• ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I still can’t believe that the united states had multiple lunar landing missions and several people set foot on the moon… and now the US military and civilian space agencies are reliant on a company run by a Nazi manchild and that cannot send spaceships and satellites beyond low earth orbit…

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      To be fair to Musk (LOL!) NASA was chock full of former Nazi scientists back then. You don’t believe me? walk into NASA sometime and yell “Heil Hitler!” WOOP! They all jump straight up! R.I.P Jessica Walter.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Shareholders don’t need to make profits anymore because they literally own everything and are actively participating in a coup to keep it that way.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    “Product hoarding” conflicts with wealth hoarding. The only logical solution is to make less durable products that quickly wear out with frequent use.

    That way consumers are forced to spend more and contribute more to the hoarded wealth of individuals who know very well they won’t be able to spend their fortunes before they die. However their desire for more and more wealth to hoard is limitless because it acts as a useless status symbol amongst other wealth hoarders.

    When consumers become concerned about skyrocketing cost of living and wealth inequality, the wealth hoarders will remind them they’re lazy and greedy. If they didn’t want to be poor they should have worked harder (like them) or been more careful not to spend all their money on “frivolous purchases.”

    However if consumers don’t spend enough money on frivolous purchases, they’re not being smart, they’re “product hoarding.” When consumers don’t have money to spend, but the wealth hoarders continue to churn out shitty products that they know nobody will buy, the economy will collapse.

    The wealth hoarders could afford to take the hit. It might even help them understand cause and effect, so they don’t just keep making the same mistakes in the future. They could even use some of their hoarded wealth to get themselves out of the hole they dug by just giving it to the consumers to spend on their own products. But instead, they’re usually just given a bailout because they’re too big to fail.

    After all, the economy would collapse without them…

    • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I feel like the graph looks like that no matter what years you set as the first and last in the range, the scale just gets larger as time goes on, as if printing money to solve problems just does that

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This single diagram really tells you all you ever need to know. And yet a lot of people in the bottom 50% think that the gays or refugees are to blame for their problems.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        LBJ wanted to have social spending and have a massive knockout punch in Vietnam. Instead of a knockout punch, the War turned into a massive quagmire. It was costing the US a fortune, but LBJ didn’t want to raise taxes, so he printed money. Nixon got elected and doubled down on the War and using inflation to pay for it. Then the OPEC oil embargo hit and inflation went through the roof.

        Jimmy Carter’s plan [controlled by Fed chair Paul Volker] solved inflation, but by the time it kicked in Carter had been replaced by Reagan. Reagan deregulated a lot of industries and let them run wild.

        In 1968, ‘middle class’ was defined as one Union job supporting a family of four. At that time $1 million was a vast fortune. By the time Bush Sr. was out, ‘middle class’ meant two incomes to run the home, and $1 million was what a rich guy paid for a party.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 day ago

          Whenever you want to understand the state of the USA, consider George Bush, president, father of George Bush, president.

          We’re a fucking Middle Eastern dynastic fiefdom, with fucking nukes.

          • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The funny thing is that Bush Dr. castigated Reagan’s tax cuts as ‘voo-doo economics’ when they were running against each other in the primaries. Once Reagan won the nomination, Bush signed on whole heartedly

            • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              The intricacies of their complex don/sub dynamic are expertly explored in the hard-hitting documentary Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The only point here, as always, is that everybody and anybody who thinks that this chart and only this chart is what matters, is objectively a fucking idiot who has disqualified their own opinion, along with those implying it is a real, serious opinion, which it is not.

    • groet@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Linux is famously both American and Corporate /s

      But yeah sytsem76 and valve are both american and valve is corporate. And around Lemmy you would think they are the only ones responsible for the Linux boom.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s a little bit of both of those nowadays with all the corporate maintainers and the fact that the Linux Foundation is headquartered in the US and Torvalds lives in the US too

        But really it’s still a global effort

    • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hannah Montana Linux can run code on time itself and create whatever you want from nothing.

      • tomiant@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I sometimes ask people, “Do you think that in 500 years, capitalism will still govern the world? Is capitalism the last system we will ever see, and is it the single best system humanity as a species could possibly come up with?”

        And they are just dumbfounded and don’t know what to say, because they can’t even imagine the concept of an alternative.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Well, capitalism has been around for thousands of years so I don’t see why it would simply just disappear in the next 500.

          • tomiant@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            TRADE. TRADE has been around for thousands of years, and trade doesn’t dictate who we are or what we want to be, the exchange of goods is not the be all end all of our societies. There are ample proof of cultures that did not have money and still lived a good life.

            Capitalism is a very different beast which took shape during the industrial revolution.

            And the fact that you are incapable of seeing an alternative means you are on the side of the oligarch cabal running your life.

          • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Comparing business in ancient times with business today is like comparing warfare of today with sword and shield fighting.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well that’s good news. Now I can finally relax. I’m going to go lay down in my back yard, that is nothing but dry dirt, and stare up at the pollution clouds in the sky. Good time, good times.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oooh look at Mr. Fancy over here with a dry dirt yard and pollution clouds in the sky! We used to dreeeeam about dry dirt yards and pollution clouds, instead we were happy in our pit of acid rain, and we didn’t complain, either!

      • Zier@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Ha! I would give anything for acid rain, I am so parched! Someday I dream of moving to the lush, green fields of Chernobyl.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Are you aware that next to your name are two red warning triangles telling everyone you’re of dubious character?

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          This is a classic illogical proposition. You are denying the antecedent. Just because you can’t see the triangles doesn’t mean that they are there. It is a necessary but not sufficient condition to state that you may have triangles if you do not see the triangles. If you have triangles, you will not see them. But just because you don’t see them won’t mean that you have them. Because nobody sees them. Logic won’t save you!

      • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep. There is a huge echo chamber here who don’t like when things like, cars being objectively more reliable, are pointed out.