• khánh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    wow…! people is using a feature that allows you to modify the appearance of a location anywhere on earth to add craters to places!! truly an unforseeable tragedy.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Don’t even understand what this AI feature was even supposed to be for. I’m certainly not going to rely on an AI to annotate satellite imagery. This was always just a stupid marketing thing with no real purpose behind it.

    For all of Google’s faults, which of course are numerous, they do have some really talented engineers working for them, and it’s just a shame that their time is constantly wasted on crap like this rather than on useful features that people would actually benefit from.

  • opus86@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It might have been that plan all along, but now you can’t tell someone to just google it. You can’t believe google results anymore.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        What on Earth was every the intended use of this feature? I just can’t think of any way to use it other than vandalism and misinformation.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’s intended use was misinformation but perhaps not in the way you imagine.

          Rather than producing credible images, these sorts of projects undermine actual credible images.

          For example, if you’re team zion, then when shown images of how devastating Israel’s attack on Gaza has been you can just disregard them as “probably fake”.

          “Oh pish posh, a child can create these images on google maps”.

        • W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Google wanted its satellite images to help unleash users’ imaginations, like visualizing what an empty lot could look like, or seeing what their neighborhood looked like 100 years ago, or what it could look like 100 years from now.

          • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            I remember doing something similar for a highschool History class – learning about local rivers, riparian corridors, the ancient California valley lake, and our soil types (why and are what they are). All things to draw up a more accurate picture. No way Google would utilize any of that knowledge. If I was a kid today, with that tool… definitely F- homework for sure.

            All imagination, no accuracy.

  • bryndos@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Those are balls.

    This close, they always look like landscape. But nope, you’re looking at balls.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Eh, this one’s fixable, because you only have a few sources of legit imagery, and it’s all contemporary and digital. Just have Google Earth render the image server-side and add a cryptographic signature to any legit satellite images that someone saves.

    You can have AI-generated satellite imagery and image-is-proof satellite images coexisting. Can’t do that for most images, but for this particular niche, you can.