pornhub usage statistics

pornhub kinda sucks btw

  • boogiebored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    When I first saw this I didn’t realize it was for PornHub and was just stoked for the year of the Linux desktop lmao

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think avenue Q said it best, “The internet is for porn”.

      Sure, PornHub is not the only thing you can do on the Internet. Some of the more formal studies are functionally run by marketing groups, who are likely more skewed to advertising demographics.

      Example: the fundamental backbone of the internet upgraded as part of the CERN Large Hadron Collider project construction, to distribute the massive amount research data being generated to scientists across the world - but Cloudflare doesn’t count that traffic when preparing it’s statistics)

      All I’m saying is: you could do a lot worse than PornHub as a research authority for trends in this subject.

    • PrincessTardigrade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      My Chromebook self-destructed a couple years ago and nearly burned our house down. That thing also was the shortest lived computer I’ve ever owned.

  • saturn57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Who tf is accessing the hub on a chromebook? Never seen an adult use one, so I sure hope it isn’t teenagers on their school laptop . . .

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lots of jurisdictions are blocking the site now, necessitating VPNs to access the site.

    There’s probably a higher percentage of Linux adoption among VPN users.

      • jayambi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        no, not the rounding error: keep in mind, i am a statistic noob: The total amount of plus and minus in the bar chart should cancel eachother out because otherwise all useres wouldnt be 100% which sounds odd.

        But as stated in the other reply i am really a noob and just read the wikipedia on precetnage points.

        • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          so the bottom line, i think the quantity (not percentage) of all the changes nets out to zero, so for simplicity’s sake let’s pretend there’s no chrome, mac, or other. since there are so many more windows users a 1.7% drop in windows is (for the sake of this example) the same as the 22.4% increase in linux users. when you convert away from percentages, you’ll see a quantity that represents the same number, but since you have to divide by the starting number of users and windows had so many more… am i making sense?

          fuck, i’m high. am i even right? it’s been a few decades.

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think it’s relative change and not percentage points, from quick mental math that seems to add up. Very weird choice, maybe trying to inflate the perceived increase in linux users. So it would be a change of a bit more than +1 percentage point for linux.

      • jayambi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Aha i did not know about % points. Why on earth is this the same “%” sign… anyway thanks for clarification

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago
    >>> eval(ln(30/6.3)/ln(1.224))
    7.721232148888825
    >>>
    

    Less than 8 years at this pace to reach 30 %, and 6 more to take over all of desktop and then some. No more Windows in 2040!

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Linux was at -16.1% before?

    Edit: y’all, my point is that the bar graph at the bottom could be better displayed as percentage points in order to show comparable changes.