This comment was reported as homophobic.

I believe the meaning of the comment to be

Republicans projecting - again

Leaving it up for @[email protected] to clarify.

I have worked for non-profits.

They are completely allowed to make a profit.

You are mistakenly under the impression that I’m against Mozilla.

If you go back to my original comment, I merely explained what I explained here. Mozilla is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

You decided to take that as an attack on Mozilla, for some strange reason, and attacked me. I just turned that same energy back on you.

Did I ever attack Mozilla? Did you attack me?

I couldn’t agree more

I only use Firefox. I’ve only used Firefox since 2000.

They, by their own statements, are a 501( C )3, which is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

Sit down.

Non-profit isn’t the same as not-for-profit

Take American Red Cross

They make bank on blood donations. Also, they take in way more than they put out.

non-exclusive

That means we can license all our content to another company, and Reddit would be forced to allow them to fetch it, as we still own it, right?

You bitch about Chicago Pizza? Fucking CHICAGO?!?

Let me introduce you to the abomination I’m trying to eliminate: Quad Cities Pizza

They are called TOPPINGS. toppings, not middleings, for the love of all things just and right.

Seriously impressed your still doing this

Can you hit a tree with a rock while naked I’6m the programming language?

What’s wrong with Rust?

I mean, when you remove the toxicity, it’s a great single-player game.

Ignore the thousands of hours I have in the game.

No idea. That’s why I’m impressed

What impressed me was the way they faked when the message was sent. It said the message was a week old.

After reviewing the actual legal filing, you’re correct. I somehow missed that.

All persons (corporate or individual) in the United States who participated in an Affiliate Program with a United States online merchant and had affiliate attribution redirected to Paypal as a result of the Honey browser extension.

Thanks for the clarification.

The YouTubers can only sue for actual damages THEY realized.

As the class is for content creators that partnered with Honey, it can only be for the affiliate links.

Users will need to sue separately, either individually or as a different class. My money is on them having a forced arbitration clause, so direct lawsuit will most likely be out of the question.

I hope it doesn’t.

https://librivox.org/the-iliad-of-homer-by-homer/

Generally, no.

Valve just isn’t my enemy.

We have a ton of the free games. They give away a bunch to get you to use them.

Never paid for one from them, though.

If your enemy is going to help you beat them, let them.

The Shroud of Turin: the real origin