

I think the company could still likely chase people who do that for damages if something broke or for lost profit since it would be pretty clear that it was intentionally disabled/intended to stop its function so it would be pretty clear in a civil court that there was tortious intent.
I wouldn’t personally recommend doing it on these, they are essentially walking cameras.





I agree. their best play here would have likely been to just delay release until the hardware market stabilized. its going to flop at it’s current pricing.