• dan69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    That’s my phone choice. Lol can you imagine the amount of tasks needed to complete to accept/deny incoming/outgoing transactions…

    • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Mac osx has unix command prompts built in and the ability to containerize out of the gate. Windows requires WSL and a bunch of other shit to achieve a substantially worse effect.

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        The out of the box containerization is still pretty new though — it’s like a month old

    • Sʏʟᴇɴᴄᴇ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Exactly. Modern Windows is like Tesla - shiny exterior built on top of garbage cobbled together with paperclips and duct tape. No visible knobs, no easy to access features, everything hidden behind layers of needless menus and abstraction with the express goal to extract maximum value from their ‘customers’.

      I’m not an Apple fanboy by any means but I feel like the two ecosystems are much closer now than they were 10-15 years ago.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Inaccurate.

    If you’re a Linux user why wouldn’t you unlock MacOS’ potential by using the command line? MacOS is UNIX based, so you have access to its guts, just as you would any other UNIX based system.

    • VeryVito@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Exactly. MacOS is the best of both worlds; it’s my absolute favorite distro of BSD.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Because I’m not going to willingly give my creative efforts over to a corporation that will hold it hostage and only allow me to work so long as I’m using only their products.

      • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        I mean, yeah, screw using Logic but most major DAWs run on macOS as well as Windows. Up until Linux pulls its finger out its arse on audio it’s pawbably going to stay a macOS dominated industry.

        • zoey@lemmy.librebun.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          My DAC has been fully supported by pipewire for like 2 years now. Bitwig Studio works flawlessly up to my 192kHz.
          Haven’t had to touch audio stuff in Linux since pipewire released. It’s a drop-in replacement for all the other apis.

          • paraphrand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            And audio “works” on Windows too. But both platforms historically have poor audio stacks.

          • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            Audio interfaces still face so many issues on Linux. Part of that might be down to drivers, and that’s on the manufacturers, but often there’s just excessive latency and stuttering.

            • swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              I fixed all of that by following the suggestions on the Arch wiki page for Professional Audio, but I realize that not everyone knows about that.

                • swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  They’re pretty distro-agnostic, you might have to translate some packages to whatever distro you’re using, but that’s just a quick search. The article in question

                  Do note that this requires some amount of fiddling, if that’s not your thing there are some distros that are already configured for audio production, such as AV Linux or Ubuntu Studio.

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Not a problem with Linux. Pipewire works great and offers everything you need from an audio backend, there are great DAWs like Bitwig and Reaper and a good collection of compatible plugins as well. The main problem is hardware, which isn’t the fault of Linux but hardware manufacturers.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 days ago
      /bin/bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/HEAD/install.sh)"
      

      Homebrew, plus some VMs, and you get the best of all platforms in one computer.

      This used to be particularly awesome when macOS was intel based, as now running an intel based machine image on apple’s ARM architecture is awkward by comparison, but hopefully that will resolve somewhat soon.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        That is just dumb. Most devs in tech I know default to Macs as their dev boxes. Macs are also the defacto workhorse for music, video production.

        If you want to say that Macs don’t make for good servers, I’ll give you that, but saying they aren’t tools is just ignorant.

        • mittorn@masturbated.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 days ago

          @the_q linux/bsd/win10 with wsl? Of course, OSX is still useful like remote client and like dev machine for Apple devices, but not for everything else

          • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            8 days ago

            OK first, way to telegraph your crusty age: it hasn’t been OSX for YEARS. macOS 10 was a long running release but we are on macOS 15 now, soon to be 16, though the name convention is switching to years instead of sequential version. If you have a machine still running OSX, yes by all means put ZorinOS or LMDE on it.

            Second, I translated your comment as “I don’t know how to use it so it sux”.

        • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s technically possible to administer Linux servers with a Nintendo DS.

          …Not sure where I was going with that, except to say that you can, in fact, do just that with an actual toy.

  • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is some boomer level “hurr hurr” bullshit that is just patently not true. Keep giving Microsoft credit it doesn’t deserve.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Right? Windows is like a Tesla. One of those wankpanzers that cut off your fingers, brick in the car wash and immolate their drivers.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      The trashing of the Apple machines is undeserved, but the Windows one is relatively accurate.

      Windows is the thing that everybody uses, like a car. But, it should be a modern car where the car manufacturer requires you to pay a yearly subscription to unlock basic features that shipped with the car. It’s a car that you can’t fix yourself, and have to take to an authorized service station where they pay a fee to get access to the tools that allow them to diagnose the car.

      I don’t know what the Mac one should be. A modern Mac is really powerful. It’s a Unix machine with a clean and polished UI. But, it’s true that it shields the average user from the complexity if they don’t want to dig deeper. Maybe it’s a modern Bugatti. A luxurious vehicle that has obscene power under the hood.

    • decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think there is an argument to be made here. About window shitty, inconsistent, obscure ui. That you constantly have to Google to figure out where are your settings. unlike macOs much more streamline UI

  • cyborganism@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’d reverse Windows and Mac. Mac is sleek, smooth, pleasant, well integrated, solid, stable, and has a good shell. They have great machines with great specs and are well built. They also take some learning to become efficient with.

    Windows on the other hand, is cheap, buggy, ugly, unstable, comes pre-packaged with flashy junk, breaks easily, any child can use it and then break it.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I completely agree. As a software developer I preferred when I had a Mac whereas our company uses Windows and Microsoft for everything and it just meh.

      Mac was so easy to do everything from the terminal or the search bar.

      • cyborganism@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        Plus I like how they have the Homebrew packaging system to install pretty much anything you need.

        Windows has something similar with chocolatey but it’s just not as complete. It’s not *nix apps either.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Windows needs to be big brother watching at all times while forcing ads down your throat.

    Apple just needs a very high price tag.

    • skooma_king@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Even that needs a disclaimer. I was ordering some SFF PCs for my org last week and was kind of shocked how much the Lenovo and Dell PCs in that form factor were… out of curiosity I specc’d a Mac Mini with the same RAM and storage and they came in a little cheaper with a better processor. Only caveat is the lack of USB A ports, but dongles are super cheap anyway. If my users wouldn’t need training to use them I would definitely have considered (maybe even preferred from a device management perspective) the Mac Mini.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 days ago

    For the love of Pete, not this again.

    Many flavors of Linux are more simple and user friendly than Windows or Mac.

    Mac is unix-based and very similar to Linux in many ways.

    Windows is like that car that Homer Simpson designed.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m gonna say windows is more like a cybertruck truck. Full of bloat, spyware, and half the features are not like to slice a finger off than do what it’s supposed to- and definitely not bullet proof.

  • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    As an engineer, I would rather develop on Mac than any other OS. I have shit to do and need to work in a POSIX compliant OS without bloat, while also not worrying about my OS install getting borked arbitrarily because I looked at it wrong.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Weird, I’ve been forced to use a Mac for work, never liked it. I prefer Debian or other non-rolling-release distros with long term support, and haven’t had a Linux install get messed up in many years (since I used Arch, and something went wrong with my proprietary Nvidia drivers after an update).

    • freewheel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      As another engineer, I won’t touch another Mac until it allows me to upgrade memory and disk without buying a whole other unit.

      • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Never had to upgrade memory or disk in the lifespan of the machine. What really makes a difference though is 20 hours of battery life. You can run around the office without worrying about staying plugged in.

        Also, AMD is also going towards the SoC approach.its only a matter of time before you can’t upgrade memory on PCs too.

    • banshee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I enjoyed using a MBP for a few years, mostly for the trackpad. I eventually grew too annoyed with the desktop crashes and iCloud bloat though. I built a new Linux workstation last year, and it just feels like home 🐧.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’ll take any excuse that I can get to dump this story somewhere. A relative of mine has bought an iMac. She created some videos with it. After some time has passed, the Mac’s native Apple media player (I forgot the name) refused to play the videos she has created with the Apple iMac software. But it conveniently pointed her to a 20 € “upgrade” that she could buy to make it work again. She asked me for help, I installed MPV instead. Worked like a charm. On an unrelated note, that thing is glued together, and the storage is soldered on, likewise is the ram.

    “Apple’s design is so simple!”. Why do people put up with this trash?

    Edit: I forgot to mention all of the videos were in Apple’s own .mov format.

    • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I decided to switch to mac a couple of years ago. I have been extremely unhappy with the results. I have a good mechanical keyboard which is built for both PC and Mac (it has Mac-specific keys), but nope, compability sucks and keybindings are messed up across a lot of the keys, making it basically a guessing game each time I need a paranthesis. I usually work within a Linux VDI. Within the VDI, keybindings are further messed up, making it hard to find the correct keys, even on the integrated laptop keyboard. I have a usb-c connected screen/docking station which only connects properly about 75% of the time. I have a stream deck which randomly refuses to connect, making me have to unplug and replug every now and then. I regularly want to connect to multiple display, which often turns put to be unsupported and basically impossible.

      To me, it just seems like compability for mac is completely terrible. A lot of the issues could be solved by throwing more money at apple - by getting an apple keyboard or apple screen or subscription software - but for stubborn people like me, apple is not getting a dime for these kind of issues. None of these issues existed before I got the mac.

      I am leaving the apple ecosystem for good when my company allows me to get a new machine.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Yeah, Macs are great if all your other stuff is Apple and all your subscriptions are Apple and all your cloud is Apple and you buy a new $2k unrepairable computer and go along with whatever huge changes Apple brings.

      And they are actually quite user friendly… until something doesn’t work, or you want to reach out of its approved purview.

      They are also dev friendly too, but the hurdle for that is high enough that one might consider Linux at that point.

      But on your point, say what you will about Windows and all the UI garbage and bloat MS adds, but underneath, it is utterly stagnant, lol.

      • jkercher@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        They are also dev friendly too, Not saying you’re wrong because I don’t use it, but from the outside, they appear actively hostile toward developers.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          You have to “unlock” them with a lot of tweaks. And to be clear, I’m just saying they’re better than Windows. Ugh, trying to compile anything on Windows…

          Hardware wise, they’re far better for local code assistants, too, with the exception of a few exotic AMD laptops just now coming out.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If you access the guts of a Mac through CLI tools, I have some questions. Is it legal from the Apple point of view? Will it void your warranty?

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 days ago

          No, using a Mac won’t void the warranty. It’s not a secured platform in the way iOS or a game console is.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 days ago

          There are a couple of safeguards, but by and large you can. And terminal is a pre-installed Apple app, of course it’s Apple “approved.”

          • accideath@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            And a lot of those safe guards (like the System Integrity Protection) can be turned off, if that’s what you like. The terminal together with the homebrew package manager make macOS a really good place to be, if you can’t get rid of some software that won’t run on Linux (like the Adobe suite).

      • nesc@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Anyone can become an official unix system if they would pay up. Random rhel rebuilts were ‘official unix system’ at one point or another.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      MacBooks are legitimately just superior laptops, especially now that apple silicon is well supported. I don’t like iPhones or their desktops, but the laptops are pretty much unmatched in terms of portability, features, battery life etc

      I am an unabashed Linux stan but I use a macbook to ssh into my Linux boxes because there is no Linux laptop which is half as good.