Portainer is changing to a mostly AI and kubernetes supported app.

  • Jul@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    That sucks. It was one of the few GUIs that did a good job with most aspects of Docker Swarm. I knew it was heading in a shitty direction, but I was hoping something else would come along to fill the gap in the mean time.

  • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I switched from Portainer to Komodo a while back. I like how everything is declarative. It almost has a Argo CD feel to it without needed kubernetes.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Maybe it helps if you have a gigantic stack of containers, but I’ve honestly never seen the point of Portainer when I can just look at my compose file.

    • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I set it up years ago when I still had Ubuntu desktop running on an old laptop. Just kept using it even after using and learning kubernetes at work on an enterprise scale. Also the automatic image checks, easy to check metrics, logs, and endpoints. I have 33 containers right now, it’s just simple to see them all in one screen.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Does your compose file in itself give you a nice, easily readable status display, analytics, metrics, logging, etc. interface?

  • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My devs prefer Docker, and don’t want Kubernetes! We have a fix for that: Portainer-D2K. Portainer-D2K is a Docker translator for Kubernetes

    As someone who was using mostly podman and is now switching to kubernetes I can confidently say that the cli interface was not what was holding me back. Instead it was the sheer amount of setup and complexity kubernetes can bring into an environment. Kubernetes is great when you want most or all the features it offers, it is horrible if you want to deploy 3 containers for your application on one host.

    Oh well, not like I have to care, I wasn’t interested in portainer to begin with.

    • northernlights@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Right? Why do they offer a community version and a pro version that’s free for 5 nodes - meaning very small environment, your typical homelab - and push so much for stuff used to manage enterprise-sized deployments?

    • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I use 100% kubernetes at work and help other teams get their app working but at home I don’t run anything that supports it.

  • Scott@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Portainer was outdated 5 years ago, and it sucked at the job it did.

    I’ma stick with dockge and argocd

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I went from Dockge to Dockhand, though both are good. Dockge was my UI of choice for the last couple of years, so slim and simple. I tried Dockhand on a whim and the extra features won me over, without having a bazillion buttons and confusing UI.

      • Scott@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        For a lot of my remote hosted services managed with compose, I’ve just been hand rolling the compose files and ssh’ing in.

  • ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Dropped portainer years ago. Managing some compose files isn’t hard, and Dockhand is better for managing updates

    • Zeoic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Another good option is Arcane. Its project structure gives you a good place to put bind mounts which you can edit the contents of in app (like configs and such). It’s pretty handy. I am in the process of switching to it from komodo for all of my stacks

    • AHorseWithNoNeigh@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Very happy when I migrated over to dockhand. Fits exactly my needs for a simplistic overview of all of my containers and their resources.

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Portainer has worked well for me but it has so much that I don’t need or use. It looks like Dockhand has a Home Assistant integration which is nice, so I’ll check that out thanks for the rec.