It absolutely does increase latency though. If I’ve got the option for steady frame rates without frame gen, I’ll take it over frame gen. Frame gen was just about mandatory for Borderlands 4 at launch, and it gave me a convincing 80 FPS. After a performance patch, the game can get 60 FPS on my machine for real with a few of the settings knocked down, and it feels so much better.
Most people buying a Wii were doing so for Wii Sports anyway.
At that point, it’s combining SKUs of what they consider to be the main “game”. Non-deluxe Mario Kart 8 is a rounding error. Tetris gets really weird to count.
It is a small indie game. And yes, it sold that much. Every time I see that stat, it blows my mind.
It took me about 50 YouTube videos to get me to a point where I believe I now understand what a reverse proxy is and how I should use one.
I’ve crossed that threshold in Dunning-Kruger where I see how much I don’t know, and it’s simultaneously disheartening and stressful. But hell, what am I going to do now? Quit?
I’m trying to properly learn VLANs and set them up so that I’ve got “self-hosted services exposed to the internet” and “everything else”. So far, the only thing I need to isolate is a NAS with Jellyfin and Komga, but I plan to add more services via a mini PC later. The thing that has made this whole journey frustrating is that every time I try to learn something, even laser targeted, I don’t get the full answer from the first thing I find, and the next answer I find introduces more complexity. I think what I need is a managed switch from my local Micro Center like a Netgear GS108Tv3, to replace the switch currently in my office. Then, if I understand correctly, I think I need to put the NAS (and eventually mini PC) on their own subnet and use VLAN rules to allow traffic to that subnet but not from that subnet to the rest of my LAN. But it’s hard to determine if I’ve even got that right.
Also 600W is likely several times more power draw than the Steam Machine is aiming for, however much that might matter to someone.
It’s been the play for a long time that being second or third to market is still lucrative. It’s being any later than that that’s the problem.
It got way more complicated than it was just a few months ago.
I think it would be difficult to argue that those two don’t count.
If you haven’t played Elden Ring or Baldur’s Gate 3, I’d say that you haven’t played two of the greatest games of all time. And I love me some Factorio.
The old adage is that nine women can’t make a baby in a month, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t a time and place for large team sizes. Large games employ large teams because that’s the only way they get made. I’m definitely first in line to say that lots of large games could stand to be smaller instead, but there are plenty that I like just the way they are, and they’ll need large teams. That means they’ll be expensive to make.
Yeah, that’ll happen. You can’t make Elden Ring or Baldur’s Gate 3 with that team size though.
This is also survivorship bias. Plenty of companies would love to support their game post launch and make this much money, but they go under trying to follow the same playbook; even the ones that were successful doing so before.
Not so much covered in this article, but the vast majority of the spending is in paying more developers, and executive pay, which is largely in stock, isn’t a large contributing factor. Your favorite game from 25 years ago was probably made by 30 people in 18 months, and now the equivalent level of production value today is made by somewhere between 300 and 1500 people over a longer stretch of time.
It’s broken down by scope of the project, into four main buckets, seemingly not by country.
You’re not playing 500 games per year. Realistically, you’re playing a dozen or so if you’re a real enthusiast. Focus on the ones you like, support them with your time and money, and the market makes more of them. There are so many good games coming out in a year that I can’t keep up with them; I’ve got a spreadsheet and something resembling an Agile planning methodology to get through them more efficiently, and I still don’t have a chance of playing everything that looks good. Hardly any of those have any microtransactions (I definitely don’t buy them in the ones that do), and none of them waste my time.
I mean, funny enough, I head to a pub to play board games every other week, including tonight. I was more referring to suburbia and sprawl destroying “third places”, as well as younger folks’ tendency to drink less. It’s possible that online gaming expanded our ability to choose our social circle more than simple geography used to dictate.
There’s a lot more to what destroyed hanging out in the pub than scheduling, but yes, the games themselves have a lot of value in the socializing part of the equation.
We’ve got lots of problems if autonomous cars become some sort of standard.