherwise.
Edit : As an example, I got an “add or update” stored procedure that start line 5, and ends line… 226.
Yeah, you can do pagination, but you need two request : one to select everything, the second to only return the results between id x and id y. Needless to say, the performances are far from ideal.
But in recent version you do skip and take x, which is far easier to write. But my codebase date back to the 2000’s, and it uses the old ways.
As an example, an SQL request to filter on an handful of parameters, and paginate, easily amount to 40-50 lines of SQL. And that’s the easy ones, because some request uses multiple view, in which case I wouldn’t be surprised to find a request doing more than 100 lines of SQL, maybe without even factoring the view in.
I work with a client using an Oracle DB. You have to do multiple request to even do something basic as pagination 😂.
They improved it over the years, but given the choice, I’d advice for anything else than Oracle. I’d even prefer MS Sql, which, given I’m pretty anti-MS, is a miracle.
To rethink something, it would require to think first.
Sound more like you learned the hard way what “abusing the system” mean.
Your argument cannot be considered as an "reductio ad absurdum”, as it didn’t show any absurdity in your opponent arguments. Your argument could be considered as either an “argumentum ad lapidem” (dismissing a claim as absurd without demonstrating proof for its absurdity), but more realistically it is indeed a strawman, as you try exaggerate you opponent argument in order to weaken it (avoid because Israeli != avoid because of possible link to Israeli intelligence ties).
Still, you are right to doubt some of your opponent proofs. I too have my doubt on that claim, but don’t have the time right now to fact check it.
Feel free to link your own research here, if you find more reliable sources.
Removed under rule 2.
Try to not push your arguments in a offensive way next time.
Any person has the right to be acknowledged as they are, not as other want them to be.
Speaking of vocal minority, I’d add the one who tries to erase any LGBTQ+ from anywhere visible (books, games, speech). Your comment make me think you support them.